Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 2 definitions Court: chennai Page 10 of about 9,208 results (0.209 seconds)

Jan 23 2017 (HC)

Sathyanarayana Vs. T.J. Dhanakoti @ Koti

Court : Chennai

..... litigation cannot be allowed to be kept alive for a long time. 13. though the above observations are made in the proceedings under section 5 of the limitation act, those principles are applicable while considering the delay in representation of the papers. the delay of 477 days appears to be due to deliberate in action on the ..... kmar verma the respondents produced a false and fabricated certificate to defeat the claim of the respondent for transfer of a case. this action was found to be an act amounting to interference with the administration of justice. brother hansaria, j. speaking for the bench observed: (scc pp.423-24, paras 1 and 2) the stream of ..... false affidavit in court constitutes contempt. the hon ble supreme court has passed the orders as follows: 38. section 2(c) of the contempt of courts act, 1971 (for short the act) defines criminal contempt as the publication (whether by words, spoken or written or by signs or visible representation or otherwise) of any matter or the doing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 2016 (HC)

Advocates' Forum for Social Justice rep. by its President, Mr. K. Balu ...

Court : Chennai

..... of a writ of declaration, declaring the tamil nadu establishment of private law colleges (prohibition) act, 2014 (act 13 of 2014) as illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the constitution of india. prayer: petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for ..... under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of a writ of declaration, declaring the tamil nadu establishment of private law colleges (prohibition) act, 2014 (act 13 of 2014) as illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the constitution of india. prayer: petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance ..... under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of a writ of declaration, declaring the tamil nadu establishment of private law colleges (prohibition) act, 2014 (act 13 of 2014) as illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the constitution of india. prayer: petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2016 (HC)

Jambuveni Vs. Leelavathy and Others

Court : Chennai

..... (government of andhra pradesh and others vs. karri chinna venkata reddy and others), the hon'ble supreme court has held that as per sections 62 and 63 of indian evidence act, 1872, admission of secondary evidence is not permissible. vi. in air 1995 madhya pradesh 134 ( sitaram v. ram charan and others), it is held that entries in public records made ..... the proceeding and it operates as res judicata in a subsequent proceeding between the same parties. an exception to the said rule is engrafted by section 44 of the evidence act which provides that any party to a suit or other proceeding may show that any judgment, order, or decree, which is relevant under sections 40, 41 and 42, and which ..... (prayer: this appeal is preferred under order xxxvi rule 11 of o.s.rules r/w clause 15 of the letters patent act against the order of this court dated 9.2.2015 in c.s.diary no.31735 of 2014.) a. selvam, j. 1. this original side appeal has been directed against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2016 (HC)

P. Sudhakar and Others Vs. T.K. Govinda Raj and Others

Court : Chennai

..... with the obligation to test the bona fide of the reason placed by the litigant, which should not unnecessarily cause relative hardship. the provisions of the limitation act are not meant to destroy the rights of the parties, but they are meant to see that the parties do not resort to dilatory tactics. 16. the ..... there is no presumption that delay in approaching the court is always deliberate. this court has held that the words 'sufficient cause' under section 5 of the limitation act should receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice vide shakuntala devi jain vs. kuntal kumari (air 1969 sc 575) and state of west bengal v ..... as laid down in the decisions referred to above that in considering the application filed under section 5 of the limitation act, the court should exercise the discretionary power conferred under section 5 of the limitation act liberally. but even while liberally exercising the discretion, the court is burdened with the obligation to test the bona- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2016 (HC)

T. Krishna Pandian Vs. K.S. Bharath Kumar

Court : Chennai

..... padmavathy and another vs. n.narayanan] wherein this court held that even assuming that the petitioner is entitled to claim benefits of section 53-a of the transfer of property act, the agreement should specifically and expressly state the waiver of rent. (iv) (2005) 8 supreme court cases 252 [sait nagjee purushotham and co. ltd., vs. vimalabai ..... petition nor he led any evidence to show that his need is bonafide. in the absence of such evidence, the rent controller and the first appellate authority acted contrary to law in allowing the petition of the landlord by directing the eviction of the tenants. in such circumstances, the high court was fully justified in ..... the bona fide requirement of the previous landlord who was the plaintiff under section 10(iii)(c) of the andhra pradesh buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1960 could not survive after the plaintiff had transferred his right, title and interest in the demised premises by executing a registered sale deed dated may 11, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2016 (HC)

Nashath Jinan and Others Vs. The Government of India, Rep. by its Secr ...

Court : Chennai

..... the institute. 21. in the case on hand, this court has already held that reservation for local residents in provided under section 13(m) of the jipmer act. the jipmer institution is located at puducherry and therefore, academic advisory committee, in its meeting held on 02.03.2016, took a decision to adopt the said ..... faulted with. the learned additional solicitor general would also submit that regulation 28 of jipmer regulations, 2008 is to be read down for the reason that jipmer act itself provides for reservation and therefore, the decision of the standing academic committee merely confirms and enforces the said reservation by adopting g.o.ms.no.04 dated ..... and should have also passed the higher secondary examination from the same school. 9. the learned additional solicitor general would further submit that section 13 of the jipmer act, 2008 deals with functions of jipmer and as per sub-section (m), jipmer may reserve at least twenty seats out of every seventy five seats in undergraduate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2016 (HC)

M. Rajendran Vs. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... the lease were granted in favour of respondents 7 to 22 by the impugned resolution without following any of the procedures contemplated, under the district municipalities act, and the confirmation of lease by the impugned resolution, is against the interest of thirumangalam municipality and public. the following are the factual details that ..... passed by kumbakonam municipality, on the ground that the petitioner has a remedy of statutory appeal to the government under section 36 of tamil nadu district municipalities act. he also relied upon yet another division bench judgment of this court in kanagam v. commissioner, coimbatore and others reported in (2008 (3) mlj 185 ..... has a remedy of statutory appeal to the government, as against the resolution of the municipality, under section 36 of the tamil nadu district municipalities act and that the petitioner cannot directly rush to this court. the prayer in the writ petition indicates that the resolution challenged before this court relates to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2016 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Kumbakonam, rep. by its Branch Manage ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... (v) in reshma kumari and others v. madan mohan reported in (2009) 13 scc 422, the hon'ble apex court reiterated that the compensation awarded under the act should be just and also identified the factors which should be kept in mind while determining the amount of compensation. the relevant portions of the judgment are extracted below: the ..... observations which can appropriately be applied for deciding the petitions filed under section 166 of the act: we must emphasise that the court has to strike a balance between the inflated and unreasonable demands of a victim and the equally untenable claim of the ..... (sc), the hon'ble supreme court, comprising of three hon'ble judges bench was dealing with a case arising out of a complaint filed under the consumer protection act, 1986. while enhancing the compensation awarded by the national consumer disputes redressal commission from rs.15 lakhs to rs.1 crore, the hon'ble bench made the following .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2003 (HC)

K. Venugopal (Died) and 4 ors. Vs. the Commissioner and Secy. to Govt. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC649; (2003)2MLJ121

ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. The second appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law:(a) Whether the lower appellate Court is correct in applying the observation made by the Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 4725/95 which is relating to the grant of interim order for the continuance of service of an employee in a matter wherein an individual has approached for the alteration of date of birth on the verge of his retirement?(b) Whether the lower appellate Court is correct in holding that the appellant cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the civil Court and he is bound to convince the third respondent only in deciding his community status in spite of the fact that the revenue authorities have failed to consider various documentary evidence adduced on an earlier occasion?(c) Whether the lower appellate Court is correct in summarily rejecting all the documentary evidence by observing that they are related to different persons, even though, number of documents ac...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 1951 (HC)

Madura Labour Union and Anr. Vs. Madura Mills Workers' Co-operative St ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1954)ILLJ457Mad

..... , giving a detailed account of what, according to the petitioners, took place. in answer to this, counter-affidavits have been filed not only by the present acting secretary of the madura mills workers' co-operative stores, ltd., but also by the deputy registrar of co-operative societies, madura, who appointed a special officer ..... the proceedings. the registrar, by his letter, dated 29 march 1951, suggested the filing of a dispute under section 51 of the madras co-operative societies act before the additional joint registrar, madras, questioning the validity of the proceedings of the general body. this was not agreed to by the madura labour union and ..... the functioning of the co-operative stores became somewhat difficult and therefore the registrar of go-operative societies, madras, took action under section 43 of the act, superseded the board of directors and appointed a special officer for a period of six months which appointment terminated on 26 december 1950. the special officer convened .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //