Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 152 effect of suspension and remission of sentence on dismissal Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 1 results (0.178 seconds)

A. Bal Reddy Vs. Saraswathi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1994(1)ALT72; 1994(1)ALT(Cri)379; 1994CriLJ1125

..... and even a third wife. polygamy was permitted in the territories of the hyderabad state till the hindu marriage act came into force in 1956 april. there was no legal obstacle for the marriage between saraswathi and mr. bal reddy. we have to judge this case bearing this important fact in mind. 9. it is true that ..... of acceptance by the society and the various other documentary evidence, there is a presumption of marriage and came to the conclusion that saraswathi is the wife of bal reddy. the trial court elaborately discussed the evidence produced before the court. ex. p. 1 is the certificate of birth given by municipal corporation of hyderabad regarding ..... long time and the two children, who are now well educated and well-settled, were born to them. there are records to show that in several papers bal reddy signed as father of these children. considering the voluminous documentary evidence and the long cohabitation between the parties the courts rightly drew the presumption of marriage. 24 .....

Exotic Granite Exports Rep. by Its Managing Partner Sri. K. Ramachandr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(5)ALT200

..... issue government hereby direct the principal chief conservator of forests, hyderabad to process the mining leasts/ql applications for clearance under forest (conservation) act, 1980 after receiving the applications with technical observations through the mines & geology department. however, mere forwarding of any mining lease application by the ..... government hereby direct the principal chief conservator of forest, hyderabad to process the mining leases/quarry leases applications for clearance under forest (conservation) act 1980 after receiving the applications with technical observations through the mines & geology department. however, mere forwarding of any mining lease application by the ..... , these contentions are unsustainable contentions. the learned counsel in elaboration had taken this court through the different provisions of the forest conservation act and also pointed out to the relevant portions of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and also the respective counter .....

P. Buchi Reddy and Others Vs. Ananthula Sudhakar

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD327; 1999(2)ALT192

..... person in possession, though without title, can resist interference from another who has no better title than himself and get injunction. section 38 of the specific relief act, 1963 deals with the grant of perpetual injunction. under sub-section (3) of section 38 a perpetual injunction may be granted to the plaintiff when the defendant ..... bai by dw2 towards pasupakumkum is legal, valid and binding on dw2 though effected in contravention of the provisions under section 123 of the transfer of property act? 7. the plaintiffs filed the suit for bare injunction restraining the defendant and his men from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property ..... in this matter are as under:(i) whether the plaintiffs' suit for permanent injunction without seeking declaration of title is maintainable under law? (ii) whether the acts and deeds of damodara rao (dw2) made the plaintiffs to believe that rukmini bai is the ostensible owner of the suit property and thus made them to .....

The United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Wara Vs. Myadada Latha and 7 Other ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... (5th cited) division bench of hon'ble kerala high court has considered several decisions and finally concluded that in a claim under section 163-a of the act, negligence is absolutely irrelevant. it has further observed that as negligence is irrelevant, consequently, contributory negligence is also irrelevant. the above decisions make it crystal clear ..... company ltd( 7th cited) a division bench of this court observed that the general rule of proving rash and negligent driving to claim compensation under motor vehicle act was diluted by introduction of section 163-a. in shahazadi bee v. managing director, apsrtc (6th cited) also a division bench of this court observed ..... accident and having given such finding, the tribunal is not justified in holding that the claimants are not required either to plead or establish the wrongful act or negligence and accordingly fastened liability on third respondent-insurance company. he has argued that where the third respondent is not liable to indemnify the .....

Dr. Gangaraju Sowmini and Another Vs. Alavala Sudhakar Reddy and Anoth ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... bodily injury to persons arising out of the use of motor vehicles, include claims for compensation under section 140 and section 163a. section 166 of the act provides for making an application for award of compensation arising out of an accident of the nature specified under section 165(1). the provision under section 166 ..... may, keeping in view the cost of living by notification in the official gaette, from time to time amend the second schedule. ? chapter xii of the act deals with claims tribunals and section 165 obligates the state government to establish motor accidents claims tribunals for adjudicating upon claims for compensation in respect of accidents involving ..... whether non-dependant heir of the deceased who died in a motor accident is entitled to lay claim for compensation under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 where there is no other dependant legal heir claiming compensation ? in view of the general importance of the question referred, this court has requested learned .....

M/S.Truwood Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Vs. the Commissioner of Central ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... order passed by the commissioner of central excise, visakhapatnam which was passed after filing of an application before the settlement commission under section 32e of the central excise act and was declared as "non est" by the settlement commission is valid in law. (b) whether the decision of the tribunal in holding that the ..... or any court: provided also that no application under this sub- section shall be made for the interpretation of the classification of excisable goods under the central excise tariff act, 1985 (5 of 1986)" section 32f states as follows: "section 32f: procedure on receipt of an application under section 32e. -- (1) on receipt of an ..... addition to the powers conferred on the settlement commission under this chapter, it shall have all the powers which are vested in a central excise officer under this act or the rules made thereunder. (2) where an application made under section 32e has been allowed to be proceeded with under section 32f, the settlement commission shall .....

Y. Prabhakar Rao and Others Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Chenna ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD176; 2000(4)ALT17; [2000(86)FLR743]; (2001)ILLJ478AP

..... it is stated in the counter-affidavit that the writ petition is not maintainable since the petilioncrs have chosen the remedy provided under the industrial dispute act by raising an industrial dispute. it is further slated that in view of the dispute raised by the union representing the workers including the petitioners ..... categories. the government of india accordingly issued notification, in exercise of the powers under section 10(1) of the act, prohibiting the employment of the contract labour in various works in the establishments of the respondents, which are extracted hereunder:'schedule 1. fire fighting (fire supervisor ..... of india referred the matter to the central advisory contract labour board constituted under section 3 of the contract labour (regulation and abolition) act, 1970, (hereinafter called 'the act'), and the said board in its meeting held at new delhi on 3-11-1993 recommended for abolition of contract labour in 13 different .....

C. Ramya Bala Vs. Ch. Jayaram and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... different court, the necessity to pronounce upon ex.a2 would arise once again and the adjudication and the findings recorded in an o.p. filed under section 372 of the act cannot be treated as final, much less binding on such proceedings. hence, we allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the trial court. it is however ..... to the adjudication of the claims in respect of movable properties on the one hand and immovable properties on the other. sections 370 and 372 of part-x of the act provide for grant of succession certificate in respect of movable properties, which are enlisted in sub-section (2) of section 370. the mechanism provided for under part-x ..... question that arises before us is as to whether it was competent for the court to pronounce upon the legality or proof of will, dated 21-11-2005 the act provides for adjudication of the disputes of various kinds pertaining to the claims based upon testate and intestate succession. the facility of execution of a will is created not .....

Depot Manager, Apsrtc, Chirala Vs. Kanuri Venkateswarlu and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD89; 2000(3)ALT506; (2000)IILLJ566AP

..... if the hon'ble court pleases to order'.2. the minimum wages authority by an elaborate order dated 29-5-1999 relying on section 25 of the minimum wages act. 1948 (the act, for brevity) directed the rtc to pay the difference of minimum wages of rs.1,307/- with five times penalty of rs.6,535/-. aggrieved by the said order .....

B.Shasidhar Vs. Bharat Dynamics Limited and Another.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... notice was issued and no charges whatever were framed, much less any disciplinary enquiry was conducted. when such procedure is mandatory even where an employee has committed acts of serious misconduct or dereliction of duties, omission to follow such procedure on an allegation for which no role can be ascribed to the petitioner, cannot be ..... holding that very post on the basis of selection; till he resigned. his further contention is that failure to conduct the selection cannot be said to be any act of misconduct on his part, leading to termination. he stated that he is prepared to undergo selection even, at this stage. the respondents filed a counter- ..... petitioner as technical assistant afresh. the petitioner joined the duty on 07.12.2004. a charge sheet, dated 22.02.2007, was served upon the petitioner alleging acts of misconduct and misrepresentation on his part. this was followed by a show cause notice, dated 26.08.2008, proposing the punishment of termination from service. the .....