Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 145 orders pending suspension of sentence Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 530 results (0.079 seconds)

Oct 01 2024 (HC)

Kamanna @ Kama Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... two appeals. it is necessary to observe that, such principles have evolved over the years and crystallized into settled principles of law , these are: i) section 134 of indian evidence act, 1872, enshrines the well-recognized maxim that evidence has to be weighed and not counted. in other words, it is the quality of evidence that matters and not the quantity ..... no.200113 of 2017 para 43 of the judgment it is observed by the allahabad high court that it is settled that, the testimony of single eye witness can be acted upon if otherwise reliable and corroboration required only when his evidence is open to doubt and suspicious. a close relative, who is a natural witness, cannot be recorded as an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2024 (HC)

Somling @ Some Vs. The State Through

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... two appeals. it is necessary to observe that, such principles have evolved over the years and crystallized into settled principles of law , these are: i) section 134 of indian evidence act, 1872, enshrines the well-recognized maxim that evidence has to be weighed and not counted. in other words, it is the quality of evidence that matters and not the quantity ..... no.200113 of 2017 para 43 of the judgment it is observed by the allahabad high court that it is settled that, the testimony of single eye witness can be acted upon if otherwise reliable and corroboration required only when his evidence is open to doubt and suspicious. a close relative, who is a natural witness, cannot be recorded as an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

U B Shetty Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... section 96 of the cpc, which deals with appeals from decrees. parties often raise 47 multiple grounds that are not legally permissible under the arbitration act, leading to unnecessary litigation and inefficiency. this practice contradicts the legislative intent behind arbitration, which aims for finality and efficiency in dispute resolution.47. ..... resolution, has now become an integral part of the indian legal system. the comprehensive statute dealing with arbitrations, that is, the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, is a complete code in itself and is in tune with the international standards set out in model law on international commercial arbitration adopted ..... judge (commercial court) at bengaluru, dismissing each of the said arbitration suits filed by the appellant/contractor, under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.2. the brief facts of the cases necessary for adjudication, are as under: the appellant / contractor was a successful bidder for 14 projects .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Smt. G K Akshata Vs. V Raghavendra

Court : Karnataka

..... invoking section 319 crpc, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against dakshin beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the act.26. no doubt section 142 authorises the court to condone the delay in appropriate cases. we find no reason to condone the delay. the justification ..... . hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed ..... through its branch manager, was served solely to simaiya hariramani, the authorised signatory of the firm. the complaint dated 07th december 2015 under section 138 of the ni act before the court of judicial magistrate, balodabazar, chhattisgarh, was made against simaiya hariramani and the appellant. thus, in the present case, the firm has not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Smt K R Aruna Prasad Vs. Sri V Raghavendra

Court : Karnataka

..... invoking section 319 crpc, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against dakshin beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the act.26. no doubt section 142 authorises the court to condone the delay in appropriate cases. we find no reason to condone the delay. the justification ..... . hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed ..... through its branch manager, was served solely to simaiya hariramani, the authorised signatory of the firm. the complaint dated 07th december 2015 under section 138 of the ni act before the court of judicial magistrate, balodabazar, chhattisgarh, was made against simaiya hariramani and the appellant. thus, in the present case, the firm has not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2024 (HC)

Meghana Kuruvalli Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... solicitor general. it was then submitted that the rights of the oci cardholders cannot be claimed beyond the notification issued under section 7b of the citizenship act. he submitted that therefore, the rationale lies in not grouping the oci cardholder with indian citizen for applying 371j reservation. 4.5 learned additional ..... undisputedly stated. the petitioner stayed upto 4th december 2018 in the foreign country- britain. he submitted that by virtue of section 9 of the citizenship act, which contemplate the circumstances leading to termination of citizenship, the petitioner s citizenship of india ceased. it was the next submission that the petitioner as ..... being enjoyed by the petitioners. though the notification was sustained as having been backed by competent sovereign power - 28 - under the statute of citizenship act, it was held that it is sustainable prospectively only. it was ruled that the portion of the notification which provide for suppression of the earlier notifications .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

M/s Samrudhi Groups Hubli Vs. Sri Anand S/o Holebasappa Angadi

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... court ought not to have impounded the documents, cannot be accepted. the very contention that, without there being any determination about the provisions of the stamp act, which is applicable to the said documents sought to be impounded also cannot be accepted. the trial court while passing the order elaborately discussed the same and ..... lj92 wherein discussion was made in sections 33(1) - 16 - nc:2024. khc-d:11334 wp no.102296 of 2022 and 37(2) of the stamp act. the documents said to be insufficiently stamped not produced in evidence, but produced subsequent to settlement of issues, at the time of filing interlocutory application for temporary injunction ..... considering the question involved in the matter and determining the point for consideration, it is appropriate to extract sections 33, 34 and 37 of the karnataka stamp act, for consideration:33. examination and impounding of instruments.- (1) every person having by law or consent of parties authority to receive evidence, and every person .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2024 (HC)

Uppinangady Co Operative Agricultural Society Limited Vs. The State Of ...

Court : Karnataka

..... s/o late narayana udupa, aged about61years, pilathabettu village, bantwala taluk, post:punjalakatte-574233, d.k. district, (reg. under karnataka co-operative society act, 1959) senior citizen benefit not claimed. ...petitioner (by sri a. keshava bhat, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, represented by its secretary ..... keshava gowda karmaje, s/o krishnappa gowda, aged about60years, chokkady, sullia taluk, post: kukkujadka-574212, dk district, reg. under karnataka co-op. society act, 1959, (senior citizen benefit not claimed) ...petitioner (by sri a. keshava bhat, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, represented by its secretary ..... president ramakrishna rai s/o manjunatha rai, aged about54years, yedamangala , kadaba taluk, post: yedamangala - 574221, d k district, reg. under karnataka co-operative society act. ...petitioner (by sri a. keshava bhat, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, represented by its secretary, department of parliamentary affairs and legislation, vidhana .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2024 (HC)

Kawal Jeet Kaur Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... further clarification. but, there is no clarification in respect of the release of the vehicle for interim custody.12. section 60(3) and section 63 of the ndps act read as under: section 60(3): any animal or conveyance used in carrying any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance 2[or controlled substances]., or any article liable to ..... having heard both the counsel and perused the records, the following points would arise for consideration: i) whether the sessions judge being the special court under the ndps act, is empowered to release the vehicle in view of the judgment of the division bench of this court in crl.rp.no.623/2020?. ii) whether there is ..... the petitioner contended that the dcc is not releasing the vehicle, which has nothing to do with the offence committed by the driver of the vehicle under the ndps act. the vehicle in question was hired by some private party for transporting their goods. the accused/driver committed an offence by transporting the drugs, without the knowledge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2024 (HC)

Sri. Sayan Mukherjee Vs. Smt. Nabamita Mukherjee

Court : Karnataka

..... the petitioner, sri adit chandan-goudar, learned counsel for respondent and sri gowtham raghunath, advocate appointed - 7 - nc:2024. khc:29888 wp no.13848 of 2024 by this court to act as mediator. these kind of efforts from the advocates will mitigate the suffering of the parties as well as the little ones who have to undergo the legal proceedings. the ..... .2. thereafter by order impugned the court had dismissed the i.a filed by the husband seeking injunction and the court has observed that there is no provision under the act to pass such an order. then as far as i.a.no.3 is concerned, father was granted visitation on every sunday from 8.00 am. to 10.00 p .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //