Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 39 signing in blank and failure to report Page 100 of about 1,934 results (0.790 seconds)

Feb 21 2018 (HC)

Sushma Jain vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... union of india & anr., has taken the same view.12. having regard to the aforesaid position, the captioned writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act as per the directions contained in the aforementioned judgments. w.p. (c) 1663/2018,1669/2018 page 3 of 4 13. it is made clear that the directions contained ..... exim pvt. ltd., these petitioners are inclined to approach registrar of companies voluntarily to seek its striking off from the registrar of companies under section 248(2) of the companies act, 2013. 10.1 furthermore, the petitioners seek to take benefit of the condonation of delay scheme 2018 as was permitted by another single judge of this court vide a ..... .1 the stand of the respondents, is that, this list, which includes the names of the petitioners has been prepared in consonance with section 164(2)(a) of the companies act, 2013. w.p. (c) 1663/2018,1669/2018 page 2 of 4 9. to be noted, except for the petitioner in wp(c) 1663/2018, the other petitioner is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2018 (HC)

Dabur Enclave (S R Block a ) Rawta More Residents Welfare Association ...

Court : Delhi

..... the guidelines and policy framed for regularisation of unauthorized colonies and the provisions of national capital territory of laws (special provisions) second act, 2011; and d) issue a writ in the- nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondent no.l to take final decision with respect to regularisation of ..... petitioner association; and c) issue a writ in the nature of declaration declaring the act of the respondents in threatening to take action for demolition in respect of the properties of the members of the petitioner association as being in violation of ..... to abide by the policy and guidelines framed in respect of unauthorized colonies and the provisions of national capital territory of delhi laws (special provisions) second act, 2011 and not to take any contrary and arbitrary action of pick and choose of demolition/ dispossession in respect of the properties of the members of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2018 (HC)

Varun Makkar and Anr. Vs.registrar of Companies, Nct of Delhi and Hary ...

Court : Delhi

..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within four weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of four weeks from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... 3.2. counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive isbl, they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2018 (HC)

Azad Kumar Bhura vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within two weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... 3.2 counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive (cbh), they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioners would also like to avail the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2018 (HC)

Sajal Kumar Tripathi vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within two weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... 3.2. counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioner does not wish to revive (akst), he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would also like to avail the benefit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2018 (HC)

Mr. Mahender Kumar Khandelwal vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the scheme.15. in addition thereto, for the moment, respondent no.w.p.(c) 844/2018 page 3 of 4 1/registrar of companies will also ..... will apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioner as well.13. the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the scheme within a period of two weeks from today.14. in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned list (annexure p-1), insofar ..... 8. it is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner wishes to take recourse to the provision of section 248(2) of the companies act, 2013 (in short the act) 9. furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the w.p.(c) 844/2018 page 2 of 4 petitioner would also like to avail of the benefit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2018 (HC)

Sushma Chadha vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within two weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... therein will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... since the petitioner does not wish to revive gces, she would take steps under section 248 (2) of w.p.(c)1937/2018 page 2 of 3 the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would also like to avail the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2018 (HC)

Apoorv Ranjan Sharma & Anr. Vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within two weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... . 4.2 counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive pavc, they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2018 (HC)

Manoj Gupta vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within ten days from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of ten days from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... 4.2. counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioner does not wish to revive ukuya, he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would also like to avail the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2018 (HC)

Sandeep Jain & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within ten days from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of ten days from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... petitioners do not wish to revive impl and iapl, they would take steps under section 248 w.p.(c) 2051/2018 page 2 of 4 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //