Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 156 provisions as to existing as to existing sashastra seema bal Sorted by: old Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Page 1 of about 3 results (0.058 seconds)

Powergrid Corporation of India Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL778

..... the appellant for restoration of depleted equity for fixation of tariff for the transmission of electricity was rejected.2. the appellant is a company registered under the companies act, 1956 and is wholly owned by government of india. the appellant is established, inter alia, to own acquire, establish, operate and maintain transmission system to evacuate ..... nlc and neepco w.e.f. 1^st april, 1992 on book value. prior to setting-up of the cerc under the electricity regulatory commission act, 1998 (hereinafter called erc act 1998), the tariff for the various transmission systems owned by the appellant was being fixed by the ministry of power (hereinafter called mop) government of india ..... the financial year, but will ensure a profit being earned. in this regard, the supreme court held as under: section 59 of the electricity (supply) act says that the tariff fixation has to be so made as to raise sufficient revenue which will not merely avoid any net loss being incurred during the financial .....

Dpsc Vs. West Bengal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL860

..... .6. the tariff order was passed on 3rd june, 2004. the appellant submitted review application in time before the regulatory commission in terms of section 94(1)(f) of the act. the review petition was entertained and was disposed of on 22nd august, 2005. the tariff order was passed on 3rd june, 2004 for the financial year 2003-04 and 2004 ..... august, 2005 passed in case no.tp(r)9/ 2004-05 in the tariff application of dpsc ltd. passed under section 62(1) read with section 185 of the electricity act, 2003 for the years 2003-04 and 2004-05. (i) disallowance of depreciation charge on new 10 mw dg set at chinakuri (new) power station; (ii) fixation of coal consumer .....

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... f.11(118)/2001-power/ - in exercise of the powers conferred by section 12 and other applicable provisions of the delhi electricity reform act, 2000 (delhi act no. 2 of 2001) and pursuant to the decision made by the government of national capital territory of delhi on the restructuring of delhi ..... the commission in issuing directions to create regulatory asset, while approving annual revenue requirement and determining the tariff? (b) whether the regulatory commission has acted illegally in directing the discoms to create regulatory asset while approving annual revenue requirement and determining tariff? (c) whether the appellant in each of ..... delhi has been violated by the commission in issuing directions to create regulatory asset, while determining the tariff? (ii) whether the regulatory commission has acted illegally in directing the discoms to create regulatory asset while determining tariff? (iii) whether the appellants themselves came forward and submitted proposal to create " .....

Transmission Corporation of A.P. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL682

..... it may be pointed out that recognising the fact that over a period of time, the performance of state electricity boards [created under electricity (supply) act, 1948] having deteriorated, measures conducive to sectoral development; promoting competition; protecting consumer's interest, etc. were taken by the legislatures which entailed structural ..... ,--------based on optimal utilization of resources such as coal, ------ and renewable sources of energy". also as per section 61(h) of the electricity act, 2003 the appropriate commission is obliged to frame tariff regulation specifying the terms and conditions taking "the promotion of co-generation and generation of electricity ..... amendments would help sustain the operational stability of such projects and are in conformity with section 86(1)(e) and 61(h) of electricity act, 2003. aptransco/discoms being wholly owned entities of government of andhra pradesh, have special obligations towards ensuring the promotions of efficient and environmentally .....

Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. Vs. the Delhi Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL1319

..... surplus has to be generated for this purpose. either the character of electricity board as a public utility undertaking or the provisions of the electricity (supply) act will preclude the board from managing its affairs on sound commercial line though not with a profit-thirst. the principles of efficiency and economy are, therefore, ..... in value of property through wear, deterioration or obsolescence.depreciation is allowable as a deduction both according to accountancy principles and according to the indian income tax act. depreciation represents the diminution in value, of a capital assets, when applied to the purpose of making profit or gain.19. it is settled law that ..... provide for depreciation in its books of accounts as per the norms prescribed in terms of section 205 (1) read with section 350 of the companies act and central government notification (mop); (ii) the ministry of power in its notification specified the depreciation rate for the different categories of accessories and has .....

Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. and ors.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL405

..... govt. of maharashtra in due course." merc constituted and therefore tariff had to be determined by merc under section 22(1) of the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998 ("erc act, 1998").the committee made its report. [note: bses' representative did not sign the report] the gom passed the following order:" 1. the assumptions that ..... four weeks from today. the bank guarantees will be kept in force till passing of appropriate order by the appellate tribunal, and thereafter the parties shall act in accordance with the order that the appellate tribunal may pass. accordingly, these appeals are disposed of.53. as directed, this appeal has been preferred bytpc ..... that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law the tariff for supply of electricity, wholesale, bulk or retail shall be subject to the provisions of the act and shall be determined by the state commission. this clearly ousts the jurisdiction of any other authority to determine the tariff.74. the learned senior counsel .....

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Grid Corporation of Orissa

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL267

..... and ancillary powers to issue directions to the appellant herein as contended by respondents? 15. all three points could be considered together. the orissa electricity reform act, 1995, is a legislation of the orissa state legislature enacted to provide for restructuring of the electricity industry, for the rationalization of the generation, transmission, ..... area of license.suffice to state that each one of the three discoms is independently licensed to distribute power as an independent company registered under the companies act, 1956.22. there is no dispute that the three discoms are separate and independent legal entities distinct from the appellant rel, which is also an ..... a 51 per cent share holder in three discoms, gridco being the other major share holder.27. appellant being separate legal entity established under the companies act, 1956 and being distinct from discoms in every respect it is obviously clear that oerc has no jurisdiction to issue directions against the appellant.28. .....

Poddar Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. Uttaranchal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL86

..... except bpl and marginally higher than the effective tariff for agricultural consumers. such an arrangement would defy the rationality. learned counsel submitted that section 61 of the act requires gradual elimination of cross-subsidy and that there are no grounds in law to free the piius from the burden of cross-subsidy as yet. further, ..... consumers will perennially result in higher tariff for the category and, therefore, cannot be justified. at the same time it is also not the intent of the act of inflict tariff shock to the consumers.in view of the above twin conflicting requirements, better approach would be to determine tariff for piu category using average ..... , tariff shock to the extent of rs. 1.27 per unit would have been caused to the remaining consumers including domestic rural consumers. but neither the electricity act, 2003 nor the commission's own regulations notified on 15^th june, 2004 support such an action of the respondent commission. we therefore, direct the commission to .....

Global Energy Limited Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL1350

..... ltd., a sister concern of the appellant, before board for industrial and financial reconstruction (bifr) in a petition under the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1986 for re-habilitation and resuscitation of belgundi cements ltd. and the appeal paper book filed before the appellate authority for industrial and financial reconstruction (aaifr ..... provisions. the learned senior counsel also highlighted the fact that labour enforcement officer (central) had even filed a complaint under section 22a of the minimum wages act, 1948 against the gea energy system (india) ltd. for violation of the provisions of the minimum wages (central) rules, 1950. the upshot of his ..... has ascertained that there is no objection to the grant of the licence on the part of the central government. 3. a person intending to act as a transmission licensee shall, immediately on making the application, forward a copy of such application to the central transmission utility or the state transmission .....

Vemagiri Power Generation Vs. Transmission Corporation of A.P.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... that even though section 11 starts with a non-obstante clause which provides that the functions are to be exercised "notwithstanding anything contained in the indian telegraph act, 1885" the section nowhere provides that the functions are to be exercised notwithstanding "any contract or any decrees or orders of courts." it is well ..... is placed on the word 'regulate', it will hamper and arrest the growth of the electricity sector. in that event the whole object of the electricity act, 2003 will be defeated, which, inter alia, mandates taking of measures conductive to the development of electricity sector. the said provision cannot be construed to ..... counsel for the appellant, it will be useful to set out the aforesaid relevant provisions for answer to the question: (1) subject to the provisions of this act, the commission shall be responsible to discharge amongst others, the following functions namely: (i) to regulate the assets, properties and interest in properties concerning or .....