Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 42 unlawful detention of pay Page 69 of about 882 results (0.221 seconds)

Apr 30 2013 (HC)

Vikram Goyal Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... not private in nature and have serious impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc.cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. but the criminal cases having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2012 (HC)

Frankfinn Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Franklyn Institute of La ...

Court : Kolkata

..... . the aeroplanes shown in the respondent s advertisement is suggestive of the services imparted and therefore the petitioner is entitled to restrain orders for passing off action. dishonesty in the acts of the respondent is evident. section 29(4) is applicable as the application for registration in the wordmark is pending. the petitioner is registered in the label frankfinn . therefore, has ..... an exclusive right to use the word as it is a part of the label. reliance is also placed on sections 17 and 29(9) of the 1999 act. from a reading of the memorandum and articles of association of franklyn advisory services pvt.ltd., it will not be evident that the business was transferred or the object is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2012 (HC)

Vir Vikram Seth and anr. Vs. Joginder Parkash Ahuja and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... (tenants).mr.aman bahri, advocate for respondents(landlords).*** jaswant singh, j. petitioners(tenants) are in revision under section 15(5) of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the act) against the order dated 01.02.2012 passed by the learned appellate authority, chandigarh whereby learned appellate authority has assessed the mesne profits at the rate of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2013 (HC)

Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga Advocate Vs. M/S Mount Shivalik Breweries ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... supplied any material to the firms.who have supplied corrugated boxes and other packaging material to the assessee. therefore, in terms of explanation to section 194c of the act, the assessee is not liable for deduction of tax at source. the commissioner income tax (appeals) returned a finding that the assessee has not supplied any material ..... a contract for sale and not a works contract, which may make the assessee liable for deduction of tax at source in terms of section 194c of the act. the assessing officer made the asseesee liable for payment of deduction of tax holding that transactions are in the execution of the works contract. in appeal, the ..... reported in the digest?. present: ms.urvashi dhugga, advocate for the appellant. hemant gupta, j. (oral) the present appeal under section 260a of the income tax act, 1961 (for short 'the act') arises out of an order passed by the income tax appellate tribunal, chandigarh, bench 'a' chandigarh (for short 'the tribunal') on 24.09.2012 holding .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2013 (HC)

Sunita Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... but only lal singh @ algu could be arrested and the others escaped. fir no.34 dated 06.04.2013 under sections 399, 402 ipc and section 25 of the arms act was registered in police station sector-20, panchkula. house of the petitioner s husband was raided on the same day at about 6pm but he could not be arrested. on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2013 (HC)

“after Release of Shops Along Sirsa-barnala Road Vs. State of Haryan ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the digest?. surya kant, j. [oral].the petitioner impugns the notifications dated 15.01.2008 and 14.01.2009 issued under sections 4 and 6 respectively of the land acquisition act, 1894 as also the award dated 12.01.2011 to the extent it pertains to his land/plot measuring about 10'x41' over which he has raised construction of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Sunish Bindlish Advocate Vs. M/S Honda Motorcycle and Sco ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the central excise tariff act, 1985 and has availed cenvat credit facilities in respect of tool kits and firs.aid kits sold along with two wheelers.during audit, it was found that the ..... credit amounting to rs.50,65,946/- under rule 14 of the cenvat credit rules, 2004 read with firs.proviso to section 11a(1) of the central excise act, 1944. the adjudicating authority also ordered recovery of interest and imposed penalty. the assessee- respondent is engaged in manufacture of two wheelers falling under chapter 87 of ..... ble ms.justice ritu bahri present: mr.sunish bindlish, advocate, for the appellant. hemant gupta, j.(oral) the present appeal under section 35g of the central excise act, 1944 arises out of an order passed by the customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal (for short the tribunal .) on 24.4.2012. the revenue has claimed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2013 (HC)

Present:- Mr. Balwinder Singh Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... plot.6. in our considered view, the recourse adopted by the revisional authority is wholly illegal and derogatory to its powers under section 45(8) of the act of 1995. the revisional authority ought to have kept in view that the allotment was in the year 2008 and revision petition was instituted after a period of ..... of punjab, department of housing and urban development, punjab in exercise of powers under section 45(8) of the punjab regional and town planning and development act, 1995 (for brevity the 'act of 1995'), whereby revision petition preferred by respondent no.2 against forfeiture of 10% of the total amount deposited towards allotment price of plot no.2025, ..... , which was dismissed by the appellate authority on 05.08.2010.4. still aggrieved, respondent no.2 preferred a revision petition under section 45(8) of the act of 1995, with the following prayer:- keeping in view the facts, law and the circumstances of the case, it is therefore, respectfully prayed that the present revision .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2013 (HC)

Gurkirpal Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... not private in nature and have serious impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc.cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. but the criminal cases having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2013 (HC)

Balbir Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... has submitted that temporary release can be allowed on any other sufficient cause under section 3(1)(d) of the punjab act. when the temporary release on the ground of marriage is provided as a separate class and if the marriage of the person claimed is not there in that clause, ..... release is not permissible to attend the marriage of a sister and it allows temporary release only in case of marriage of son or daughter. the provisions of the haryana act have been quoted only because in the same sister's marriage is also one of the grounds, on which temporary release could be sought. learned counsel for the petitioner ..... for a period of fifteen days for the purpose of marriage of his sister, under the provisions of section 3(1)(d) of the haryana good conduct prisoners(temporary release) act, 1988. crl. writ petition no.493 of 2013 --2-- learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the marriage of the sister of the petitioner is due on .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //