Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... landlord who entered into development agreemnt with the builder for development of his land and construction of building therein, is a consumer within the meaning of provisions of consumer protection act. the supreme court held : the basic underlying purpose of the agreement is the construction of a house or an apartment (ground floor) in accordance with the specifications, by the builder .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... team which conducted the operation and authorities of the state government who failed to ensure obedience to the norms and guidelines of the government and organizers of the eye camp acting pursuant to and under the authority of the government . 56. in kusum sharmas case, the principles governing the cases of medical negligence are summarized as under: i. ..... coagulopathy (d.i.c). no medical expert's opinion or any medical literature has been shown by the appellant-complainant to prove that this haemorrhage was caused by any act of medical negligence on the part of the respondents, especially dr. jaya. law on the subject is well settled by the hon'ble supreme court in the case ..... still does not survive or suffers a permanent ailment, it would be difficult to hold the doctor to be guilty of negligence. but in cases where the doctors act carelessly and in a manner which is not expected of a medical practitioner, then in such a case an action in torts would be maintainable." 52. the national .....
Tag this Judgment!