Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 2 definitions Court: madhya pradesh Page 3 of about 2,643 results (0.133 seconds)

Ochi Bai and ors. Vs. Munna Lal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2003ACJ1811

..... in a case all relevant factors including the appropriate multiplier are to be kept in mind. the position is well settled that the second schedule under section 163a to the act which gives the amount of compensation to be determined for the purpose of claim under the section can be taken as a guideline while determining the compensation under section 166 ..... of the act. in that view of the matter, there is no reason why multiplier of 17 should not be taken as the appropriate multiplier in this case.12. considering the aforesaid judgments .....

Dwarka Prasad Yadav Vs. Principal Secretary the State of Madhya Prades ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... 6th battalion, vide present writ petition seeks direction to consider him for out of turn promotion in terms of the provisions of rule 56(3) of the m.p.vishesh sashastra bal niyam, 1973. claim for out of turn promotion is mounted on the incident which took place on 21.4.1999 while the petitioner was on duty as security guard member ..... situations or in some other field of duty an incumbent is not entitled for benefit under rule 56(3) of the rules 1973. in case at hand petitioner's alleged act of bravery has prima facie been viewed as a crime leading to registration of an offence and unless cleared of from the stigma he has no vested right to seek .....

Deepak and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... -4), sister of the deceased and rekha (pw-3) aunt of the deceased have turned hostile. they did not allege anything about the cruelty. under such circumstances, when the overt-acts of the appellants do not fall within the purview of section 107 of ipc, no offence under section 306 of ipc is made out against the appellants.18. in the ..... as stated by the witnesses do not fall within the purview of section 107 of ipc.17. it is true that the presumption under section 113- a of the evidence act is applicable in the present case, but the presumption is rebuttable, and therefore it was for the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that a cruelty was done to the deceased ..... factual position of the present case is considered, then it would be apparent that no case under section 498-a of ipc is made out against the appellants. no overt-act of the appellants is proved to show that they dealt with the deceased with cruelty so that she could commit suicide. under such circumstances, the overt .....

Sanjay and anr. Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... deceased and one unknown person. it is no where stated by the witness sharda prasad that any third person intervened in that scuffling and therefore, no overt act of the appellant no.2 was established to prove his common intention with the appellant sanjay and therefore, the appellant murli could not be convicted for the ..... after considering the evidence adduced by the parties the learned additional sessions judge acquitted the appellants from the charge of offence punishable under section 25 of the arms act and section 302 or 302 read with section 34 of i.p.c but, convicted the appellant sanjay for offence punishable under section 304 (part i) and ..... the blood found on the articles was human blood. after due investigation a charge sheet was filed before the special judge under sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act, betul. since at that time entire sessions court was notified as a special court therefore, the case was transferred to the iind additional sessions judge/special judge betul .....

Pawan Arora Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... healthy competition amongst the applicants aspiring for stage carriage permits; (vii) the impugned notice and the stipulations as contained therein besides being contrary to the act of 1988 and the judgment of hon'ble apex court in the case of mithilesh garg (supra), even otherwise is totally arbitrary and only to defeat ..... for consideration of applications for grant of permit. the petitioner in the rejoinder-affidavit has specifically stated that the aforesaid handmade procedure has never been acted upon earlier during the meetings scheduled from the years 1997 upto 15/10/2014 as applications submitted on the date of consideration have been duly considered ..... aforesaid submission made in the rejoinder-affidavit has not been controverted by the respondents/state. respondents have not been able to refer to any provisions of act of 1988 or the rules framed thereunder contrary to that. hence, the aforesaid procedure adopted by the respondent/state in the meeting scheduled for consideration .....

Chief Municipal Officer Vs. Mahila Munni Devi and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... together (fraus et jus nunquam cohabitant); or fraud and deceit ought to benefit none (fraus et dolus nemini patrocinari debent). 26. fraud may be defined as an act of deliberate deception with the design of securing some unfair or undeserved benefit by taking undue advantage of another. in lfaud one gains at the loss of another. ..... is obtained by fraud, it cannot be said to be a judgment or order in law. before three centuries, chief justice edward coke proclaimed: "fraud avoids all judicial acts, ecclesiastical or temporal." 22. it is thus settled proposition of law that a judgment, decree or order obtained by playing fraud on the court, tribunal or authority ..... and conditions that right of ownership was granted in favour of the respondent. in accordance with the provision of section 312 chapter xi of the m.p. municipalities act, 1961 the compromise can only be entered with the permission by the municipal council. no such permission was taken by the president and cmo of nagar panchayat .....

Mumtazul Karim Vs. Smt. Vikarun Nisha

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... making demand of payment of mehar, the same has not been paid to her. hence, on these premised submissions, present suit for dissolution of the marriage under the act of 1939 has been filed by the plaintiff.4. defendant-appellant except the facts which are admitted, denied the other plaint averments and specifically denied that his mother, sister ..... and they are :- (i) whether the factum of causing cruelty by defendant-appellant to plaintiff has been proved in stricto sensu in terms of section 2 (viii) of the act of 1939?. (ii) whether the defendant is not treating the plaintiff in like manner as he is treating his second wife ?. regarding question no.(i) 10. the argument ..... those reasonings recorded by the learned trial court. hence, according to me, the plaintiff is also entitled to a decree of dissolution under section 2(viii) of the act of 1939, which mandates that a decree of dissolution of marriage be passed if the husband has neglected or has failed to maintain his wife for a period of .....

State of Madhya Pradesh and Another Vs. Ramkishan and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... evidence, two things have to satisfy- 1. that original document is admissible in evidence. 2. that one of the condition enumerated in section 65 of the evidence act entitling to secondary evidence has been established. secondary evidence by document can be given if failure to produce the original document is supported by proper reasons. but in ..... there is no definite evidence of ill-treatment, having immediate proximity date of death of deceased. 13. as to presumption under section 113-b of evidence act the hon'ble supreme court has stated that proximate test applies and expression soon before the death occurring in this section does not indicate any fixed period. but ..... it within the purview of 'death occurring otherwise than in normal circumstances'. the expression 'soon before' is very relevant where section 113-b of the evidence act and section 304-b ipc are pressed into service. the prosecution is obliged to show that soon before the occurrence there was cruelty or harassment and only in .....

Parenteral Drugs (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ386

..... of executive/administrative directions, it is his prayer for quashing of such administrative directions and administrative directions cannot be allowed to violate fundamental rights. if an authority acts in an arbitrary manner, its action would be bad in law and liable to be quashed.40. for the foregoing reasons, this petition deserves to be allowed ..... i. v. fluids simply because it could manage to hire such machines on loan licence basis from another tenderer, judged by minimal standards of fairness, does this act of the respondents, though farthest exterior line of fairness, let alone stand its test?13. i. v. fluids for transfusion are generally used in emergencies. they ..... with the public, whether by way of giving jobs or entering into contracts or issuing quotas or licences or granting other forms of largess, the government cannot act arbitrarily at its sweet will and, like a private individual, deal with any person it pleases, but its action must be in conformity with standard or norm .....

BHEL Executives' Association and Anr. Vs. Chairman and Managing Direct ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1990MPLJ699

..... of reorganisation and transfer commenced immediately after 25th june, 1989 and the transfer of petitioner no. 2 incidentally coincided with close approximity with the alleged act of mass casual leave at the behest of the petitioner association and this led to the alleged misunderstanding of victimisation.20. the respondents have denied, supported ..... division and, therefore, his transfer to productivity and suggestion scheme department within a year is not in public interest but without any justification and an act of victimisation simply to put the petitioner no. 2 in an insignificant side line department.19. we have already discussed and found that no case ..... a direction to quash the same.2. the bharat heavy electricals limited, a public sector government of india undertaking, is a company registered under the companies act, 1956, having its registered headquarter at new delhi. it was established in 1956 and at present it is the largest engineering and manufacturing enterprise of its .....