Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 2 definitions Court: karnataka Page 3 of about 9,597 results (0.759 seconds)

Nov 20 2015 (HC)

Ranganatha Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... that the conviction in respect of the offence punishable under section 304b will be essentially based on the presumption available under section 113 (b) of the evidence act and therefore, imprisonment for life should be used in rare case and not in every case and consequently, the sentence of imprisonment for life reduced to ..... chain, bracelet and gold rings at the time of his marriage at gbb kalyanmantap, bengaluru, and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 3 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961? 4) whether the prosecution further proves beyond reasonable doubt that the accused being the husband of smt. nandini @ komala, daughter of complainant-ravindra, when ..... is opposed to law, facts and probabilities and there is no foundation for the offences alleged either under section 304b or section 4 of d.p. act. it is argued that important admissions elicited from the mouth of material witnesses have not been properly analyzed in right perspective and the learned judge has seriously .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2015 (HC)

Airport Authority Employees Union Vs. Union of Inida

Court : Karnataka

..... civil aviations. it was contended before the said tribunal that the said concession agreement was contrary to sections 31 and 32 of monopolies and restrictive practices act, 1969. the commission held that as the government of india has been a party to the concession agreement, the said agreement could not be stated ..... hal airport for commenrcial and for civil aviation use. these writ petitions having been heard and reserved, coming on for pronouncement of order this day, the acting chief justice pronounced the following: order these are public interest litigations, principally, challenging the decision dated may 16, 2008, of the ministry of civil aviation ..... by the3d respondent and not handed over to any other third party. in wp no.10389 of2008between the association of outsourcing professionals a society registered under the societies act, having its office at no.39/2, near dairy circle, sagar motors, bannerghatta road, bangalore-560 029, represented by its president sri.vivek kulkarni ... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2015 (HC)

Ranganatha S/O Late c.r Swamy Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... and gold rings at the time of his marriage at gbb kalyan mantap, bengaluru, and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 3 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961?.4) whether the prosecution further proves beyond reasonable doubt that the accused being the husband of smt.nandini @ komala, daughter of complainant-ravindra, when ..... strictly construed. dowry is a fairly well known social custom or practice i india. it is well settled principle of interpretation of statute that if the act is passed without reference to a particular trade, business or transaction and words are used which everybody conversant with trade, business or transaction knows or understands ..... the conviction in respect of the offence punishable under section 304b will be essentially based on the presumption available under section 113 (b) of the evidence act and therefore, imprisonment for life should be used in rare cases and not in every case and consequently, the sentence of imprisonment for life was reduced .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Srinivas V Vs. The Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Sharadamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Ferns Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Prakashnath Vs. State By Special Public Prosecutor

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Priyadarshini Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //