Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
..... . it is not in dispute that the applicant belongs to combatized cadre of sashastra seema bal and, therefore, governed by the provisions of sashastra seema bal act, 2007 (in short, ssb act, 2007) and rules, 2009 framed under the aforesaid act. section 3 of the ssb act, 2007 provides that officers and subordinate officers and under officers and other persons ..... enrolled under the act shall be subject to the provisions of this act and the rules. rule 8 ..... that the assistant commandant is at serial no.(viii) of the list of officers. section 4 of ssb act, 2007 provides that there shall be an armed force of the union called the sashastra seema bal for ensuring the security of the borders of india and performing such other duties as may be entrusted to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... j) applicants in this joint original application are serving as senior field assistants(m) [ sfas(m) for short] and assistant field officers(m) [ afos(m) for short] in sashastra seema bal ( ssb for short) under the ministry of home affairs. they are aggrieved by the alleged illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action on the part of the respondents in not giving them ..... . the operative part of the said order reads as under:- shri atma prakash dixist and others have filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 seeking direction to be issued to the respondents to grant them higher grade pay of rs.2800 w.e.f. 01.01.2006 with all consequential benefits ..... also they were granted the same pay scale at par with others but lesser grade pay. 13. we are, therefore, of the considered view that the respondents have acted in violation of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of india in granting lesser grade pay to the sfa, afo, fo etc. of ssb from sfa, afo, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
..... knocking the judicial doors for relief and failing everywhere. mercy could accrue to persons who are in ignorance. here, it was a deliberate decision on part of the applicant to act as the way he has done. we do not find even hints of irregularities on part of the respondent nos. 1 and 2 in this entire legal episode. 22. in ..... 09.08.2007 was issued. on the same date, a communication was received from the applicant indicating his willingness to join his duties and requesting the respondent no.2 to act accordingly. when the applicant failed to join his duties, a show cause was issued to the applicant with a direction to join his parent cadre within thirty days followed with ..... dr. b.k. sinha, member (a): 1. the applicant has filed the instant oa under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 assailing the order of the respondent no.3 dated 09.04.2008 (annexure p-1) considering the period of absence of the applicant as his deemed resignation. 2. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
..... devi (3) and others (2006) 4 scc 1, in which in para-43 the constitution bench of the honble apex court has held that the high courts acting under article 226 of the constitution of india, should not ordinarily issue directions for absorption, regularization, or permanent continuance unless the recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms ..... specifically relied upon the observation of the honble apex court in para-11 of this judgment to submit that the public service commission, being a constitutional body, must act in accordance with law, and cannot issue an order or notification extending the term of a dead list, for which it has no authority. it was further ..... been submitted by the private respondent no.r-4 personally to the office of csd. d). that the kpt is an autonomous body constituted under the major port trust act, 1963, functioning under the control of the ministry of surface transport, govt. of india. e). that as per the certificate produced by the private respondent no.r- .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... 10 staff nurses were relieved from that hospital through office order dated 09.03.2009, and they were asked to report to the medical superintendent of chacha nehru bal chikistsalaya, shastri nagar, and they have been working in that second hospital on contractual basis since then. she has pointed out that those 10 staff nurses, ..... respondents for redressal of his grievance, and since he has not exhausted the remedies by making a representation to the respondents, under section 20 of the at act, the oa should be dismissed in limine for not exhausting the alternative remedies before approaching the tribunal. in this context, the respondents had cited the judgment of ..... applicants have not exhausted the alternative remedies available to them and rushed to this tribunal and therefore, the oas are not maintainable under section 20 of the at act, 1985, and (2) that there is no violation of the terms of their contract, as already provided in the letter of offer of engagement on contractual .....
Tag this Judgment!