Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 140 recovery of fine Court: karnataka Page 2 of about 835 results (0.100 seconds)

M/s Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Ashok Rao S/o Late Nanjunda Rao

Court : Karnataka

..... therefore, the married sister neither depending on the deceased nor entitled to represent the estate of the deceased. therefore, granted compensation only under section-140 of the mv act, due to difference of factual matrix involved in the above stated case and in the present case, the same is not applicable in the present case, so ..... sister is by virtue as a legal representatives . hence, can maintain claim petition but awarded compensation under no fault liability theory as per section-140 of the mv act. therefore, the term legal representative has wider meaning compared to legal heir. therefore, the claim petition filed by the mother of the deceased as claimant no.2 ..... . legal heirs can be both legal heirs and legal representatives , but legal representatives may not be in all cases legal heirs . but under section-166 of mv act, the words used is legal representative can maintain claim petition.12. the hon ble apex court in the case of manjuri bera s referred to supra, while referring .....

Smt Siddagangamma Vs. Smt Ramakka

Court : Karnataka

..... deceased, the relatives of the deceased having special knowledge of the relationship are competent witness and their evidence is admissible within the meaning of section 50 of the evidence act.19. in the case of jagadish prasad vs. sarwan kumar reported in air2003p & h10it is held that where a person is in common relation of the parties ..... this statement along with the attendant circumstances placed on record would certainly constitute proving of the will by other evidence as permitted by section 71 of the evidence act.13. the learned counsel submits that even though the dna test report is in favour of the plaintiff respondent, but the benefit of dna test report has ..... of malabati and also at the time of the upanyan ceremonies of plaintiffs 1 and 2. this evidence, in our opinion, properly comes within s.50, evidence act; it shows the opinion of janardan misra as expressed by his conduct, namely, his attending the marriage of malabati as daughter of lokenath and his attending the marriages .....

Hasham Investment And Trading Company Private Limited Vs. India Awake ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 38 it is further contended that, the complainants and their associates have committed serious economic offences and violated the provisions of companies act, pmla, sebi act, rbi act and income tax act and given their clout and influence the matter needed court monitored multi disciplinary investigation. the issues in respect of the same along ..... propriety is involved and the judges, like everyone else, will have to earn respect and they cannot demand respect by- (i) punishing persons for unintended acts or technical violations; (ii) frequent summoning of government officers to court; and (iii) making avoidable adverse comments and observations against persons who are not ..... controlled by accused no.2-r.subramanian. the directors of 'india awake for transparency'-mr. rajender kumar and mrs. adiseshan srimathi are disqualified to act as directors and their appointment as additional directors was not regularized in the annual general body meeting 105 of 'india awake for transparency'. it is .....

Peerless General Finance and Investment Company Ltd. Rep. by Its Regio ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ935Kant

..... dated september 28, 1989, has rejected the appeal. respondent thereafter filed an application under section 10(4-a) read with section 2 of the industrial disputes act, 1947 ('the act' for short), on the file of the additional industrial tribunal, bangalore. the application was contested by the appellant. based on the pleadings, the labour court ..... manager at bangalore, he traced out some commission vouchers which had been forged. the commission vouchers contained his signatures and that of one sri adinarayanan, by acts of forgery. the payments in respect of those vouchers were effected through respondent. on enquiry, respondent told him that he had effected the payments and he ..... disciplinary enquiry?(3) has the industrial tribunal committed any error or illegality in dismissing the application filed by the respondent under section 10(4-a) of the act'?8. re. point no. 1: the appellant has issued the charge sheet dated august 19, 1988 to the respondent. the charge related to the forging .....

Mr M Pitchaiah Vs. Mr K S Periyaswamy

Court : Karnataka

..... were responsible for the conduct of the business of the company. (iii) vicarious liability can be inferred against a company registered or incorporated under the companies act, 1956 only if the requisite statements, which are required to be averred in the complaint/petition, are made so as to make the accused therein vicariously ..... learned magistrate/special court (economic offences) bengaluru, after recording sworn statement of the complainant, has taken cognizance for the offence punishable under section 447 of the act of 2013 and issued summons.4. sri. k. g. raghavan, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on bare perusal of the complaint, it ..... the president of india is a major share holder holding 54.03% equity shares by investing public money. he appoints the board of directors under the companies act, articles of association and memorandum of association of beml ltd. company (for short company ). the board of directors of the company recommended 25% of the .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. sri.srinivasa

Court : Karnataka

..... states coverage in respect of drivers and conductors of public service vehicle and employees carried in a goods vehicle would be limited to the liability under the workmen's compensation act. it does not speak of any passenger in a `goods carriage'.27. furthermore, sub-clauses (i) of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section ..... policy does not cover liability to gratuitous passengers who are not carried for hire or reward. if a liability other than the limited liability provided for under the act is to be enhanced under an insurance policy, additional premium is required to be paid. the liability is restricted to the liability arising out of the statutory requirements ..... contention has been taken by the appellant-insurance company in the written statement as well as in the evidence that policy issued by the insurance company is the act policy and it does not cover the risk of the inmates of the car. the tribunal without examining ex.r1- insurance policy relying upon judgment of this court .....

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Smt Sadhika

Court : Karnataka

..... and employee between first respondent and the deceased and thereby, the petitioners are entitled to claim compensation as dependants under section 22 of the workmen's compensation act, 1923.9. as regards quantum of compensation is concerned, the commissioner considered that the deceased was earning rs.4,000/- per month and he was ..... to drive the vehicle without valid driving licence, thereby, he has violated the terms and conditions of the policy, also the provisions of the motor vehicles act, thereby, the insurance company can avoid its liability. it is further contended that the commissioner has erroneously assumed that the deceased was holding a valid ..... :1717 mfa no.9827 of 2012 the spot. the legal representatives of the deceased have approached the commissioner seeking compensation under section 22 of the workmen compensation act. the claim was opposed by the insurance company. after taking the evidence, the commissioner by the impugned judgment awarded compensation of rs.4,23,580/- with .....

M. Pitchaiah and Others Vs. K.S. Periyaswamy, Advocate

Court : Karnataka

..... were responsible for the conduct of the business of the company. (iii) vicarious liability can be inferred against a company registered or incorporated under the companies act, 1956 only if the requisite statements, which are required to be averred in the complaint/petition, are made so as to make the accused therein vicariously ..... . learned magistrate/special court (economic offences) bengaluru, after recording sworn statement of the complainant, has taken cognizance for the offence punishable under section 447 of the act of 2013 and issued summons. 4. sri. k. g. raghavan, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on bare perusal of the complaint, it ..... the president of india is a major share holder holding 54.03% equity shares by investing public money. he appoints the board of directors under the companies act, articles of association and memorandum of association of beml ltd. company (for short company') the board of directors of the company recommended 25% of the .....

Boby Mathew Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3003; 2004(5)KarLJ415

..... suppression of material evidence and hence it is contended that the alleged recoveries or discovery of fact at the instance of the accused under section 27 of the indian evidence act is unacceptable.19. commenting upon the probabilities based on the prosecution evidence, it is contended that as is apparent from the evidence both the accused and the deceased were strong ..... based upon such other material irrespective of the fact as to whether motive is established or not'.29. it is to be noted that motive for a crime is an act of mind and cannot be fathomed like any other physical evidence. basically the motive would be known only to the deceased and more specifically to the accused. the deceased is .....

Maha Ganapati Shankara Devasthana, Sirsi and Others Vs. State of Karna ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... as a religious denomination within the meaning of article 26 of constitution of india and accordingly to declare that karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments (amendment) act 2011 (karnataka act 27 of 2011) and rules 2002, can have no application to hindus and their right to establish, manage and administer their own religious charitable institutions; c) ..... considered the law laid down by the apex court with regard to the interpretation of article 25 and 26 of the constitution of india in the following decisions: (1) bal patil and another vs. union of india, air 2005 sc 3172, (2) dr. ramesh yeshwant prabhoo v. prabhakar kashinath kunte, air 1966 sc 1113, (3) ..... (5) dr. ramesh yeshwant prabhoo v. prabhakar kashinath kunte, air 1966 sc 1113, (6) pannalal bansilal vs. state of andhra pradesh, air 1996 sc 1023, (7) bal patil and another vs. union of india, air 2005 sc 3172, and (8) m.p. gopalakrishnan nair vs. state of kerala, air 2005 sc 3053. the contention of the .....