Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 139 communication of certain orders officers Court: supreme court of india Page 9 of about 441 results (0.196 seconds)

Haryana Power Purchase Centre Vs. Sasan Power Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... central electricity regulatory commission (2010) 4 scc603 in ptc india limited4, the actual question which arose was as to whether the appellate tribunal under the act has jurisdiction under section 111 to examine the validity of regulations framed in exercise of power 4 ptc india limited v. central electricity regulatory commission (2010 ..... initial consent in schedule 2, on behalf of the procurers, the spv was expected to issue the notification under section 6 of the land acquisition act, obtain necessarily environmental and forest clearance for the power stations, allocate captive coal mines and finally, give the water linkage for the reasonable project requirements ..... by the appellate tribunal for electricity (hereinafter referred to as tribunal for brevity) in an appeal carried by the first respondent under section 111 of the act. (2) the appeal before the tribunal, in turn, was lodged against the order passed by the central electricity regulatory commission (hereinafter referred to as .....

Gujarat Composite Limited Vs. A Infrastructure Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 587 of 2018 filed by the appellant against the order passed by the commercial court, ahmedabad dismissing the applications under section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 19961 in commercial civil suit nos. 90 of 2017 and 91 of 2017 respectively. both these appeals, involving common questions concerning arbitrability of the dispute, ..... arbitrable and nonarbitrable. we are in complete agreement with the view taken by the learned commercial court while rejecting the application under section 8 of the arbitration act, 1996. 19 5.3. accordingly, the high court proceeded to dismiss both the appeals and thereby affirmed the order passed by the commercial court in ..... of himangi enterprises v. kamaljeet singh ahluwalia: (2017) 10 scc706 to the effect that landlord-tenant disputes governed by the provisions of the transfer of property act, 1882 were not arbitrable, was doubted. while dealing with the reference, the court also dealt with the other interconnected aspects as to the meaning of .....

Rajesh Jain Vs. Ajay Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of proof and presumptions: conceptual underpinnings 29. there are two senses in which the phrase burden of proof is used in the indian evidence act, 1872 (evidence act, hereinafter). one 18 is the burden of proof arising as a matter of pleading and the other is the one which deals with the ..... can be made between discretionary presumptions ( may presume ) and compulsive or compulsory presumptions ( shall presume ). [g. vasu v. syed yaseen (supra)].33. the evidence act provides for presumptions, which fit within one of three forms: 'may presume' (rebuttable presumptions of fact), 'shall presume' (rebuttable presumption of law) and conclusive presumptions ( ..... respondent judgment aravind kumar, j.1. leave granted.2. the respondent-accused was tried for the offence under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881 (for short ni act ). the trial court acquitted1 him. the high court dismissed the appellant s- complainant's appeal and upheld the order of acquittal2. challenging the .....

Krishnadatt Awasthy Vs. State Of M.p..

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... hearing. it clearly appears from the above facts of the case that selection of the petitioners has been made contrary to the provisions of madhya pradesh panchayat raj act, 1993 and principles prescribed for the selection. in the above situation, the order dated 02.06.1999 passed by the collector, chhatarpur is not liable to ..... religious, linguistic, regional, caste or sectional diversities; or (iii) the dignity of women; or (b)gross negligence in the discharge of the duties under this act; [(c) the use of position or influence directly or indirectly to secure employment for any relative in the panchayat or any action for extending any pecuniary benefits to ..... duties under the above section and in such circumstances, if it is done, then office bearers of the panchayat could be terminated. in section 100 of the act, acquisition of any interest by any member office bearer or employee directly or indirectly in any contract or any employment made is strictly prohibited. in the present .....

Ratnu Yadav Vs. The State Of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... part of her statement recorded under section 161 of crpc. the witness ought to have been confronted with her prior statement in accordance with section 145 of the indian evidence act. however, in the cross- examination made by the public prosecutor, the witness accepted the suggestion given by the public prosecutor that the appellant came to her house at 7 p ..... his mother s hair, the appellant took her towards the pond. at that time, one lakhan came there and tried to tell the appellant that he should not do such acts with his mother. the appellant abused him and forced him to leave. it is pertinent to note that pw-2 bisoha did not support the prosecution and was declared hostile .....

Akshay Vs. Aditya

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... with the respondents complainants for the units in question.3. the respondents complainants filed the complaints before the `state commission under section 17 of the consumer protection act, 1986 against the present appellants and respondent no.2 seeking inter alia the declaration that the present appellants and the respondent no.2 were jointly and severally involved ..... by the letter of revocation dated 12-8-2014, coupled with public notice of the same date and hence the appellants could not be held liable for any act done by respondent no.2, who had allegedly entered into agreements with the complainants. he also submitted that the complaints as such are not 6 maintainable under the ..... letter of revocation dated 12-8-2014, submitted that even as per the said letter, the appellants had stated that they could not be liable for the acts of the respondent no.2 henceforth meaning thereby after the said letter, however, the respondent no.2 had entered into the agreement with the complainants i.e .....

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... | |correspondences/orders | | | |are therefore exempt | | | |from disclosure in terms| | | |of the provisions of | | | |section 8(1)(a) (d) and | | | |(e) of the rti act, | | | |2005. | |2. |complete list of banks which were | | | |issued show cause notices before | | | |fine was imposed as also referred | | | |in enclosed news clipping | | ..... | | |violations/contraventions made by scb |inspection (afi) of | | | |the bank which is | | | |conducted under the | | | |provisions of sec.35 | | | |of the br act, 1949. | | | |the findings of the | | | |inspection are | | | |confidential in | | | |nature intended | | | |specifically for the | | | |supervised entities | | ..... | | | |state. | | | |as such the | | | |information cannot be| | | |disclosed in terms of| | | |section 8(1) (a) and | | | |(e) of the rti act, | | | |2005 | |4. |please provide us the details/copies |-do- | | |of the findings recordings, enquiry | | | |reports, directive orders file notings| | | |and/or any information on .....

State of Kerala and Ors. Vs. M/S Kerala Rare Earth and Minerals Limite ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the ownership of the mines vests in the state of jharkhand in view of the declaration under the provisions of the bihar land reforms act, 1950 which act is protected by placing it in schedule ix added by the first amendment to the constitution. while speaking for the constitution bench in waman ..... organizations. 18. mineral ilmenite, rutile, leucoxene, zircon and monazite except sillimanite and garnet have been classified as prescribed substances under the atomic energy act 1962. under the central government industrial policy 1991, mining and production of minerals classified as prescribed substances was reserved for the public sector. as per ..... non scheduled mineral) by state/central public sector undertakings is not in consonance with the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (for short mmdr act 1957 ); (ii) whether state government s policy of reservation for exploitation of beach sand minerals by its public sector undertakings is untenable on .....

Idbi Trusteeship Services Ltd. Vs. Hubtown Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... .14. notwithstanding the debenture holder s/the debenture trustee s and the security trustee s/ lender s rights under any security which the debenture holder/ the trustee (acting on approved instructions) and the security trustee, jointly and severally, shall have the fullest liberty to call upon the guarantor to pay all or part of the monies ..... of 14.75% per annum ( default interest rate ) on the outstanding amount, till the same is discharged in full to the satisfaction of the debenture trustee (acting on approved instructions) or the security trustee and the guarantor agrees that the default interest rate agreed, is a genuine pre-estimate of the loss likely to be suffered ..... be taken by fmo nominees on the board of vinca. (c) the dtds for the amazia and rubix opcds provided that the debenture trustee/the petitioner would only act on the instructions of the nominee directors of fmo. v) accordingly though vinca was an indian company and the nominal recipient of the fdi, the transaction was .....

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1991SC101; (1991)1CompLJ1(SC); JT1990(3)SC725; 1991LabIC91; (1991)ILLJ395SC; 1991Supp(1)SCC600; [1990]Supp1SCR142; 1991(1)SLJ56(SC)

..... and ors. : [1964]6scr784 challenge was thrown to the constitutionality of the amendments made to sections 40, 41 and section 7 by the land acquisition amendment act (act 31 of 1962) on the ground that it contravened article 31(2) inasmuch as it makes acquisition for a company before july 20, 1962 as being for ..... a private individual, is limited in its ability to contract by the constitution. the federal contracting power is based upon the constitution's authorisation of these acts 'necessary and proper' to the carrying out of the functions which it allocates to the national government,-unless the objectives sought by terms and conditions in ..... to be harmoniously blended so as to serve the societal need consistent with the constitutional scheme.statutory construction:314. statutory construction raises a presumption that an act or a provision therein a constitutionally valid unless it appears to be ultra vires or invalid. the legislature, subject to the provisions of the constitution, has .....