Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 23 disobedience to superior officer Court: rajasthan Page 3 of about 100 results (0.277 seconds)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2007ACJ60

..... high court in case of new india assurance co. ltd. v. babasaheb anna mali : air2002bom27 . however, with introduction of section 147(1)(b)(i) of the motor vehicles act, 1988, the high courts are firmly of the view that under the said section the insurance company would be liable to indemnify the owner of the vehicle which was insured ..... also been expressed by the hon'ble karnataka high court in case of oriental insurance co. ltd. v. minaxi 2000 acj 385 (karnataka). noticing the change in new motor vehicles act, a similar view has also been held by the hon'ble kerala high court in case of united india insurance co. ltd. v. appukuttan .10. in the present case ..... liability of the insurance company is a limited one. however, such is not the case in this appeal. on the date of the accident, the new act was already in force. under the said act, the liability of the insurance company is unlimited. hence, the contention of the learned counsel is without merit.13. on the factual matrix, the case .....

Chandra Kumar Vs. Smt. Kanku Bai and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1991WLN(UC)324

..... of residence and not for running printing press. dr. gopal dass verma v. dr. s.k. bhardwaj : [1962]2scr678 , relates to a case governed by delhi rent control act and residential premises were also used with the consent of the landlord for professional purpose. in section kartar singh v. chatnan lal and ors. : [1970]1scr9 , premises were ..... decreeing the suit for ejectment on the ground mentioned in clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the rajasthan premises (control of rent & eviction) act, 1950 without any pleading and issue, simply on the basis of the admission of the defendant and all his witnesses that a* residential house in sector 11, hiren magri, ..... alteration has been effected in it and the ground of default has ceased to exist as amount of rent and interest determined under section 13(3) of the act was duly deposited in time and amount equivalent to monthly rent was being regularly deposited. the plaintiff-respondent filed an appeal. it was heard and decided by the .....

Sheela Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : II(2006)ACC390

..... to the appellant.3. initially, the claimants mahaveer and smt. sheela, parents of deceased sandeep jain filed an application for compensation under sections 166 and 140 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 before the motor accident claims tribunal, bundi a in respect of death of sandeep jain in an accident, which took place on 24.5.1990 arising out of use .....

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2005(4)Raj2863; 2006(1)WLC40

..... been expressed by the hon'ble karnataka high court in case of oriental insurance company limited v. minaxi (air 2000 karnataka 73). noticing the change in the new motor vehicles act, a similar view has also been held by the hon'ble kerala high court in case of united india insurance co. ltd. v. appukuttan .10. in the present case, ..... of new india assurance co. ltd. v. babasaheb anna mali and ors. (2002(1) tac 47 (bom.) however with introduction of section 147(1)(b)(i) of the motor vehicles act, 1988, the high courts are firmly of the view that under the said section the insurance company would be liable to indemnify the owner of the vehicle which was insured ..... liability of the insurance company is a limited one. however, such is not the case in this appeal. on the date of the accident, the new act was already in force. under the said act, the liability of the insurance company is unlimited. hence the contention of the learned counsel is without merit.13. on the factual matrix, the case of .....

Udai Singh Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the situation slipped out of his control and it went to the fatal extent. he would not have intended to inflict the injuries which she sustained on account of his act. therefore, we are persuaded to bring down the offence from the firs.degree murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. 8. we, therefore, alter the conviction from ..... to save her from the tongues of flames. this conduct cannot be seen divorced from the totality of the circumstances. very probably he would not have anticipated that the act done by him would have escalated to such a proportion that she might die. if he had ever intended her to die he would not have alerted his senses ..... is as follows: 6. we find no good reason to discard the 10 two dying declarations given by the deceased regarding the actual occurrence. the courts below have rightly acted on such dying declarations. 7. but then, what is the nature of the offence proved against him. it is an admitted case that appellant was in a highly inebriated .....

Rajasthan Rajya Sahakari Upbhokta Sangh (Confed) Ltd. Vs. Rent Control ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2748

..... rent tribunal to entertain a petition involving such dispute between landlord and tenant to which provisions of the rajasthan public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1964 (act no. 2 of 1965) and the rajasthan premises (requisition and eviction) ordinance, 1949 apply.(2) where the petition only for recovery of ..... the parties, therefore, the present petition filed against the interim order is not maintainable.18. petitioner has got other alternative efficacious remedy under the act and without availing alternative efficacious remedy the petitioner cannot file the present petition.19. learned counsel for the respondents also referred the provisions of section ..... section 3 (x)are not applicable to the petitioner federation and the petitioner federation is only a cooperative society registered under the rajasthan cooperative society act and the entire administration is vested in the board of directors.6. the rent tribunal, jaipur framed the issue, which reads as under:........7 .....

Narendra Kumar Kamboj Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2007(3)WLN452

..... of haryana v. om prakash and anr. (1968) 8 scc 733, the hon'ble apex court explained the distinction between 'retrenchment' and 'abandonment' from service, observing that termination contemplates an act on the part of the employer which puts an end to service to fall within the definition of the expression 'retrenchment' and in case the workman does not report for .....

Tej Singh Vs. Bank of Rajasthan and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... is claimed, civil court will have jurisdiction. three judges bench of hon'ble apex court in case of rajasthan state road transport corporation & anr. v/s. bal mukund bairwa (2) [(2009) 4 scc299 has observed that the question of jurisdiction is to be addressed, having regard to the facts of the case and ..... settlement. despite such a situation, the appellant has ventilated his grievances against the impugned action of the respondent which emanated from bipartite settlement in terms of act of 1947. hon'ble apex court in the premier automobiles ltd.(supra) examined the issue relating to jurisdiction of civil court in relation to industrial disputes ..... governed by bipartite settlement dated 17th november, 1980, which was arrived at between union of bank employees and the 6 management, in terms of provisions of act of 1947. in that background, the order, whereby appellant was debarred from participating in the process for promotion/recruitment, the embargo envisaged under the bipartite settlement .....

Akhilesh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2205; RLW2009(1)Raj746

..... case depends on circumstantial evidence. but in circumstantial evidence also when the facts are clear it is immaterial that no motive has been proved. men do not act wholly without motive. failure to discover the motive of the offence does not signify the non-existence of the crime. the failure to discover motive by appropriate ..... of maharashtra : 1992crilj1545 , has held that in circumstantial evidence also when the facts are clear it is immaterial that no motive has been proved. men do not act wholly without motive. failure to discover the motive of the offence does not signify the non-existence of the crime. the failure to discover motive by appropriate clinching ..... within the definition of 'dowry' and cannot be construed as demand of dowry within the definition of 'dowry' as defined under the provisions of the dowry prohibition act. he further contended that there is allegation about mortgage of kisan vikas patra which were in the name of deceased kavita and demand of four lac rupees by .....

Sharvan Lal and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2(2006)DMC534

..... clause of section 107, ipc and not clause secondly and thirdly. in paras 14 and 15 it has been held as under:14. it is beyond doubt that seema did commit suicide. undisputedly, such suicide has been committed within a year of the date of marriage. what happened on the date of occurrence is very material for ..... the evidence their lordships in paras 20 and 21 have held as under:20. instigation is to goad, urge forward, provoke, incite or encourage to do 'an act'. to satisfy the requirement of instigation though it is not necessary that actual words must be used to that effect or what constitutes instigation must necessarily and specifically be suggestive ..... by the appellants. as their lordships in ramesh kumar's case (supra) in paras 20 and 21 have laid down the exception where the accused persons by their acts, omissions and commissions and by continued course of conduct created such circumstances that deceased is left with no other option except to commit suicide. a case of instigation may .....