Court : Supreme Court of India
..... or the accused being able to manipulate circumstances to his or her advantage.25. in this light, the interplay between section 6a of the act and a constitutional court monitored investigation should be such as to protect senior government officials from frivolous and vexatious complaints and at the same time prevent ..... the level of joint secretary and above; and 2. such officers as are appointed by the central government in corporations established by or under any central act, government companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by that government. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no such approval shall ..... the level of joint secretary and above; and (b) such officers as are appointed by the central government in corporations established by or under any central act, government companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by that government. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no such approval shall .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... the collector ultimately granted the permission as directed by the government. thus, as can be seen, that instead of the statutory authority viz. the collector acting in accordance with the statutory mandate, only because a direction was given by the minister that the statutory authority was bypassed, and even the enquiry as ..... chapter viii restrictions on transfers of agricultural lands and acquisition of holdings and lands89transfers to non-agriculturists barred.- transfers to (1) save as provided in this act, non-agricul- turists barred a) no sale (including sales in execution of a decree of a civil court or for recovery of arrears of land ..... for the reliefs as prayed. the petition enclosed the above referred news reports, as also the information obtained through enquiry under the right to information act, 2005 by one shri shashikant mohanlal thakker of madhapur village of taluka bhuj. this information contained the documents incorporating the file notings of the revenue department .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... | | | | | |sitio| | | | | | | | | |n | | sd/-l.a.c. 15.09.2008 11. hence, the declaration made by the government for acquisition of land of the appellant under section 6 of the act does not provide any reason for arriving at a decision contrary to that of the report produced by the land acquisition collector. therefore, the basic protection to which the landowners ..... in an unauthorized manner without getting any permission either under the provisions of the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas restriction of unregulated development act, 1963 or under the relevant municipal laws. even then in some cases, relief was granted by releasing some portion of the land under ..... the development and utilization of the land as residential and commercial purposes. the notification was issued under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (in short the act ) and the land acquisition collector, urban estate, faridabad, haryana was authorized to issue public notice on the substance of notification .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... , after scrutinizing the relevant records, found the allegations prima facie proved, justifying detailed investigation by the special police establishment under the prevention of corruption act, and the performance of duty by the petitioners in no way affects any of the privileges even remotely enjoyed by the assembly or its members. ..... has been stated, thus: the detention of a member under regulation 18b of the defence (general), regulation 1939, made under the emergency powers (defence) acts 1939 and 1940, led to the committee of privileges being directed to consider whether such detention constituted a breach of privilege of the house; the committee reported ..... under a licence. the respondent, collector of customs, calcutta, started proceedings for confiscation of these goods under section 167(8) of the sea customs act, 1878. the appellants mainly contended that the proceedings are entirely without jurisdiction as the collector can confiscate only when there is an import in contravention of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... (supra), has invoked the principle of irretrievably breaking down of marriage. for the present, we shall restrict our delineation to the issue whether the aforesaid acts would constitute mental cruelty. we have already referred to few authorities to indicate what the concept of mental cruelty means. mental cruelty and its effect cannot ..... of desertion, this court in savitri pandey v. prem chandra pandey[5]. has ruled thus:- desertion , for the purpose of seeking divorce under the act, means the intentional permanent forsaking and abandonment of one spouse by the other without that other s consent and without reasonable cause. in other words it is ..... respondent-husband, an associate professor in ambedkar medical college, kadugondanahalli, bangalore, filed a petition, m.s. no.5 of 2001 under section 13(1) the act seeking for a decree for judicial separation and dissolution of marriage. however, in course of the proceeding the petition was amended abandoning the prayer for judicial separation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... period of 90 days shall be deemed to have exercised option in favour of the existing cpf/fpf schemes covered under the provisions of employees provident fund act, 1952. the option once exercised or deemed to have been exercised shall be considered as final and no representation in this respect shall be considered valid for ..... that wide publicity was not given to subsequent notices, the respondents relied upon the response dated 26th november, 2007 to a query raised under the right to information act, 2005 which states that the notice dated 4th february, 1997 was not received in the office of the executive engineer (prot.) ratangarh nor was it dispatched ..... march, 1999 closing the receipt of switch-over options.23. at this stage, it may be mentioned that the rajasthan legislature enacted the rajasthan power sector reforms act, 1999 which resulted in the rajasthan power sector reforms transfer scheme 2000, which in turn resulted in the unbundling of the rseb into five companies. the five .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... the state is empowered to distribute natural resources. however, as they constitute public property/national asset, while distributing natural resources the state is bound to act in consonance with the principles of equality and public trust and ensure that no action is taken which may be detrimental to public interest. like any other ..... , that too by entertaining private applications, are arbitrary, illegal and fraudulent and against the public policy as contemplated under section 23 of the indian contract act.29. in the course of argument, mr. vikas singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents in all the three appeals filed a compilation of ..... the proposal of the respondent before the board of directors. cidco further requested the respondent to submit registration certificate either under the trust act or the society registration act before allotment/ possession of the land so that the case of the respondent could be considered for allotment at subsidized rate in terms .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... counsel for the revenue contends that even if no manufacturing process involved, the case still falls within section 5(1)(a) of the kerala general sales tax act, because the statutory provision speaks not only of goods consumed in the manufacture of other goods for sale but also goods consumed otherwise. there is a fallacy in ..... 5 of the said judgment and therefore we would like to reproduce the same as under:4. section 5-a(1)(a) of the kerala general sales tax act envisages the consumption of a commodity in the manufacture of another commodity. the goods purchased should be consumed, the consumption should be in the process of manufacture, ..... him. in the said show cause notice the additional commissioner had proposed to classify the product of the appellant/assessee under heading 2108 of the central excise tariff act, 1985, as miscellaneous edible preparation not elsewhere specified or included. it may be stated that assessee is engaged in the packing combination of mixture of raw rice, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... march, 1985, the central government hereby exempts the excisable goods of the description specified in the annexure below and falling under the schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985 (5 of 1986), (hereinafter referred to as the specified goods ), and cleared for home consumption on or after the 1st day of april in any ..... his order- in-original dated january 17, 2005. penalty under rule 25 of the central excise rules as well as interest under section 11ab of the central excise act was also imposed. the appeal of the assessee to the commissioner (a) proved futile as it was dismissed by the commissioner (a) vide orders dated july 19, ..... notifications?. the assessee in civil appeal no.2789 of 2007 is the manufacturer of medicaments which fall under chapter heading 30 of the first schedule of the central excise tariff act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ceta, 1985 ). in addition, it is manufacturing medicines under the brand name belonging to third parties, viz., m/s. roots .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... | |correspondences/orders | | | |are therefore exempt | | | |from disclosure in terms| | | |of the provisions of | | | |section 8(1)(a) (d) and | | | |(e) of the rti act, | | | |2005. | |2. |complete list of banks which were | | | |issued show cause notices before | | | |fine was imposed as also referred | | | |in enclosed news clipping | | ..... | | |violations/contraventions made by scb |inspection (afi) of | | | |the bank which is | | | |conducted under the | | | |provisions of sec.35 | | | |of the br act, 1949. | | | |the findings of the | | | |inspection are | | | |confidential in | | | |nature intended | | | |specifically for the | | | |supervised entities | | ..... | | | |state. | | | |as such the | | | |information cannot be| | | |disclosed in terms of| | | |section 8(1) (a) and | | | |(e) of the rti act, | | | |2005 | |4. |please provide us the details/copies |-do- | | |of the findings recordings, enquiry | | | |reports, directive orders file notings| | | |and/or any information on .....
Tag this Judgment!