Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 115 delivery of lunatic accused to relatives Page 7 of about 107 results (0.337 seconds)

Tripura Jute Mills Officers Association and ors. Vs. State of Tripura ...

Court : Guwahati

..... corporation (hfc) are also government companies registered under the companies act, 1956. at this stage, i may also refer to the latest decision of the hon'ble apex court in officers & supervisors of i.d.p.l. v. ..... have disastrous consequences for the employees them selves........'13. the parties are agreed upon the point that the t.j.m.l. is a government company registered under companies act, 1956. it may also be noticed that the two corporations in a.k. bindal's case (supra), namely, fertilizer corporation of india (fci.) and hindustan fertilizer ..... has been placed under a special system of control and conferred certain privileges by virtue of the provisions contained in sections 619 and 620 of the companies act. merely because the entire shareholding is owned by the central government will not make the incorporated company part of the central government. it is also equally .....

Vijender Alias Kala Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... testimony of the victim in such cases is vital and unless there are compelling reasons which necessitate looking for corroboration of her statement, the courts should find no difficulty to act on the testimony of a victim of sexual assault alone to convict an accused where her testimony inspires confidence and is found to be reliable. seeking corroboration of her statement .....

VipIn Sehgal and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... father-in-law used to gulati vineet 2014.03.19 10:20 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm no.m-7860 of 2013 -4- act in dictatorial manner and brother-in-law and sister-in-law also used to interfere some times in the matter and she was not allowed to bolt the room and .....

Present: Mr. Beant Singh Advocate Vs. Harbans Singh ........ Petitione ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... that said bhajan singh also left behind respondent no.2 as his legal heir being his widow and got sanctioned mutation in his name. now the question arises, whether the act of the petitioner in claiming himself to be the sole heir of the deceased and getting mutation sanctioned in his favour would constitute offence under section 415 ipc punishable under .....

Dr. Rajwant Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)149PLR511

..... were possessed of potential value. it was held that the layout sanction was, obtained three years after publication of the notification under section 4(1) of the act. there was no development in the neighborhood. it must be established, as a fact, that the potential purpose does exist, as on the date of the ..... in respect to land acquired under notification dated 5.7.1982. dissatisfied with the rates determined by the collector, land owners sought reference under section 18 of the act from the collector who made various references to the additional district judge, karnal. these references were decided by the said court on different dates. the reference court, ..... .1982. on completion of the acquisition proceedings, various patches of land around karnal were acquired and consequential awards made and published in terms of section 11 of the act. the land acquisition collector determined the rate of compensation at rs. 28,512/- per acre for chhahi nehri land, rs. 22,080/- per acre for barani, .....

P. Lalithamma and Others Vs. the Commissioner, Bangalore City Corporat ...

Court : Karnataka

..... same has been registered in crime no.74 of 2003 for the offence punishable under sec.338 and 304 (a) of ipc and under sec.272 and 437 of forest act against the officials of the respondent. in the complaint it is clearly stated that the tree was infected and though representation was given no steps have been taken by the ..... (this writ appeal is filed u/s 4 of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.46526/2003 dated 15/12/2005) 1. this appeal is filed by the unsuccessful writ petitioners in w. .....

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Mahinder Kaur and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... deceased, the claimants seek enhancement of the same on the ground of wrong deduction while assessing dependency. the claim petition brought under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 [for short the act .].has been allowed by learned tribunal vide the impugned award in a sum of ` 23,15,000/-. surjit singh, who met with fatal accident on 8.1.2010 ..... ) r.c.r.(civil) 42 where it is clearly laid down that the financial assistance is something different from the amount payable under the act and the said amount cannot be deducted from the compensation payable under the act. the deceased has though, been unmarried, his unmarried sister has been dependent upon him who was younger to him in age. if the .....

Bijender @ Naushad Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... him and ultimately he was declared a proclaimed offender on 28.9.2011. this led to filing of a supplementary charge sheet against him under section 174a of the act. pw10 who executed the process issued under section 82 of cr.p.c. stated that he visited the given address of the appellant his father met him and stated ..... the house after house trespass. therefore, the entry in the house of the complainant for the purpose of committing theft amounted to house breaking punishable under section 454 of the act. therefore, no fault can be found with the conviction of the appellant under section 454 of ipc.19. the appellant was released on bail during investigation of the case. ..... in the hands of a person carrying it is visible to the victim of the crime, it does have the intended effect of intimidating the victim and such an act also contain an implicit threat to use the weapon against the victim in case he resists the offender from executing his plan. therefore, carrying a deadly weapon which is .....

Sunheri Devi and Others Vs. Sewa Singh and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .2004 acj934that only those claimants having annual income upto `40,000/-, can take benefit of provisions of section 163-a of motor vehicle act, 1988. it also took the view that it is clear from the ddr that deceased himself was to be blamed for the accident. the accident took place due to ..... claimant has claimed that income of the deceased was above `40,000/- p.a.and therefore, the claim petition is not maintainable under section 163-a of motor vehicle act, 1988. the tribunal took the view by placing reliance on a judgment of hon'ble the supreme court in deepal girishbhai soni and others versus united india insurance co.ltd ..... 8.2004 passed by motor accident claims tribunal, patiala (for short `the tribunal') vide which the claim petition of the appellants under section 163-a of the motor vehicle act, 1988 was dismissed with costs. as per the case put up by the claimants before the tribunal, tulsi dutt alongwith balram singh was travelling on 1.1.2001 on .....

Mr.Prashaanth Balasubramaniam Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

..... (amendment) ordinance, 2014 (no.3 of 2014) dated 28.5.2014 passed by the 1st respondent substituting section 5(8) of telecom regulatory authority of india act, 1997 pursuant to which mr.nirpendra misra has been designated as the principal secretary to the honourable prime minister.2. mr.nithyaesh natraj, learned counsel appearing for the ..... the central government for the first time under the impugned ordinance to grant prior approval in a given case. when the promulgation of the ordinance is a legislative act, then exercise of the discretion given to central government can be questioned. if the grievance of the petitioner is that the discretion has been wrongly exercised, ..... .wadhwa vs. state of bihar, (1987 scr (1) 798), the supreme court was dealing with re-promulgation of ordinance by governor without getting them replaced by acts. the facts of the present case are totally different. we do not find any substance in the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the .....