Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 2 definitions Page 16 of about 131,030 results (0.478 seconds)

P. Paliwal and ors. Vs. Hindustan Zinc Limited and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

..... not regulatory in nature. for vesting of undertaking in hzl, the undertaking of the mci was taken over by the government of india by the act of 1965, act of 1966 and act of 1976 and then undertaking was transferred to hzl. in jialal kapur's case, the division bench of this court was influenced by the ..... the respondent is that the respondent-company is engaged in commercial activity. the commercial activity itself is not a decisive factor nor body's registration under the companies act itself is decisive. the decisive criteria as already referred and discussed above, clearly proves the respondent to be 'other authority' within the meaning of article 12 ..... its functions and activities. the respondent-company raised preliminary objection that the respondent-hindustan zinc limited (for short 'hzl') is merely a company registered under the companies act, 1956 and it is not state within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution of india and, therefore, no writ lies against it. in support of .....

Sri Mohibur Rahman Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

..... specially indicating the place where the dead body was buried in presence of mohibur can be treated as post-crime conduct relevant under section 8 of the indian evidence act. we have considered the evidence of the five prosecution witnesses on this point and, under no circumstances, we find any reason to disbelieve their version rendered with ..... dead body of urshia but instead of the dead body the articles by which her body was wrapped were found. the provisions of section 27 of the evidence act are based on the view that if a fact is actually discovered in consequence of information given' some guarantee is afforded thereby that the information was true and ..... mohibur rahman. this piece of evidence relating to leading to the discovery of the dead body as observed above is not admissible under section 27 of the indian evidence act, 1872. a statement made by an accused person while in police custody for the purpose of section 27 should be clearly and carefully recorded by the concerned police .....

Sandip Arjun Vazarkar Vs. Scrutiny Committee for Verification of Caste ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2371

..... given to petitioner without any application of mind by the authorities. the authorities like talathi did not record any statements of the neighbours or relatives and acted only on affidavit filed by petitioner and information supplied by him. we find that his application therefor was itself incomplete and could not have been entertained ..... particulars for verification /investigation at the earliest to the scrutiny committee or the pi, porvorim. the evidence on record clearly shows that the petitioner was acting malafide and was improving his case from time to time. the finding of the scrutiny committee in the present circumstances, cannot be said to be either ..... out to urge that it does not overrule the view of learned single judge and takes other view of the matter only because of subsequent enactment i.e. act no. xxiii of 2001 i.e. maharashtra scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, de-notified tribes, (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category .....

Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Cooperative L and C Society Limited Vs. Food Cor ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2000)126PLR110

..... 'archaic', 'primitive' and of 'baneful nature', the system which is nothing but an improved version of bonded labour, is sought to be abolished by contract labour regulation and abolition act, 1970. this act is an important piece of social legislation for the welfare of labourers and has to be liberally construed.' in the karnatka contract labour and transport cooperative society limited and .....

Dilip @ Bhola Vs. the State of Rajasthan Through P.P.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : II(2006)DMC300; RLW2006(3)Raj2115; 2006(2)WLC743

..... that firstly the burden lies on the prosecution to prove the husband's guilt beyond reasonable doubt before assuming presumption against him under section 113-b of the evidence act.9. learned public prosecutor, on the other hand, contended that the learned trial court has considered the oral and documentary evidence and rightly convicted and sentenced the ..... bring it within the purview of 'death occurring otherwise than in normal circumstances'. the expression 'soon before' is very relevant where section 113-b of the evidence act and section 304-b ipc are pressed into service. the prosecution is obliged to show that soon before the occurrence there was cruelty or harassment and only in ..... has been indicated and the expression 'soon before' is not defined. a reference to the expression 'soon before' used in section 114 illustration (a) of the evidence act is relevant. it lays down that a court may presume that a man who is in the possession of goods 'soon after the theft is either the thief or .....

Rai Singh Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2009(2)WLN404

..... presence is accepting much coincidence which is not warranted or corroborated by any other circumstance or evidence.22. reading together sections 25 and 27 of the indian evidence act, it is clear that no confession made before a police officer can be proved against a person accused of an offence,-as such plain confession made before a ..... the persons said to have met soon after the incident to accused and prosecution has declared them hostile. krishna kumar pw 2, bhopal singh pw 9 and veer bal pw 10 are the motbirs of recoveries and site inspection etc. pw 11 sho and pw 7 circle officer are investigating officers, whereas jai singh pw 4 constable ..... confessional statement even first information report can be given by the accused received as an evidence except to the extent it is permitted by section 27 of the evidence act, that is to the extent leads to discovery of some fact.26. so, position regarding admissible of first information report by accused himself is very clear-not necessarily .....

Sarmus Sab Vs. IsmaIn Sab (Deceased by L.Rs.) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2006Kant107

..... circumstances to determine what was intended.2) if a transaction embodied in the document takes place after the amendment to section 58(c) of the transfer of property act by act 20 of 1929, and if the sale and agreement to re-purchase are embodied in separate documents that the transaction is not a mortgage.i) if the transaction ..... holding that plaintiff being the brother of kasimsab has interest in getting the property redeemed in view of the provisions of section 91(a) of the transfer of property act. both the courts below have held concurrently on the question of fact that the first defendant has failed to prove that kasimsab has left behind the wife rabia bi ..... as the document is a usufructuary mortgage condition imposed therein which is clog on redemption is void in view of the provisions of section 60 of the transfer of property act. being aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, the first defendant preferred ra. no. 48/99 on the file of addl. civil judge (sr. dn.) bellary, and .....

Punjab Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. G.T. Agencies

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)151PLR496

..... revision petition and would set-aside the impugned order, whereby the lower appellate court, has framed issue to decide the application under section 5 of the limitation act. while allowing this revision petition, the delay in filing the appeal would stand condoned with direction to the court to decide the appeal against the ex-parte ..... fraud one gains at the loss of another. even most solemn proceedings stand vitiated if they are actuated by fraud. fraud is, thus, is an extrinsic collateral act which vitiates all judicial acts, whether in rem or in personam. in india bank v. satyam fibres (india) pvt. ltd. : air1996sc2592 while referring to lazarus estates and smith v. ..... .2007, the respondent herein filed an application for framing an additional issue regarding the competency of a person filing the application under section 5 of the limitation act. the court, after receiving reply to this application, viewed that issue about the locus of ajit singh son of late shri daljit singh to file the .....

Bellachi (Dead) by Lr Vs. Pakeeran

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2009SC3298; 2009(2)AWC1722(SC); JT2009(4)SC298; (2009)6MLJ1034(SC); 2009(5)SCALE82; 2009(4)LC1844(SC); 2009AIRSCW3458; 2009(5)LHSC3011

..... , undue influence etc. is vitiated by any illegality, omission or error or defect as envisaged under section 100 of code of civil procedure.15. section 16 of the indian contract act provides for as to what constitutes undue influence. relationship between the parties so as to enable one of them to dominate the will of the other is a sine qua .....

The Hatti Gold Mines Limited, Represented by Its Managing Director Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant264; 2005(2)ARBLR528(Kar); ILR2005KAR1777; 2005(3)KarLJ502

..... , the applicant is entitled to deduct the time taken in getting the certified copy or other required documents from the court.27. under section 43 of the act, the limitation act 1963 is made applicable to arbitrations as it applies to proceedings in court. the kerala high court in anas abdul khadeer v. abdul nasar, 2001(2) ..... agreement would be valid. if such a contract is clear, unambiguous and explicit and not vague, it is not hit by sections 23 and 28 of the contract act. this cannot be understood as parties contracting against the statute. mercantile law and practice permit such agreements'. thus there cannot be any doubt that when the parties agree ..... to the facts and circumstances of this case.5. the learned counsel appearing for the appellant cited several judgments mainly to contend that section 14 of the limitation act. is applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case and under the said provision the period during which the proceeding was pending before the wrong court could .....