Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 4 constitution of the force Court: supreme court of india Page 15 of about 547 results (0.105 seconds)

Dec 15 2016 (SC)

Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. Vs. S. L. Seal and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... value of mineral resources; and that it will alleviate the procedural delay, which in turn would check slowdown which adversely affected the growth of mining sector. the amendment act, 2015, as is evident from the objects, aims at: (i) eliminating discretion; (ii) improving transparency in the allocation of mineral resources; (iii) simplifying ..... on coal and steel, who gave their report in may, 2013. as is evident from the statement that difficulties were experienced because the existing act does not permit the auctioning of mineral concessions. it was observed that with auctioning of mineral concessions, transparency in allocation will improve; government will ..... of existing concession-holders and applicants. (1) all applications received prior to the date of commencement of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 2015, shall become ineligible. (2) without prejudice to sub-secion (1), the following shall remain eligible on and from the date of commencement of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2003 (SC)

Ved Prakash and ors. Vs. Ministry of Industry, Lucknow and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3479; 2003(2)AWC1462(SC); JT2003(3)SC284; 2003(3)SCALE342; (2003)9SCC542; [2003]2SCR1000

..... evident from this section, no person could erect or occupy any building in the industrial development area in contravention of any building regulation made under the act. regulation 4 of building regulations shows that no person shall erect any building without obtaining a prior building permit thereof from the chief executive officer in the ..... a person (including a firm or other body of individuals, whether incorporated or not) to whom any land or building is transferred in any manner whatsoever, under this act and includes his successors and assigns;' '6. functions of the authority - (1) the object of the authority shall be to secure the planned development of the ..... challenging the acquisition proceedings is that because their lands are having abadi, they are covered by the existing state policy for not acquiring such lands under the act. whether these lands are paying abadi or not, is a vexed questions of fact which we have kept open for consideration of appropriate authorities instead of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2004 (SC)

The Chief of Marketing (Marketing Division), Coal India Ltd. and anr. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (SCSuppl)2004(4)CHN124; JT2004(5)SC522; 2004(4)SCALE71; (2004)4SCC146

..... 10a(1) the coal controller with the government of india may, by order in writing, direct, that any coal despatched by any colliery owner, or a person acting on behalf of a colliery owner, to any person, which is in transit, shall subject to such terms and conditions, if any, as the said coal controller ..... submissions one must look at the relevant provisions of the colliery control order. it must be remembered that the colliery control order is passed under the essential commodities act. the purpose being that the production, sale and distribution of certain commodities, which are considered to be essential, should be controlled by the central government. the ..... calcutta high court dated 20th march, 1998.2. briefly stated the facts are as follows:in pursuance of the power under section 3 of the essential commodities act, 1955 the colliery control order was framed. under clause 12a of the colliery control order the central government could by notification specify the authorities competent to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1996 (SC)

Rita Markandey Vs. Surjit Singh Arora

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)868; AIR1997SC2174; 1996(2)ALT(Cri)751; 1997CriLJ2503; JT1996(6)SC590; 1996(7)SCALE275; (1996)6SCC14; [1996]Supp7SCR56; 1996(2)LC787(SC)

..... of justice by resorting to the filing of false evidence, commits criminal contempt of the court and renders himself liable to be dealt with in accordance with the act.14. the above observations dovetail into the facts of the instant case, for there cannot be any manner of doubt that by filing false affidavits the respondent had ..... held guilty of contempt of court, notwithstanding non-furnishing of the under-taking, if it is found that the representation was false and the respondent never intended to act upon it. however, the respondent herein cannot be held liable for contempt on this score also for the order in question clearly indicates that it was passed on ..... sanction a particular course of action or inaction on the basis of the representation of such a party and the court ultimately finds that the party never intended to act on such representation or such representation was false. in other words, if on the representation of the respondent herein the court was persuaded to pass the order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2000 (SC)

Har Kiran Commar Vs. Delhi Admn. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2000(7)SCALE582; (2001)1UPLBEC25

..... be equitable to allow the land acquisition to go on in respect of this property. he, therefore, sought permission to file an application under section 48 of the land acquisition act. in response to this submission learned solicitor general of india filed written submission as follows [as recorded in the judgment dated 18th august 2000].in a case where the joint ..... to the notification under section 4. it is made expressly clear that even those transferees who have acquired the land with permissions/nocs under the delhi land (restrictions on transfer) act, 1972 are not covered by this.(b) the construction has been made after obtaining the approval of the mcd for the building plans.(c) the constructions as exists is in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2002 (SC)

Baldev Singh Vs. Surinder Mohan Sharma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC225; 2003(2)ALT40(SC); JT2002(9)SC235; (2003)1SCC34; 2003(1)LC61(SC); 2003(2)WLN658

..... a direct cause of action in the matter involving respondent no.3, who has grabbed his house illegally, hence, petitioner is aggrieved of the illegal acts of respondent no.3. since the authorities were trying to act in accordance with the law in deciding representations moved by the petitioner and now these are being scuttled by him in (sic) with the other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2009 (SC)

G. Varalakshmi and anr. Vs. G. Srinivsa Rao (D) Thru Lrs. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(5)ALT61(SC); JT2009(13)SC622; 2010(2)MhLJ81(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)478; 2009(10)SCALE733; (2009)9SCC48

..... be any doubt or dispute that the defendants herein could be entitled to equal share of the property of srinivasa rao in terms of section 8 of the hindu succession act. we would however, make it clear that in these proceedings we are concerned with the properties left at the hands of g.r. kuppusamy naidu. the learned counsel, however ..... which the suit has been instituted but can also be subsequently enforced by a female, if she comes within the purview of the proviso appended to section 23 of the act.27. however, on account of death of respondent no. 3, unmarried sister of the parties, the said question no. 1 had become academic in nature and it was ..... class i of the schedule and his or her property includes a dwelling-house wholly occupied by members of his or her family, then, notwithstanding anything contained in this act, the right of any such female heir to claim partition of the dwelling house shall not arise until the male heirs choose to divide their respective shares therein; but .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2008 (SC)

Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(3)JKJ1(1)[SC]; JT2008(8)SC159; 2008(10)SCALE60; (2008)9SCC368; 2008AIRSCW5157

..... more. it had no bearing whatsoever as to right of ownership, inheritance or title to the property. in our opinion, therefore, neither the authorities under the tenancy act nor the high court could have entered into question of ownership, title or inheritance in the present proceedings and they ought to have decided the controversy limited to ..... court in appropriate proceedings.18. it is clear from the record that grievance of respondent no. 2 daughter related to mutation entry. if the authorities under the tenancy act felt that the action was in consonance with law, it could have retained the entry. the inquiry, however, was limited to the entry in revenue records and nothing ..... counsel for the parties, in our opinion, the high court was not justified in entering into larger question in view the controversy before the authorities under the tenancy act. from the facts stated above, it is clear that land was allotted to makhan singh as a displaced person and in jamabandi 1966-67, his name was .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 2006 (SC)

Government of A.P. and anr. Vs. Y. Surender Reddy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2446; 2006(3)CTC508; [2006(110)FLR628]; 2006(6)SCALE321; (2006)10SCC207

..... rival submissions, it is necessary to set out certain background facts of this case:the respondent herein filed the, application under section 19 of the administrative tribunal act, 1985 on the file of the andhra pradesh administrative tribunal, hyderabad praying for a direction to the appellant to consider his case for appointment of assistant motor vehicle ..... this order. no costs.7. the appellant purportedly in implementation of the impugned order took up the case of the respondent on the ground that act 14 of 1997 of the andhra pradesh legislature prohibits the corporation employees from being absorbed in government. in fact the contention of the respondent is that the ..... act 14 of 1997 has no application sine it says that the absorption of public sector undertaking employees is prohibited only on the ground that the undertaking .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2006 (SC)

Official Trustee of West Bengal Vs. Stephen Court Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(14)SCALE285

..... dies before taking possession or applying for a grant of administration, is not a 'beneficial interest' within the meaning of section 4 of the succession and probate duties act 1892 to 1955 (queensland) [commissioner of stamp duties (queensland) v. lingston (1965) ac 694. 25. in 'bouvier's law dictionary and concise encclopedia' ..... subsequent document i.e. debenture trust deed?c) whether the originating summons filed by the appellant was maintainable?12. the 1913 act was enacted to consolidate and amend the law constituting the office of official trustee. an official trustee is appointed by the government. rights, powers, duties ..... which in view of the rival contentions of the parties arise for consideration are:a) whether the application made by the respondent under the official trustee act, 1925 to the calcutta high court was maintainable?b) whether the defect of unregistered document assigning lease of immovable property stood cured by registration of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //