Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 107 enrolment paper Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 12 of about 1,095 results (0.098 seconds)

Jul 04 2022 (HC)

Mr Jitendra Virwani Vs. Mr Pardhanani Chatrabhuj Bassarmal

Court : Karnataka

..... to quash the complaint that led to registration of crime in the aforementioned criminal case instituted for offences punishable under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881 ( the act for short).2. accused no.1/1st petitioner - omr investments llp (for short the firm or company ) is a limited liability partnership firm ..... person/s in respect of or pertaining to the legal proceedings after taking my approval in writing. g. to generally do, execute, perform any other act or acts, deed or deeds, matter and things whatsoever which in the opinion of my attorney ought to be done, executed performed in relation to the schedule property ..... of the appellant company had authorised mr. subhasis kumar das, general manager (accounting) to institute criminal proceedings, including proceedings under the provisions of the n.i. act and civil proceedings on behalf of the company against m/s. sms asia private limited (respondent), to represent the company and take all necessary actions in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2022 (HC)

M/s Omr Investments Llp Vs. Mr Pardhannani Chatrabhuj Bassarmal

Court : Karnataka

..... to quash the complaint that led to registration of crime in the aforementioned criminal case instituted for offences punishable under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881 ( the act for short).2. accused no.1/1st petitioner - omr investments llp (for short the firm or company ) is a limited liability partnership firm ..... person/s in respect of or pertaining to the legal proceedings after taking my approval in writing. g. to generally do, execute, perform any other act or acts, deed or deeds, matter and things whatsoever which in the opinion of my attorney ought to be done, executed performed in relation to the schedule property ..... of the appellant company had authorised mr. subhasis kumar das, general manager (accounting) to institute criminal proceedings, including proceedings under the provisions of the n.i. act and civil proceedings on behalf of the company against m/s. sms asia private limited (respondent), to represent the company and take all necessary actions in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 2022 (HC)

State Of Karnataka Vs. A V Krishnamurthy

Court : Karnataka

..... evidence of prosecution witnesses such as evidence of pw.1, 4 and 8. but it is relevant to refer section 134 of indian evidence act. in the 19 criminal justice delivery system, the quality of evidence is an important aspect, it must be quality of evidence and not ..... fir for the offence under sections 498a, 304b, 306 r/w 34 of ipc, 1860 beside sections 3, 4 and 6 of dp act, 1961.6. subsequent to filing of charge sheet by the investigating agency, the case was committed to the sessions court whereby s.c. ..... acquittal for the offence under sections 498a, 304b, 306 r/w 34 of ipc and sections 3, 4 and 6 of d.p.act and to convict the accused for the aforesaid offences. 52. the case in crl.a.no.1003/2015 is preferred by the state ..... ; and convict the respondents no.1 to 3 for an offence under sections 498a, 304b of ipc and sections 3 & 4 of d.p.act. in crl.a.no.1003/2015 between: state of karnataka represented by channapatna rural police station ramanagara 571501. ...appellant (by smt. rashmi jadhav .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 2022 (HC)

K Shanthamma Vs. A.v. Krishnamurthy

Court : Karnataka

..... evidence of prosecution witnesses such as evidence of pw.1, 4 and 8. but it is relevant to refer section 134 of indian evidence act. in the 19 criminal justice delivery system, the quality of evidence is an important aspect, it must be quality of evidence and not ..... fir for the offence under sections 498a, 304b, 306 r/w 34 of ipc, 1860 beside sections 3, 4 and 6 of dp act, 1961.6. subsequent to filing of charge sheet by the investigating agency, the case was committed to the sessions court whereby s.c. ..... acquittal for the offence under sections 498a, 304b, 306 r/w 34 of ipc and sections 3, 4 and 6 of d.p.act and to convict the accused for the aforesaid offences. 52. the case in crl.a.no.1003/2015 is preferred by the state ..... ; and convict the respondents no.1 to 3 for an offence under sections 498a, 304b of ipc and sections 3 & 4 of d.p.act. in crl.a.no.1003/2015 between: state of karnataka represented by channapatna rural police station ramanagara 571501. ...appellant (by smt. rashmi jadhav .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2022 (HC)

Smt. Darshini Vs. Sri. B.a. Talkheen Ahmed

Court : Karnataka

..... tribunal.24. the only challenge is to the finding that on remarriage, the widow lose the right to claim the compensation. the purpose of enactment of the motor vehicles act is to award compensation for loss of income on the death of the person and other heads. in the present case, since appellant-darshini got remarried dr. mallikarjuna ..... unrepresented; v/o. dated0908.2021 r-3 is treated as lr s of deceased r-4 and r-5) *** this miscellaneous first appeal is filed under section1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated2304.2016 passed in mvc no.5616/2013 on the file of the member, mact, 20th additional small cause judge, bengaluru, partly allowing the ..... but unrepresented; v/o. dated0908.2021 r-3 is treated as lr s of deceased r-4 and r-5) *** this miscellaneous first appeal is filed under section1731) of mv act, against the judgment and award dated2304.2016 passed in mvc no.4734/2010 on the file of the xx additional small cause judge, member, mact, bangalore, dismissing the claim .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2022 (HC)

Devaraju Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 18-12-2012 convicted the accused persons for the offences punishable under sections 32 and 34 of the excise act and sentenced them accordingly. as observed above, both the accused persons preferred an appeal before the learned sessions judge s court, which after hearing both side ..... the purpose of manufacturing any intoxicant other than toddy; or (f) removes any intoxicant from any distillery, brewery or warehouse licensed, established or continued under this act; or (g) bottles any liquor; shall on conviction be punished for each offence with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and ..... is proportionate to the gravity of the proven guilt though deserves to be confirmed, but their conviction for the offence punishable under section 34 of the excise act since now proved to be uncalled for and perverse, interference by this court to that limited extent is warranted. accordingly, i proceed to pass the following: .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2022 (HC)

Nagaraju Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 18-12-2012 convicted the accused persons for the offences punishable under sections 32 and 34 of the excise act and sentenced them accordingly. as observed above, both the accused persons preferred an appeal before the learned sessions judge s court, which after hearing both side ..... the purpose of manufacturing any intoxicant other than toddy; or (f) removes any intoxicant from any distillery, brewery or warehouse licensed, established or continued under this act; or (g) bottles any liquor; shall on conviction be punished for each offence with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and ..... is proportionate to the gravity of the proven guilt though deserves to be confirmed, but their conviction for the offence punishable under section 34 of the excise act since now proved to be uncalled for and perverse, interference by this court to that limited extent is warranted. accordingly, i proceed to pass the following: .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2022 (HC)

Mahammad Ali Akbar @ Ali Umar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... no.1 of 2019 registered for offences punishable under sections 376 and 506 of the ipc and sections 4 and 6 of the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 ( the act for short) is before this court calling in question order dated 07-04-2022 rejecting the application filed by him under section 311 of the cr.p.c ..... hue and cry of the incident he would upload such photographs on the social media and that became offence punishable under section 506 of the ipc and the alleged sexual acts became offence under section 376 of the ipc. a crime came to be registered invoking the aforesaid provisions of law. the police, after investigation, have filed a charge ..... daughter. the learned counsel would submit that it is also the case of the father of the victim in his cross-examination that the petitioner has not committed any sexual act on the victim. it is on these grounds, he has sought recalling of the witness. 56. on the other hand, the learned high court government pleader representing the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2022 (HC)

Shree Cement Limited Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... date of prior to the date of commencement of the mines commencement of the mines and minerals (development and and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, regulation) amendment act, 2015 shall become ineligible. 2015 shall become ineligible. (2) without prejudice to subs (2) without prejudice to subs section (1), the following ..... mineral resources; and that it will alleviate the procedural delay, which in turn would check slowdown which adversely affected the growth of mining sector.19. the amendment act, 2015, as is evident from the objects, aims at: (i) eliminating discretion; (ii) improving transparency in the allocation of mineral resources; (iii) ..... amendment would operate prospectively unless it is expressly made retrospective or its retrospective operation follows as a matter of necessary implication . the amending act obviously does not make the relevant provision retrospective in terms and we see no reason to accept the suggestion that the retrospective operation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2022 (HC)

Shree Cement Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... date of prior to the date of commencement of the mines commencement of the mines and minerals (development and and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, regulation) amendment act, 2015 shall become ineligible. 2015 shall become ineligible. (2) without prejudice to subs (2) without prejudice to subs section (1), the following ..... mineral resources; and that it will alleviate the procedural delay, which in turn would check slowdown which adversely affected the growth of mining sector.19. the amendment act, 2015, as is evident from the objects, aims at: (i) eliminating discretion; (ii) improving transparency in the allocation of mineral resources; (iii) ..... amendment would operate prospectively unless it is expressly made retrospective or its retrospective operation follows as a matter of necessary implication . the amending act obviously does not make the relevant provision retrospective in terms and we see no reason to accept the suggestion that the retrospective operation of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //