Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 142 pardon and remission Page 5 of about 2,081 results (0.494 seconds)

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Ram Byas Rai vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... commandant and below in the itbp was enhanced from 55 to 57 years. it is pointed out that even in the other capfs like the bsf, crpf, shasastra seema bal (ssb) the age of superannuation up to the rank of commandant is 57 years. it is pointed out that even the bsf and ssb, which were initially governed ..... legislation. 36.5 explaining the decision in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed under ..... ) (ac) (transport) in terms of the itbp force, deputy commandant (transport) and assistant commandant (transport) recruitment rules, 2002 made under section 156 (2) of the itbp act. 4.5 on 21st october, 2006 dev sharma was promoted to the post of deputy commandant (transport) (dc) in terms of the 2002 rules. there was an upgradation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Nandan Singh Bisht vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... commandant and below in the itbp was enhanced from 55 to 57 years. it is pointed out that even in the other capfs like the bsf, crpf, shasastra seema bal (ssb) the age of superannuation up to the rank of commandant is 57 years. it is pointed out that even the bsf and ssb, which were initially governed ..... legislation. 36.5 explaining the decision in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed under ..... ) (ac) (transport) in terms of the itbp force, deputy commandant (transport) and assistant commandant (transport) recruitment rules, 2002 made under section 156 (2) of the itbp act. 4.5 on 21st october, 2006 dev sharma was promoted to the post of deputy commandant (transport) (dc) in terms of the 2002 rules. there was an upgradation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Jai Bhagwan vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... commandant and below in the itbp was enhanced from 55 to 57 years. it is pointed out that even in the other capfs like the bsf, crpf, shasastra seema bal (ssb) the age of superannuation up to the rank of commandant is 57 years. it is pointed out that even the bsf and ssb, which were initially governed ..... legislation. 36.5 explaining the decision in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed under ..... ) (ac) (transport) in terms of the itbp force, deputy commandant (transport) and assistant commandant (transport) recruitment rules, 2002 made under section 156 (2) of the itbp act. 4.5 on 21st october, 2006 dev sharma was promoted to the post of deputy commandant (transport) (dc) in terms of the 2002 rules. there was an upgradation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

N. Ramakutty vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... commandant and below in the itbp was enhanced from 55 to 57 years. it is pointed out that even in the other capfs like the bsf, crpf, shasastra seema bal (ssb) the age of superannuation up to the rank of commandant is 57 years. it is pointed out that even the bsf and ssb, which were initially governed ..... legislation. 36.5 explaining the decision in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed under ..... ) (ac) (transport) in terms of the itbp force, deputy commandant (transport) and assistant commandant (transport) recruitment rules, 2002 made under section 156 (2) of the itbp act. 4.5 on 21st october, 2006 dev sharma was promoted to the post of deputy commandant (transport) (dc) in terms of the 2002 rules. there was an upgradation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Tilak Ram vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... commandant and below in the itbp was enhanced from 55 to 57 years. it is pointed out that even in the other capfs like the bsf, crpf, shasastra seema bal (ssb) the age of superannuation up to the rank of commandant is 57 years. it is pointed out that even the bsf and ssb, which were initially governed ..... legislation. 36.5 explaining the decision in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed under ..... ) (ac) (transport) in terms of the itbp force, deputy commandant (transport) and assistant commandant (transport) recruitment rules, 2002 made under section 156 (2) of the itbp act. 4.5 on 21st october, 2006 dev sharma was promoted to the post of deputy commandant (transport) (dc) in terms of the 2002 rules. there was an upgradation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

B L Naik vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... commandant and below in the itbp was enhanced from 55 to 57 years. it is pointed out that even in the other capfs like the bsf, crpf, shasastra seema bal (ssb) the age of superannuation up to the rank of commandant is 57 years. it is pointed out that even the bsf and ssb, which were initially governed ..... legislation. 36.5 explaining the decision in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed under ..... ) (ac) (transport) in terms of the itbp force, deputy commandant (transport) and assistant commandant (transport) recruitment rules, 2002 made under section 156 (2) of the itbp act. 4.5 on 21st october, 2006 dev sharma was promoted to the post of deputy commandant (transport) (dc) in terms of the 2002 rules. there was an upgradation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2010 (HC)

P. Paliwal and ors. Vs. Hindustan Zinc Limited and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

..... not regulatory in nature. for vesting of undertaking in hzl, the undertaking of the mci was taken over by the government of india by the act of 1965, act of 1966 and act of 1976 and then undertaking was transferred to hzl. in jialal kapur's case, the division bench of this court was influenced by the ..... the respondent is that the respondent-company is engaged in commercial activity. the commercial activity itself is not a decisive factor nor body's registration under the companies act itself is decisive. the decisive criteria as already referred and discussed above, clearly proves the respondent to be 'other authority' within the meaning of article 12 ..... its functions and activities. the respondent-company raised preliminary objection that the respondent-hindustan zinc limited (for short 'hzl') is merely a company registered under the companies act, 1956 and it is not state within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution of india and, therefore, no writ lies against it. in support of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (HC)

Nusli Neville Wadia Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR345; 2006(3)MhLj713

..... against the eviction proceedings have been received by the ministry for issuance of guidelines so that the provisions of public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971 are not indiscriminately used by public statutory organisations to oust the genuine tenants. the said letter also mentions that it has been decided ..... to these guidelines, and withdraw eviction proceedings against genuine tenants on grounds otherwise than as provided under these guidelines. the provisions under the pp (e) act, 1971 should be used henceforth only in accordance with these guidelines. 8. mr. dada, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner has contended that ..... senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has brought to our notice that the respondent no. 1 is a company formed under the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972 and he pointed out section 23 therein, which reads as under:--power of central government to issue directions:-- the corporation and every acquiring company .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2005 (HC)

Sarmus Sab Vs. IsmaIn Sab (Deceased by L.Rs.) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2006Kant107

..... circumstances to determine what was intended.2) if a transaction embodied in the document takes place after the amendment to section 58(c) of the transfer of property act by act 20 of 1929, and if the sale and agreement to re-purchase are embodied in separate documents that the transaction is not a mortgage.i) if the transaction ..... holding that plaintiff being the brother of kasimsab has interest in getting the property redeemed in view of the provisions of section 91(a) of the transfer of property act. both the courts below have held concurrently on the question of fact that the first defendant has failed to prove that kasimsab has left behind the wife rabia bi ..... as the document is a usufructuary mortgage condition imposed therein which is clog on redemption is void in view of the provisions of section 60 of the transfer of property act. being aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, the first defendant preferred ra. no. 48/99 on the file of addl. civil judge (sr. dn.) bellary, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2022 (HC)

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Sri. Ganesh Devadiga

Court : Karnataka

..... /package policy covers the liability, there cannot be any dispute in that regard. we may hasten to clarify that the earlier pronouncements were rendered in respect of the act policy which admittedly cannot cover a third party risk of an occupant in a car. but, if the policy is a comprehensive/package policy , the liability would be ..... that a comprehensive/package policy would cover the liability of the insurer for payment of compensation for the occupant in a car. there is no cavil that an act policy stands on a different footing from a comprehensive/package policy . as the circulars have made the position very clear and the irda, which is presently the statutory ..... dispute occurrence of accident and injuries suffered by the claimant as a pillion rider and his only grievance is that even though offending scooter was covered with an act policy and no additional premium was paid to cover the risk of pillion rider, learned tribunal merely on account of the fact that there was policy coverage for .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //