Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Apr-23-1994
Reported in : 1996CriLJ483
..... on his testimony. in our opinion therefore, the prosecution had not been able to establish beyond doubt that any recovery of articles under section 27 of the evidence act was made.30. the last and most important circumstance relied upon by the prosecution was regarding the extra judicial confession made to the witnesses. except smt. tarawati and ..... that no extra judicial confession was made by the accused nor any recovery was made on the pointing of the accused. if such confession was made, the first act which the investigating officer could have done, was to interrogate the accused.27. shatroghan p.w. 4 is one of the witnesses of fard recovery of the aforesaid ..... 'ble supreme court has laid down that as a rule of prudence which was sanctioned itself to the rule of law, the courts, do look for corroboration before acting upon the retracted confession. it has been observed :'the judicial confessions are those which are made before a magistrate or in court in due course of legal proceedings .....
Tag this Judgment!