Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 40 offences relating to force court Court: chennai Page 18 of about 437 results (1.091 seconds)

S. Palanisamy Vs. The Sub-Registrar, Nallur, Tiruppur District and Ano ...

Court : Chennai

..... mrs.saraswathi, who are petitioner's mother and sisters respectively, and himself as legal heirs. they succeeded the estate left behind by late subramania gounder as per the hindu succession act. after his father's death, his mother and two sisters decided to release and relinquish all their 3/4th right, title and interest over the property in his favour, for .....

G. Lakshmi and Another Vs. U. Saraswathi

Court : Chennai

..... if due attestation is also not proved, the fact of execution is of no avail. section 63 of the indian succession act, 1925 also lays down certain rules with regard to the execution of unprivileged wills. clause (c) of section 63 provides that the will shall be attested by two ..... alive, and subject to the process of the court and capable of giving evidence. a reading of section 68 will show that 'attestation' and 'execution' are two different acts one following the other. there can be no valid execution of a document which under the law is required to be attested without the proof of its due attestation and ..... . this brings us to the question of the will alleged to have been executed by deceased lachiram in favour of his grandson purshottam, defendant 3. section 68 of evidence act relates to the proof of execution of document required by law to be attested. admittedly, a deed of will is one of such documents which necessarily require by law to .....

Advocates' Forum for Social Justice rep. by its President, Mr. K. Balu ...

Court : Chennai

..... of a writ of declaration, declaring the tamil nadu establishment of private law colleges (prohibition) act, 2014 (act 13 of 2014) as illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the constitution of india. prayer: petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for ..... under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of a writ of declaration, declaring the tamil nadu establishment of private law colleges (prohibition) act, 2014 (act 13 of 2014) as illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the constitution of india. prayer: petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance ..... under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of a writ of declaration, declaring the tamil nadu establishment of private law colleges (prohibition) act, 2014 (act 13 of 2014) as illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the constitution of india. prayer: petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for .....

P. Sudhakar and Others Vs. T.K. Govinda Raj and Others

Court : Chennai

..... with the obligation to test the bona fide of the reason placed by the litigant, which should not unnecessarily cause relative hardship. the provisions of the limitation act are not meant to destroy the rights of the parties, but they are meant to see that the parties do not resort to dilatory tactics. 16. the ..... there is no presumption that delay in approaching the court is always deliberate. this court has held that the words 'sufficient cause' under section 5 of the limitation act should receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice vide shakuntala devi jain vs. kuntal kumari (air 1969 sc 575) and state of west bengal v ..... as laid down in the decisions referred to above that in considering the application filed under section 5 of the limitation act, the court should exercise the discretionary power conferred under section 5 of the limitation act liberally. but even while liberally exercising the discretion, the court is burdened with the obligation to test the bona- .....

Nashath Jinan and Others Vs. The Government of India, Rep. by its Secr ...

Court : Chennai

..... the institute. 21. in the case on hand, this court has already held that reservation for local residents in provided under section 13(m) of the jipmer act. the jipmer institution is located at puducherry and therefore, academic advisory committee, in its meeting held on 02.03.2016, took a decision to adopt the said ..... faulted with. the learned additional solicitor general would also submit that regulation 28 of jipmer regulations, 2008 is to be read down for the reason that jipmer act itself provides for reservation and therefore, the decision of the standing academic committee merely confirms and enforces the said reservation by adopting g.o.ms.no.04 dated ..... and should have also passed the higher secondary examination from the same school. 9. the learned additional solicitor general would further submit that section 13 of the jipmer act, 2008 deals with functions of jipmer and as per sub-section (m), jipmer may reserve at least twenty seats out of every seventy five seats in undergraduate .....

M. Rajendran Vs. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... the lease were granted in favour of respondents 7 to 22 by the impugned resolution without following any of the procedures contemplated, under the district municipalities act, and the confirmation of lease by the impugned resolution, is against the interest of thirumangalam municipality and public. the following are the factual details that ..... passed by kumbakonam municipality, on the ground that the petitioner has a remedy of statutory appeal to the government under section 36 of tamil nadu district municipalities act. he also relied upon yet another division bench judgment of this court in kanagam v. commissioner, coimbatore and others reported in (2008 (3) mlj 185 ..... has a remedy of statutory appeal to the government, as against the resolution of the municipality, under section 36 of the tamil nadu district municipalities act and that the petitioner cannot directly rush to this court. the prayer in the writ petition indicates that the resolution challenged before this court relates to .....

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Kumbakonam, rep. by its Branch Manage ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... (v) in reshma kumari and others v. madan mohan reported in (2009) 13 scc 422, the hon'ble apex court reiterated that the compensation awarded under the act should be just and also identified the factors which should be kept in mind while determining the amount of compensation. the relevant portions of the judgment are extracted below: the ..... observations which can appropriately be applied for deciding the petitions filed under section 166 of the act: we must emphasise that the court has to strike a balance between the inflated and unreasonable demands of a victim and the equally untenable claim of the ..... (sc), the hon'ble supreme court, comprising of three hon'ble judges bench was dealing with a case arising out of a complaint filed under the consumer protection act, 1986. while enhancing the compensation awarded by the national consumer disputes redressal commission from rs.15 lakhs to rs.1 crore, the hon'ble bench made the following .....

M/s. Divya Impex, Bengaluru rep by its Authorized Signatory and Others ...

Court : Chennai

..... suit the standards and performance of the materials to be produced. while issuing the tender notification, the procedure contemplated under the tamil nadu tender transparency act, 1998 and the rules made thereunder were followed by the respondents and no hideouts were played. therefore, the contentions of the learned senior counsels ..... to penalty and the managing director, directors of the company, company secretary and the auditors of the company are subject to punishment under the companies act, 2013. however, no such regulations are there for partnership or proprietary firm. therefore, in order to have stability in implementing the contract for the ..... arbitrarily. (v) further according to the petitioners, the impugned notification specifies that the bidder should be a company registered in india under the companies act, 1956/2013 whereas no such notification had been prescribed in the year 2011. therefore, the impugned notification deprives the rights of the registered partnership firm .....

The Executive officer Vs. 1.Srinivasan .. .

Court : Chennai

..... government or public sector. wage claims to be made against such authorities will also fall under article 7, limitation act, 1963. such was also the view of this court in cdj2007mhc1262where a teacher made a claim to government for arrears of salary after three years of it's accrual ..... the temple fund from temple fund. any amount due to him from temple authorities is like a claim due to any person from the government. article 7 of limitation act, 1963 has universal application to all type of wage claim. there is no distinction as to the claim based on the type of institution or entity, whether private, ..... of the salary. upto his superannuation, he can claim it and till such time, it is a continuous and subsisting right. in such circumstances, article 7 of the limitation act, 1963 is inapplicable to the plaintiff, thus, the decision cited is also not applicable to his case.14. we have given our deep consideration to the rival submissions, .....

K. Venugopal (Died) and 4 ors. Vs. the Commissioner and Secy. to Govt. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC649; (2003)2MLJ121

ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. The second appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law:(a) Whether the lower appellate Court is correct in applying the observation made by the Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 4725/95 which is relating to the grant of interim order for the continuance of service of an employee in a matter wherein an individual has approached for the alteration of date of birth on the verge of his retirement?(b) Whether the lower appellate Court is correct in holding that the appellant cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the civil Court and he is bound to convince the third respondent only in deciding his community status in spite of the fact that the revenue authorities have failed to consider various documentary evidence adduced on an earlier occasion?(c) Whether the lower appellate Court is correct in summarily rejecting all the documentary evidence by observing that they are related to different persons, even though, number of documents ac...