Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 140 recovery of fine Court: delhi Page 10 of about 565 results (0.342 seconds)

Gopendra Mohan Gupta and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2098

..... fir that she received summons from the civil court on 16th october 2007 in the application filed by the husband under section 9 of the hindu marriage act 1955 ('hma'). personal meetings were organized between the parties at the request of the learned civil judge but no settlement was arrived at on account of petitioners' attitude. ..... determined at the trial.7. the second document relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner is an affidavit dated 22nd july 2008 filed by the complainant in hma no. 613 of 2007 before the learned additional district judge ('adj'), delhi. in this affidavit the complainant termed the incident of 24th november 2006 as an unfortunate ..... by the complainant before the sdm and the affidavit dated 22nd july 2008 before the learned adj. significantly the husband, after filing an application under section 9 hma, conveniently withdrew it on 1st august 2008 after the above affidavit was filed by the complainant offering to return to the matrimonial home. so much for the .....

Northern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Heavy Engineering Corpn. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR442(Delhi); 146(2008)DLT650

..... works and services. it would be pertinent to note that under the permanent machinery of arbitration, as applicable at that time, it was specifically provided that the arbitration act, 1940 shall not be applicable. it was also provided that the award of the arbitrator shall be binding upon the parties in dispute provided, however, any party ..... at this juncture, it would be relevant to note that although the contract dated 21.09.1988 required the reference to arbitration under the provisions of the arbitration act, 1940, that clause had been superseded by virtue of the establishment of the permanent machinery of arbitration, which was set up to take care of the commercial ..... clause whereby the disputes between ncl and hec were to be referred for settlement through arbitration and the arbitration was to be conducted under the provisions of the arbitration act, 1940. 4. within 45 days of the said contract dated 21.09.1988 between ncl and hec, hec allegedly sub-contracted the entire work to rec ( .....

Rajiv Gupta Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

..... passed by the forum and has overlooked its own fault.12. on the other hand, ms. shobhna takiar, learned counsel for respondent- dda submits that respondent has acted fairly and reasonably in the present case inasmuch as the inadvertent error in allotting the flat no. 74 was rectified suo moto by dda within a period of four ..... had only directed payment of costs and not granted any other relief to the petitioner.11. ms. leena, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent- dda has acted arbitrarily in issuing the cancellation order and that too without complying with the principles of natural justice. she further submits that respondent-dda has misinterpreted the order dated 6th ..... and in a manner that the o.p. had been negligent in performance of the service so far the allotment of flat in question to the complainant. the act of o.p. in displaying the name of complainant for the flat which does not exist at site amount to deficiency of services however, vide letter dated 30 .....

Denso India Ltd Vs. Technico Industries Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... respondents: mr n.k. bhardwaj, adv. coram :hon'ble mr justice rajiv shakdher rajiv shakdher, j1 this is a petition filed under section 11 of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 (in short the act) for appointment of an arbitrator. notice in this petition was issued on 31.05.2013. since then the respondent has entered appearance and filed its reply. the petition .....

Spml Infra Limited Vs. Ntpc Limited and anr

Court : Delhi

..... omp12742013 allowed subject to just exceptions. omp no.1273/2013 and omp no.1274/2013 1. the captioned petitions have been filed under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.2. mr. nayar says that the prayers made in the captioned petitions are common, save and except the amounts referred to therein.3. broadly, the prayer sought is that .....

Spml Infra Ltd Vs. Ntpc Limited and anr

Court : Delhi

..... omp12742013 allowed subject to just exceptions. omp no.1273/2013 and omp no.1274/2013 1. the captioned petitions have been filed under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.2. mr. nayar says that the prayers made in the captioned petitions are common, save and except the amounts referred to therein.3. broadly, the prayer sought is that .....

Sunil Sikri Vs. the Management Committee of Guru Harkrishan Public

Court : Delhi

..... , is uncalled for and illegal. second, that the committee constituted pursuant to the resolution dated 21.11.2013 is not in accordance with the provisions of the delhi school education act, 1973 and the rules framed thereunder.6. mr ralli, learned counsel for the petitioner, has strenuously argued that the respondents herein despite a reply filed by the petitioner to the ..... his reply to the show cause notice on 23.09.2013.8. with regard to the second aspect referred to hereinabove, mr ralli says that section 15 of the aforesaid act makes it clear that for unaided minority schools the mechanism of a disciplinary proceeding has to be provided in the contract executed between the petitioner and the concerned school. it .....

Rajesh & Ors. Vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... crl.a. no.763/2000 page 9 of 15 death.16. to constitute an offence under section 304b ipc of dowry death, the presumption under section 113b of the evidence act cannot be raised against an accused until independently the offence under section 498a ipc is proved by leading evidence to the specific allegation with regard to time and date of .....

Burberry Limited & Anr. Vs.digaaz.com/digaaz-ecommerce Pvt. Ltd. & Ors ...

Court : Delhi

..... assessed.17. in above view, the suit is partly decreed with costs. the defendants, their companies, their directors, partners, proprietors, officers, servants, agents, associates and representatives or any other person acting for on their behalf are restrained permanently from:-"cs (os) 576/2014 page 7 of 8 (i.) using, selling, offering for sale, marketing, trading, directly or indirectly dealing in or ..... the plaint, the first plaintiff is a company established and incorporated under the laws of england, the second plaintiff being its subsidiary and a company incorporated under the indian companies act, the former marketing and selling its products in india through the latter.3. the plaint described the first defendant as a private limited company incorporated in india, engaged in the .....

Satish Kumar Bhatia vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... has been held guilty for the offence punishable under section 498a ipc; that the trial court erred in not giving the benefit of section 4 of the probation of offenders act to the appellant as even in an offence under section 304 ipc, the hon ble supreme court in 2000 i ad (criminal) sc631was pleased to give the benefit of probation .....