Court : Delhi
..... order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from shop no.1 of property bearing 1372, shastri nagar, delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. rc.rev .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from shop no.2 of property bearing 1372, shastri nagar, delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. rc.rev .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of the victim nor the school authorities reported the matter to the police and technically are liable for prosecution u/s 21 of pocso act. this delay has not been explained by the prosecution. though the mother of the victim claimed that she was under threat from her in ..... 2019 crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p.418/2019 page 1 of 11 1. the present application under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, filed on behalf of the petitioner, seeks condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the leave petition.2. issue notice.3. mr. ..... and pushpa madaan, the respondents of charges framed against them, for commission of offences punishable under section 6 pocso act read with section 5 (m) and (p) of the said act against the former, and for offences under section 21 pocso crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p. ..... 418/2019 page 2 of 11 act read with section 506 indian penal code against the latter. in a nutshell, the facts of the case as elaborated by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of the victim nor the school authorities reported the matter to the police and technically are liable for prosecution u/s 21 of pocso act. this delay has not been explained by the prosecution. though the mother of the victim claimed that she was under threat from her in ..... 2019 crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p.418/2019 page 1 of 11 1. the present application under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, filed on behalf of the petitioner, seeks condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the leave petition.2. issue notice.3. mr. ..... and pushpa madaan, the respondents of charges framed against them, for commission of offences punishable under section 6 pocso act read with section 5 (m) and (p) of the said act against the former, and for offences under section 21 pocso crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p. ..... 418/2019 page 2 of 11 act read with section 506 indian penal code against the latter. in a nutshell, the facts of the case as elaborated by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the self-acquired property by late mr. sanjeevan chaturvedi himself and accordingly the properties in delhi have devolved on the petitioner in terms of section 8 of the hindu succession act. he has not taken the properties in delhi as karta of huf of which respondent no.1 would be a member but has taken them in his individual capacity. rc .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... . (emphasis supplied) 16. from the aforesaid, it is apparent that even the necessary ingredients to attract the presumptions under sections 113a and 113b of the indian evidence act, are not fulfilled.17. consequently, the present matter is a case of no evidence. accordingly, present leave petition being bereft of merits is dismissed. manmohan, j ..... the commission of some offence. ingredient of that the section is (emphasis supplied) 10. consequently, in the present case, even section 27 of the indian evidence act is not attracted.11. thirdly, the prosecution s case of cruelty, harassment and dowry demand was based on the statements of family members of the deceased pinki, ..... statement made by respondent- accused no.1vinod kumar to the police is inadmissible in evidence as the same is barred by section 25 of the indian evidence act. moreover, no fact was discovered in pursuance to any confessional statement allegedly made by respondent-accused no.1 vinod kumar to the police inasmuch as the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... applied, on 31st may, 2017, to the central council of indian medicine, being the competent authority in this regard, for recognition, under section 13(a) of indian medicine central council act, 1970, for 60 seats in the under graduate course in bachelors of medicine and surgery (ug-bams).2. the application was initially rejected, by respondent no.2 on the ground .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... petitioner. 13. notice has been issued in the said petition on 2nd june, 2018. the... petitioner, thereafter, filed a petition under section 192 of the indian succession act, 1925, seeking the following reliefs: in the circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this hon ble court may be pleased to: a. pass an order thereby allowing ..... , except in accordance with law. he further submits that the genuineness of a will cannot be gone into in a petition under section 192 of the indian succession act, 1925, which is settled in the judgment of uma devi nambiar (supra) itself. thus, given the fact that the probate petition was pending and the... respondents ..... . singh (oral) 1. the present petition challenges the impugned order dated 13th august, 2018, by which the... petitioner s application under section 195 of the indian succession act, 1925, for appointment of a curator, was rejected by the ld. trial court.2. the background of the present proceedings is that one ms. piroja edalji and mr .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... pertaining to compound interest and hence, no review would lie of the judgment is, in our view unsustainable, in the facts obtaining in the present case. an act of abandonment would generally include relinquishment or giving up of right or interest in property with an intent of never again seeking resumption of such right or interest. ..... supreme court in paragraph 18 of the judgement in s.l. arora s case wherein it construes the scope and ambit of provisions of section 31(7) of the act, being apposite are extracted hereinbelow: ....18. section 31(7) makes no reference to payment of compound interest or payment of interest upon interest. nor does it ..... nathir yeshwantrao bhusari vs. sarabhai, 1994 mllj1829 though stricto senso, the provisions of order 47 rule 1 of the cpc may not apply to matters falling under the act, the principles analogous thereto can certainly be relied upon by the court.8. the facts on record show that arbitrators have in their award directed compounding of interest. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... also mr navin kumar, who appeared on advance notice on behalf of the respondent. the moot point is : whether the tribunal in reaching the conclusion, which it did, had acted with patent illegality or in derogation of the public policy of india. the arbitral tribunal has directed reimbursement of enhanced entry tax based on clause 70.7 of the copa ..... w.e.f. 17.06.2014, till the date of actual payment.3. aggrieved by the same the present petition under section 34 of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 (in short the act), was instituted on 11.09.2014.4. ms tanu priya dutta, who appeared for the petitioner, assailed the award on the ground that the award had resulted in ..... of 1%. admittedly, the state of madhya pradesh enhanced the entry tax from 1% to 27% by bringing about an amendment to the madhya pradesh entry tax act, 1976 (in short 1976 act). 2.5 in this behalf, the state government of madhya pradesh issued a notification dated 01.04.2007, in exercise of its powers, under section 4- a .....
Tag this Judgment!