Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... the applicant, they were levelling false charges against him. it is also disclosed in the complaint that divorce petition was filed against sau. kaberi under section 13 of hindu marriage act on 15.05.2002 before the learned additional district judge, 5th court, barasat, north 24 paraganas in west bengal, which was decreed on 15.05.2002, and the marriage has .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... absence of the petitioner on 17/2/2011 when the tribunal took up the matter is not on account of genuine and bona fide reasons rather than it is an act of protracting the litigation which has been rightly inferred by the tribunal and accordingly proceeded under rule 15 of the epf procedure rules."therefore, as can be seen from ..... dated 17/8/200 passed under section 7-a of the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952. by the said order, the petitioner was also asked to make a remittances for the period 1/3/1998 to 31/7/2000. the petitioner also received the ..... order the appeal filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed and resultantly the order passed under section 7-a and 14b of the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 came to be confirmed.3. shorn of unnecessary details, a few facts can be stated thus -the petitioner was held to be accessible by virtue of the order .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... unpaid with the endorsement "funds insufficient" . accordingly, after recording the verification, the learned jmfc issued summons to the petitioner herein under section 138 of n.i.act by order passed on 9.1.2006. 5) the petitioner herein (original accused) pursuant to the said summons appeared in the said matter and original complainant filed an affidavit of ..... the original complainant, which has filed the criminal complaint (exhibit a, page 9) on 21.12.2005 against the petitioner herein (original accused) under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act before the learned jmfc, chopada, district jalgaon in respect of alleged dishonour of cheque no.108452 for an amount of rs.2,72,000, since the said cheque was returned .....
Tag this Judgment!