Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 42 unlawful detention of pay Page 34 of about 882 results (0.206 seconds)

B.R. Malhotra Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)1049; 71(1998)DLT498; 1998(44)DRJ337

..... respondent and of the hospital authorities, the petitioner suffered financial loss to the tune of rs.36,924.00 . petitioner rightly contended that filling of form was only a ministerial act on which he had no control. merely, because the medical proceedings were sent on a wrong form filled by the hospital authorities, the petitioner cannot be made to suffer monetary .....

Vinodbhai @ Mafatbhai Rabari Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1049

..... the case before the hon'ble court, learned counsel appearing for the state of gujarat had straightaway conceded before the hon'ble supreme court that there was no such overt act as ascribed to the accused. considering this and the fact that the accused was in jail for a considerable long time and that there was hardly any chance of his .....

Badrising Mishrising and anr. Vs. Pramod Kumar Bhagwatilal Banatwala

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1980Guj142

..... from the material on record of , this case. mr. pandya relies on, three of the rules of the road which are contained in the 10th schedule to the motor vehicles act, 1939. rule 1 enjoins upon the driver of a motor vehicle to drive the vehicle as close to the left hand side of the road as may be expedient and ..... apply only in a case in which there is a main road designated as such , under section 77 of the motor vehicles act. there is no evidence on record to suggest that the road between maninagar railway station and bal vatika was designated as a main road, as such, rule 7, therefore, cannot be pressed into service by mr. pandya to advance .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Jivram Jetha Bambhania (Dead) Through ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : III(2006)ACC450; [2006(109)FLR900]

..... -insurance company has challenged the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned commissioner in this appeal which is filed under section 30 of the workmen's compensation act.2. initially, in this appeal, substantial questions of law were not framed. therefore, civil application no. 6778 of 2005 was filed in this appeal and following ..... the claimants by holding that the deceased died in an accident while on duty. relying on two decisions of the hon'ble supreme court (1) saumshtra salt manufacturing co. v. bal valu raja and ors. reported in : (1958)iillj249sc and (2) regional director, e.s.l corporation and anr. v. francis de costa and anr. reported in : ..... we may state that since the workman died in motor vehicle accident, his heirs and dependents could have filed claim petition claiming compensation under the motor vehicles act and looking to the age and income of the deceased-workman, they might have been awarded more compensation than the amount awarded by the commissioner as the .....

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2005(4)Raj2863; 2006(1)WLC40

..... been expressed by the hon'ble karnataka high court in case of oriental insurance company limited v. minaxi (air 2000 karnataka 73). noticing the change in the new motor vehicles act, a similar view has also been held by the hon'ble kerala high court in case of united india insurance co. ltd. v. appukuttan .10. in the present case, ..... of new india assurance co. ltd. v. babasaheb anna mali and ors. (2002(1) tac 47 (bom.) however with introduction of section 147(1)(b)(i) of the motor vehicles act, 1988, the high courts are firmly of the view that under the said section the insurance company would be liable to indemnify the owner of the vehicle which was insured ..... liability of the insurance company is a limited one. however, such is not the case in this appeal. on the date of the accident, the new act was already in force. under the said act, the liability of the insurance company is unlimited. hence the contention of the learned counsel is without merit.13. on the factual matrix, the case of .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2007ACJ60

..... high court in case of new india assurance co. ltd. v. babasaheb anna mali : air2002bom27 . however, with introduction of section 147(1)(b)(i) of the motor vehicles act, 1988, the high courts are firmly of the view that under the said section the insurance company would be liable to indemnify the owner of the vehicle which was insured ..... also been expressed by the hon'ble karnataka high court in case of oriental insurance co. ltd. v. minaxi 2000 acj 385 (karnataka). noticing the change in new motor vehicles act, a similar view has also been held by the hon'ble kerala high court in case of united india insurance co. ltd. v. appukuttan .10. in the present case ..... liability of the insurance company is a limited one. however, such is not the case in this appeal. on the date of the accident, the new act was already in force. under the said act, the liability of the insurance company is unlimited. hence, the contention of the learned counsel is without merit.13. on the factual matrix, the case .....

Abbas Ali Shikdar Vs. Karim Bakhsh Shikdar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 4Ind.Cas.466

..... fide intention on the part of the donor to divest himself in presenti of the property, and to confer it on the donee. the question whether the transfer of property act was applicable was apparently not considered in mahomed esuph ravutan v. pattamsa ammal 23 m. 70 nor is it stated whether the deed of gift in that case was registered ..... transactions do not require delivery of possession, but, if it be granted that they were sales, they must come within the provisions of section 54 of the transfer of property act. that they are sales seems to us to follow from the definition given in that section and besides the section the following authorities may be cited, namely, macnaghten's mahomedan ..... is invalid by reason of the fact that possession was not delivered. if it is a sale or exchange, it is invalid under the provisions of the transfer of property act.4. it appears to us that the so-called gift was a sale. according to the plaint it was made in consideration of a dower debt of rs. 49, and .....

C. Ramya Bala Vs. Ch. Jayaram and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... different court, the necessity to pronounce upon ex.a2 would arise once again and the adjudication and the findings recorded in an o.p. filed under section 372 of the act cannot be treated as final, much less binding on such proceedings. hence, we allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the trial court. it is however ..... to the adjudication of the claims in respect of movable properties on the one hand and immovable properties on the other. sections 370 and 372 of part-x of the act provide for grant of succession certificate in respect of movable properties, which are enlisted in sub-section (2) of section 370. the mechanism provided for under part-x ..... question that arises before us is as to whether it was competent for the court to pronounce upon the legality or proof of will, dated 21-11-2005 the act provides for adjudication of the disputes of various kinds pertaining to the claims based upon testate and intestate succession. the facility of execution of a will is created not .....

G. K. Sood vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... appointed the petitioner as whole-time director on the board of nddb in violation of the provisions of section 8(3) and section 19 of the national dairy development board act.6. mr. sandeep sethi, ld. asg has placed the statutory provisions before us which read as follows:-" 8(3) the chairman and the director referred to in clause ..... board has not been included in the list of public sector enterprises. ld. asg points out that the nddb has been constituted under the provisions of national dairy development act, 1987 and is a statutory body. it is submitted that the office memorandum therefore, clearly has no application to the board of nddb and the challenge premised thereon ..... sr. adv. with mr. ajit warrier, mr. aditya nayyar and mr. varun, advs. for r-2&3. coram: hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble mr. justice c.hari shankar judgment (oral) gita mittal, acting chief justice w.p.(c) 5433/2018 1. this writ petition challenges the appointment of respondent no.3 as a whole-time director on .....

Navin Soi vs.state & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... . date of decision:14. h february, 2019 coram: hon'ble mr. justice manmohan judgment manmohan, j: (oral) 1. present petition has been filed under section 276 of the indian succession act, 1925, for grant of probate of will dated 11th march, 2010, executed by late mrs. pushpa kumari soi.2. in the petition it has been averred that the petitioner is .....