Court : Delhi
..... jurisdiction is called upon to determine the apportionment of the compensation between the petitioner on the one hand and kishan singh (respondent no.3) on the other, it cannot but act equitably. as already pointed out above, there is no difference whatsoever between the position of the petitioner and that of kishan singh insofar as the death of ishwari kaur, laxman .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within two weeks from today. in addition thereto, for ..... apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... 3.2. counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive ckg, they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in tilokchand manaklal kothari (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within two weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... therein will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... since the petitioner does not wish to revive dppl, he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the w.p.(c) 2037/2018 page 2 of 4 companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would also like to avail the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. w.p. (c) 2151/2018 page 3 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within two ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... 2. counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioner does not wish to revive mtspl and ntipl, he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in harpreet singh batra (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that he would also like to avail the benefit .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within three weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... .(c)2220/2018 page 2 of 3 5.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of three weeks from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... .4. counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive team one, they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 4.1 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... .1 & 2 take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them, in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within three weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the moment ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of three weeks from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... 4.2. counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioner does not wish to revive tptpl, he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in harpreet singh batra (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that he would also like to avail the benefit .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within 10 days from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... therein will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of 10 days from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioner does not wish to revive mtspl, ntipl and aepl, he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in harpreet singh batra (supra). w.p.(c) no.2142 of 2018 pg. 2 of 4 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within ten days from today. in addition thereto, for ..... apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of ten days from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners does not wish to revive (cspl and csspl) , they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh & anr. (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within ten days from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of ten days from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... running. 4.2 counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioner does not wish to revive vkppl he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh & anr. (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would also like to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... 31.8.1999 passed against, one, shri kapil dutt bali under section 7(1) & (3) read with section 19(1) of the smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators (forfeiture of property) act, 1976 (in short safema), the impugned order dated 1.2.2018 came to be passed w.p.(c) 2864/2018 page 1 of 3 by sub-tehsil office, mahlilpur. 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!