Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 152 effect of suspension and remission of sentence on dismissal Sorted by: old Court: mumbai

Mar 21 1906 (PC)

Chaudhri Mehdi Hasan Vs. Muhammad Hasan

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1906)8BOMLR387

..... bearing upon this case, as section 129 of the act provides that nothing contained in that chapter should be deemed to affect any rule of muhammadan law.17. it now becomes important to consider whether the possession of the property ..... it upon the donee, must also be proved. see ranee khujooroomssa v. mussamut roushun jehan .16. reference was also made by the defendant's counsel to the transfer of property act, 1882, chap. vii. as to gifts, and to certain cases decided under it which show that by the hindu law delivery of possession is not essential. but they have no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 1909 (PC)

Moosa Adam Patel Vs. Ismail Moosa

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1910)12BOMLR169

..... ' meaning, though it is possible that this was also treated as part of the proof supporting the conclusion that the alleged gift was fictitious and never intended to be acted upon. speaking generally a restrictive clause in such deeds of gift is sometimes treated as inconsistent with the legal validity of the gift as a whole, and sometimes the ..... the law regards as valuable; delivery of possession was therefore not necessary. the rest of the judgment deals with the application of section 53 of the transfer of property act. though their lordships do not say so, and seemingly were not reminded of the gift for consideration recognised by the mahomedan law, they appear to have held that was ..... and effective way, or certainly may be, of evading the law of succession. and when courts find that in fact so called gifts of this kind have not been acted upon till the death of the donor, they would, i apprehend, incline very strongly to hold that the gift was merely a cloke, and that, if effect were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 1915 (PC)

Bal Gangadhar Tilak Vs. Shri Shriniwas Pandit

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1915)17BOMLR527

..... a young widow, taj maharaj.6. at the date of his death he made a will appointing five gentlemen as his trustees. one of these, ranh sahib, declined to act; the other four obtained probate of the will on 2nd december 1897. these were messrs. tilak, khaparde and kumbhojkar, the appellants. the fourth, mr. nagpurkar, while remaining ..... is our unanimous opinion that one should not be taken from any other family. and shri tai maharaj is of the same opinion.shri tai maharaj suggests that messrs. bal gangadhar tilak and ganesh shrikrishna khaparde should both go to babre, select boys, and return after settling as regards that family.shri tai maharaj should go, see boys ..... , that on the 27th there was selection and verbal gift, and acceptance, and preparation of necessary documents. on the 28th there was execution of documents under corporea acts of giving and taking.20. in their lordships' view these conclusions are well justified.21. it is an admitted fact in the case that neither the trustees nor .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 1932 (PC)

Syed Mohammad Raza Vs. Abbas Bandi Bibi

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)116; (1932)34BOMLR1048

..... agreement the defendant refuses to marry the plaintiff by way of nikah, then the plaintiff shall in accordance with this document remain owner of a moiety, and if the plaintiff acts contrary to the stipulation of nikah, she shall cease to have any rights whatever. if, god forbid, contrary to custom the divorce of either of the wives takes place, ..... estate of shadipur shall be in the hands of their husband, syed afzal hasan, in his capacity of a husband ; if on the part of the husband there is any act of neglect) or estrangement towards either of the wives, then, in that case, the wife's only remedy will be to have the management of her share performed by ..... this connection that family arrangements are specially favoured in courts of equity.16. but apart from this, it seems clear that after the passing of the transfer of property act in 1882, a partial restriction upon the power of disposition would not, in the case of a transfer inter vivo8, be regarded as repugnant; see section 10 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1937 (PC)

Mahabir Prasad Vs. Syed Mustafa Husain

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1937)39BOMLR990

..... with the result that it was good so far as regards the children who were of age and wholly void under the indian contract act (section 11) as regards the four who were minors.14. upon a question whether an oral statement amounted to a will the greatest ..... discarded. the approach of death made it necessary for mir fida husain to do something and yet impossible to complete anything by his own act. in this dilemma what did he do?12. their lordships cannot agree with the chief court that what he is proved to have ..... impose a legal obligation so to do.11. mir fida husain was a practising lawyer of rae barelli and had studied the wakf validating act (vi of 1913). the evidence is that he had intended to make a wakf-alal-aulad himself and there is some evidence that ..... benefit students of the asna ashari sect.8. a wakf-alal-aulad having thus been made of mir fida husain's property, it was acted on for two years, more or less; but on october 21, 1924, five of the sons sued the widow' and the sixth brother .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1953 (HC)

M.V. Rajwade I.A.S., Dist. Magistrate Vs. Dr. S.M. Hassan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1954CriLJ366

..... a judicial nature, on the result of which the government, under section 22, is required to pass orders one way or the other.under this act, the government acts virtually as an appellate court with power to affirm, reverse or modify the recommendations of the special commissioners. so far as the enquiry itself is concerned ..... which is likely to prejudice mankind against them, then, irrespective of whether the matter is indictable, we would expect the press and the public men to act with the greatest caution before publishing any such inflammatory statement or narration. in this context we appreciate the apologies, in some cases wholly unconditional, which have ..... to the instant case. the commission in question was obviously appointed by the state government 'for the information of its own mind', in order that it should not act, in exercise of its executive power, 'otherwise than in accordance with the dictates of justice and equity' in ordering a departmental enquiry against its officers, it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1955 (HC)

Durgaprasad Prasannakumar Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1956Bom357; (1956)58BOMLR75; 1956CriLJ704; ILR1956Bom305

..... expln. i to section 3. it will, i think, be convenient first to set out the relevant provisions. section 3 defines 'objectionable matter' and provides that:'in this act the expression 'objectionable matter' means any words, signs or visible representations which are likely to .... (v) promote feelings of enmity or hatred between different sections of the people ..... and it would be enough to quote the remarks of shah j. in the case reported in -- 'bal gangadhar tilak v. emperor', air 1916 bom 9 at page 48 (a). shah j. was dealing with the speeches delivered by bal gangadhar tilak and this is what he said:'the speeches must be read as a whole in a fair, ..... point out that the article dated 19-7-1954 fromwhich the extracts have been quoted above fallsclearly within the mischief of section 3, clause (v)tress (objectionable matter) act, 1951.16. the defence of the appellant is that the impugned writing is protected by explanation i to section 3. explanation i to section 3 says:'comments expressing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 1972 (HC)

Sujataali, Motebarali and anr. Vs. Rupchand Vishnu Dhande and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1973Bom365; (1973)75BOMLR257; ILR1973Bom1163; 1973MhLJ766

..... tribunal and the additional mamlatdar, yawal, held that because the landlady had applied under s. 31 read with s. 29 of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1948, for recovering possession of the land for bona fide personal cultivation and obtained possession after fighting the litigation up to the revenue tribunal of the half portion on ..... paid the rent. after remand possession was again ordered by the tenancy awal karkun. the deputy collector set aside that order. the revenue tribunal confirmed that order, bal j. refused to interfere with the order of the tribunal and while doing so made an observation that even though s. 31c prevented the widow from making an ..... 29 read with section 14 was not maintainable. the tribunal upheld this contention. the said decision of the tribunal was challenged in the above special civil application and bal j. held that section 32-f was attracted as the petitioner was a widow and hence the tenant could not become the purchaser and section 31-c was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1977 (HC)

Rukminibai Guru Rajdharbuwa Mahanubhava Sukenkar Vs. Nanabuwa Guru Uma ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1978)80BOMLR593

..... panth maths were private properties of shishyas.30. neither the lower court nor the learned advocates and parties were conscious of the possible application of the bombay public trust act, 1950, to the mahanubhava panth maths and properties as prima facie the definition of 'public trust' would include such math under section 2(13) as the suit ..... the caste system and follow the rituals of their own caste and carry on social contacts with their caste people and marry among them. similar views are expressed by bal krishna mahanubhava shastri. but we are not really concerned with their theology. what we have to determine are the social and political consequences of such conversions and that, ..... itself was misconceived ignoring the rules of hindu law and the provisions of the bombay public trust act, 1950, the plaintiff's suit is liable to be dismissed on the ground that she did mot set up the usage supporting her right in respect of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1979 (TRI)

Dwarkadas and Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1982)1ITD303(Mum.)

..... of total income and not necessarily enhancement of income under a particular item-gown tile works v. cit [1957] 31 itr 250. the whole scheme under the act envisages one order, that is, the order of assessment under section 143(3).23. moreover, as regards the first question whether the assessee was or was not an ..... result of subsequent orders in appeal or revision, it may be stated, has been superseded with retrospective effect by the taxation laws (continuation and validity of recovery proceedings) act, 1964. this, however, does not in any way change the legal position regarding orders by the ito as laid down herein-above.12. again, the bombay high ..... contains two clauses, the one permitting exercise of power suo motu and the other enabling the exercise of power on application by the assessee... the provisions of the act, therefore, make a clear demarcation regarding the scope and ambit of the revisional powers exercisable suo motu by the authority and on application by the assessee. the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //