Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 39 signing in blank and failure to report Court: supreme court of india Page 4 of about 254 results (0.149 seconds)

Jul 27 2017 (SC)

Altab Gharami @ Atlab Sk Vs. The State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... dewan (pw 1) herein. as a result, some of the tiles were damaged. at that time dalil dewan (pw 2), father of the informant, intervened and raised objection against illegal acts of the accused. as a result, the appellants being armed with sharp cutting weapons entered into the house of informant and attacked p.w-2, father of the informant, resulting ..... ) cut injury of the hypothener over extending to the medial wrist 4 x 1 vessel and muscle cut injury was repaired. to reiterate, the appellants who have involved in substantial act of inflicting blow on the head causing crack table of skull and impairment of the right index finger using dangerous weapons, are 4 rightly held by the high court that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2019 (SC)

b.s.n.l. Vs. Pramod v. Sawant

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... prosecution be necessary. while a public servant holding an office of the kind mentioned in the section is as such public servant appointed to another office, his official acts in connection with the latter office will also relate to the former office. the words removable from office occurring in section 197 signify removal from the office he ..... not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the government is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction (a) in the case of ..... leading to the impugned order assailed in the present appeal. in the writ petition, the appellants gave up their challenge on grounds of limitation and inapplicability of the act which has therefore attained finality. the challenge in the writ petition is confined to the question of sanction only.3. the high court relying on mohd. hadi raja .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 06 2019 (SC)

M/S. Oriental Kuries Ltd. Rep. By Its Chairman P. D. Jose Vs. Lissa

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... fund in question, 3 since the same was started from mangalore, karnataka. the appellant being a trading company, was exempted under section 13(1)(e) of the companies act, 1956 from specifying the states to which the objects would extend in the memorandum and articles of association. reliance was placed by the single judge on the full bench ..... interest of all other subscribers, and the entire mechanism of the chit fund system would collapse.11. a perusal of the provisions of chapter v of the 1982 act makes it clear that if a prized subscriber defaults in making payment of an installment, the chit foreman has the right to recover the amount covering all future ..... payment from a defaulting prized subscriber under section 32 unless he makes a demand to that effect in writing. (2) where a dispute is raised under this act by a foreman for a consolidated payment of future subscriptions from a defaulting prized subscriber and if the subscriber pays to the foreman on or before the date to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2000 (SC)

Kali Prasad and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2000(8)SC503; 2000(5)SCALE368; (2000)6SCC640; [2000]Supp1SCR702

..... of those sections are attracted here. the effect of section 1(2) is that the provisions would become part of 1952 act from its inception. it follows that respondents 3 and 4 acquired right to succession of bal karan.12. it is next contended that inasmuch as the civil suit was barred in view of the provisions of section 331 ..... another contention of mr. swarup is that sister's sons of bal karan became heirs only on the passing of the u.p. zamindari abolition & land reforms (amendment) act, 1958 and it cannot be given retrospective effect.10. the amendment act was passed in 1958. the question whether that act was retrospective in nature, was considered by a division bench of ..... , read with schedule ii of the u.p. zamindari act, any finding recorded by the civil court could not be taken note of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 2013 (SC)

T.C. Gupta Vs. Bimal Kumar Dutta and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... event his explanations were to be found unacceptable. the explanation to section 12 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, makes it clear that an apology tendered by a contemnor should not be rejected merely on the ground that it is qualified or conditional so long it is ..... contemnor guilty of commission of contempt by understanding the order dated 18.08.2011 to mean status quo or a restraint in respect of grant of licences under the haryana act of 1975.11. in an earlier part of the present order, we have noticed the unqualified and unconditional apology tendered by the appellant before the high court in the ..... in which he had understood the order dated 18.08.2011, namely, that the said order had not placed any kind of prohibition on grant of licences under the haryana act of 1975. yet, out of deference to the order of high court, no licence either for group housing or commercial activities in either sector 63-a or 67-a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2019 (SC)

Union of India Vs. Bgp Products Operations Gmbh and Hagene Immermatt W ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 2015. the nlem is published under the 1st schedule to the drugs (prices) control order, 2013 ( dpco ) under section 3 of the essential commodities act, 1955 ( ec act ). the nlem specifies the recommended dosage and strength of oxytocin injection as 5iu per 1 ml and 10iu per 3 1 ml. oxytocin injection in the ..... for further discussion. after deliberations, the dcc recommended that the manufacture and sale of oxytocin injections should be banned for veterinary use under section 26a of the act coupled with the condition that the manufacturers of the bulk drug oxytocin should supply the active 8 pharmaceutical ingredient ( api ) only to licensed manufacturers of ..... issue was under deliberation by the drugs technical advisory board ( dtab ) and the drugs consultative committee ( dcc ), which are statutory bodies constituted under the said act. 2 executive summary, report of the core committee for revision of the national list of essential medicines published in 2015. 3 paragraph 3.1(ii) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2020 (SC)

The Karad Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd Vs. Swwapnil Bhingardevay

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to another company by name, sarvadnya industries private limited, and that a bank 6 by name, janata sahkari bank limited, pune had taken possession of the same under the sarfaesi act; and (iv) that even the advertisement issued by the resolution professional on 30.03.2018 inviting expression of interest, was vitiated in as much as the invitation contained therein was ..... . it was not his case at all that the resolution plan was 19 submitted by the sra after the last date, but the same was predated by the resolution professional acting in collusion.32. it appears from the impugned order of nclat that only in the course of hearing of the appeal, the date 09th february 2019 type written at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2021 (SC)

Sonu @ Subhash Kumar Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... summarise the legal position that emerges from the above cases, the consent of a woman with respect to section 375 must involve an active and reasoned deliberation towards the proposed act. to establish whether the consent was vitiated by a misconception of fact arising out of a promise to marry, two propositions must be established. the promise of marriage must have ..... at the time it was given. the false promise itself must be of immediate relevance, or bear a direct nexus to the woman s decision to engage in the sexual act. 11 bearing in mind the tests which have been enunciated in the above decision, we are of the view that even assuming that all the allegations in the fir are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2021 (SC)

Anant Raj Ltd. ( Formerly Anant Raj Industries Ltd.) Vs. The State Of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... applicable in such licence cases. the applications for grant of licence are accordingly considered on merits of the case and as per provisions laid down in the act of 1975 and rules made thereunder. however, the government is seized of the matter and devising an alternate transparent system for the purpose is under active ..... & validity of applications for grant of license. . accordingly, in accordance with the powers conferred under section 9 a of the haryana development and regulation of urban area act, 1975, the governor of haryana is pleased to pronounce the following policy parameters in this regard: (i) in the towns/urban areas falling in hyper & high ..... manesar urban complex for perspective year 2025 will be published as per section 5(4) of the punjab schedule roads and controlled areas restriction of unregulated development act, 1963 for inviting the objections and suggestions. though a person can apply on the basis of the draft development plan 2025 after publication in the official .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2022 (SC)

Sardar Meena Vs. The State Of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... proceedings in regard to an offense involving moral turpitude is pending trial in a court of law and such person shall stand debarred from taking part in any act or proceeding of the panchayati raj institution concerned while being under such suspension.6. it is respondents own case that they had made their preliminary inquiry not ..... as may be deemed necessary, remove from office any member including a chairperson or a deputy chairperson of a panchayati raj institution, who- (a) refuses to act or becomes incapable of acting as such; or (b) is guilty of misconduct in the discharge of duties or any disgraceful conduct: xxx xxx xxx (4) the state government may ..... , rural development and panchayati raj department, government of rajasthan on 24.05.2021. a preliminary enquiry was initiated under section 38(1) of the rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 read with rule 22(2) of the rajasthan panchayati raj rules, 1996 and a charge sheet was issued on 16.06.2021. the appellant was suspended .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //