Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 107 enrolment paper Sorted by: recent Year: 2019 Page 5 of about 169 results (0.156 seconds)

Sep 20 2019 (HC)

Abhay Dewan Alias Gappy vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-20-2019

..... 9811149379 was used by his wife i.e. appellant/mahima dewan. the prosecution has been able to bring on record that mobile no.9999294987 was issued in the name of seema, mother of appellant/runeet gulati. dw-4 during cross examination deposed that "accused runeet gulati was carrying his mobile phone having mobile no.9999297987 during stay at my home ..... crl.a. 1175/2018 & other connected matters page 151 of 159 to such agreement says that when two or more persons agree or cause to be done an illegal act or an act, which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement is designated a "criminal conspiracy". it then provides an exception to the effect that no agreement except an ..... must relate to doing or causing to be done either crl.a. 1175/2018 & other connected matters page 142 of 159 joshi v. state jagdish (a) an illegal act; (b) an act which is not illegal in itself but is done by illegal means. it is now, however, well settled that a conspiracy ordinarily is hatched in secrecy. the court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2019 (HC)

Mahima Dewan vs.state(govt of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-20-2019

..... 9811149379 was used by his wife i.e. appellant/mahima dewan. the prosecution has been able to bring on record that mobile no.9999294987 was issued in the name of seema, mother of appellant/runeet gulati. dw-4 during cross examination deposed that "accused runeet gulati was carrying his mobile phone having mobile no.9999297987 during stay at my home ..... crl.a. 1175/2018 & other connected matters page 151 of 159 to such agreement says that when two or more persons agree or cause to be done an illegal act or an act, which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement is designated a "criminal conspiracy". it then provides an exception to the effect that no agreement except an ..... must relate to doing or causing to be done either crl.a. 1175/2018 & other connected matters page 142 of 159 joshi v. state jagdish (a) an illegal act; (b) an act which is not illegal in itself but is done by illegal means. it is now, however, well settled that a conspiracy ordinarily is hatched in secrecy. the court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2019 (HC)

Jatin vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-20-2019

..... 9811149379 was used by his wife i.e. appellant/mahima dewan. the prosecution has been able to bring on record that mobile no.9999294987 was issued in the name of seema, mother of appellant/runeet gulati. dw-4 during cross examination deposed that "accused runeet gulati was carrying his mobile phone having mobile no.9999297987 during stay at my home ..... crl.a. 1175/2018 & other connected matters page 151 of 159 to such agreement says that when two or more persons agree or cause to be done an illegal act or an act, which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement is designated a "criminal conspiracy". it then provides an exception to the effect that no agreement except an ..... must relate to doing or causing to be done either crl.a. 1175/2018 & other connected matters page 142 of 159 joshi v. state jagdish (a) an illegal act; (b) an act which is not illegal in itself but is done by illegal means. it is now, however, well settled that a conspiracy ordinarily is hatched in secrecy. the court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2019 (HC)

State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.sandeep Madaan

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-20-2019

..... of the victim nor the school authorities reported the matter to the police and technically are liable for prosecution u/s 21 of pocso act. this delay has not been explained by the prosecution. though the mother of the victim claimed that she was under threat from her in ..... 2019 crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p.418/2019 page 1 of 11 1. the present application under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, filed on behalf of the petitioner, seeks condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the leave petition.2. issue notice.3. mr. ..... and pushpa madaan, the respondents of charges framed against them, for commission of offences punishable under section 6 pocso act read with section 5 (m) and (p) of the said act against the former, and for offences under section 21 pocso crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p. ..... 418/2019 page 2 of 11 act read with section 506 indian penal code against the latter. in a nutshell, the facts of the case as elaborated by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2019 (HC)

State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.pushpa Madaan

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-20-2019

..... of the victim nor the school authorities reported the matter to the police and technically are liable for prosecution u/s 21 of pocso act. this delay has not been explained by the prosecution. though the mother of the victim claimed that she was under threat from her in ..... 2019 crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p.418/2019 page 1 of 11 1. the present application under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, filed on behalf of the petitioner, seeks condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the leave petition.2. issue notice.3. mr. ..... and pushpa madaan, the respondents of charges framed against them, for commission of offences punishable under section 6 pocso act read with section 5 (m) and (p) of the said act against the former, and for offences under section 21 pocso crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p. ..... 418/2019 page 2 of 11 act read with section 506 indian penal code against the latter. in a nutshell, the facts of the case as elaborated by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2019 (HC)

Re-Attar Filte Limited Vs....

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-20-2019

..... 7. heard the learned counsel for the official liquidator.8. from the submissions it seems that the liquidation process has been carried out duly, as per the act. as eventually there was just one claimant, hence, adherence to sections 529, 529a and 530 is not required, and accordingly disbursement as prayed for can be ..... deducting the necessary government commissions, fee, liquidation expenses from the available company fund balance.; ii. the company may kindly be dissolved under section 481 of the companies act, 1956 read with 9 of the companies (court) rules, 1959 and the official liquidator may be discharged as the liquidator of the company, and accordingly be directed ..... ms. justice jyoti singh jyoti singh, j.(oral) co. appl. no.991/2019 1. this is an application filed by the official liquidator under section 481, companies act, 1956, read with rule 281 of the company (court) rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred as ccr), seeking the following prayers: i. the official liquidator may kindly be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2019 (HC)

Ashok vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-20-2019

..... , courts cannot start with a presumption that police records are untrustworthy. as a proposition of law, the presumption should be the other way around, that official acts of the police have been performed regularly, which is a wise principle of presumption and recognized even by the legislature. hence, when a police officer gives evidence ..... and robbery have been proved to have been integral parts of the same transaction and therefore the presumption arising under illustration (a) of section 114 evidence act is that not only the appellant committed the murder of the deceased but also committed robbery of her ornaments. we therefore do not find any reason to ..... 2016 respectively, the trial court convicted the accused badal and ashok as follows: - the accused badal was convicted and sentenced under the provision of section 25 arms act to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years with fine of rs 25, 000/- and in default of payment of fine, sentenced to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2019 (HC)

Rakesh Kumar Jain vs.dr. Amrit Lal Shukla

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2019

..... order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from shop no.3 of property bearing 1372, shastri nagar, delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition.3. learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2019 (HC)

Harish Kumar Garg vs.dr. Amrit Lal Shukla

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2019

..... order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from shop no.1 of property bearing 1372, shastri nagar, delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. rc.rev .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2019 (HC)

Deepak Khanna vs.dr. Amrit Lal Shukla

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2019

..... order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from shop no.2 of property bearing 1372, shastri nagar, delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. rc.rev .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //