Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 107 enrolment paper Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Page 6 of about 1,090 results (0.162 seconds)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Rep. by Its Assistant Administrative Offic ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008ACJ1459; AIR2008Kant85; ILR2008KAR959; 2008(5)KarLJ697; ILR2008(1)Kar959; 2008(5)KLJ697; 2008(2)KCCRSN87; 2008(2)AIRKarR562; AIR2008Kar85; 2008ACJ1459; 2008AIHC2090(Kar)(DB)

..... ., apart from contending that the compensation amount claimed by the petitioner to be exhorbitant and not based on any norms. liability was denied contending that it is an act policy. based on the pleadings, the tribunal has framed issues and after enquiring into the matter, has passed the judgment and award dt. 20th may, 2004, awarding ..... for enhancement of compensation. per contra, sri. arun ponnappa, learned counsel for the respondent-insurance co. would contend that the claim petition under section 163a of the act is not maintainable, in view of the fact that, the petitioner was the rider of scooter meg 1913, involved in the accident and himself being the cause ..... account of accident arising from the use of motor vehicles can be claimed under the common law even without the aid of a statute. the provisions of the mv act permits that compensation paid under 'no fault liability' can be deducted from the final amount awarded by the tribunal. therefore, these two are resting on two different .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Rep. by the Senior Divisional Manager Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009ACJ908; 2009(5)KarLJ68

..... sustained fatal injuries, has later succumbed. his legal representatives, respondent 3 to 7 herein, had filed a claim petition under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (for short the act) against the appellant in the motor accident claims tribunal-v, bangalore city (for short 'tribunal') claiming compensation. the tribunal considering the said claim petition along ..... , the deceased admittedly was a cleaner in the vehicle and hence the appellant was not required to cover the risk of a cleaner under section 147 of the act. learned counsel relied upon the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of ramashray singh v. new india assurance co. ltd and ors. reported ..... for their maintenance. there is no dispute that the deceased was a cleaner of the bus, which was a public service vehicle.8. chapter xi of the act covers the subject insurance of motor vehicles against 'third party risks'. section 146(1) provides that no person shall use a motor vehicle in public, unless there .....

Rama Bhat S/O Padmanabha Bhat (Since Deceased by Lrs. and ors.) and Sm ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR756:2009(2)KCCR1083:2009(1)AIRKarR380

..... the law continues to remain so post - 1976 amendment. in a suit seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell governed by the provisions of the specific relief act, 1963 the court has a discretion to decree specific performance of the agreement. the plaintiff may also claim compensation under section 21 or any other relief to which he ..... is in his favour, he is entitled to support without taking any cross objection and that there is no change of law, post amendment to, after the amended act 104/1976 with effect from 1.2.1977 to cpc. considering a case relating to suit for specific performance, wherein either the main relief or alternative relief can be ..... it seems to be reasonably clear that there can be no question of any standard rent in respect of them, since the standard rent is creature of the rent act. paragraph 4 of sch. a, however, requires the rent control authorities first to determine the standard rent payable by the intermediate tenant in respect of the premises concerned. .....

Vijaya Bank, Residency Road Branch Vs. Dynasty Holdings (P) Ltd., a Co ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(4)KarLJ105; 2009(2)KCCR991; 2009(2)AIRKarR76; AIR2009NOC1284(D.B)

..... the tenant has no vested right nor acquired any right therein.21. in the case of mercury press (supra), it has been held that krc act, 1961 (old act) was merely intended to extend certain protection to the tenants against the unbridled power of the landlord to vacate a tenant under the general law of ..... mesne profits against defendant. defendant contested the suit by filing the written statement inter alia contending that, it is a tenant protected under the karnataka rent control act, 1961 ('krc act, 1961', for short) and therefore, the suit is not maintainable; that there was no proper termination of tenancy; that in view of the continued ..... and the law governing the property relations. these rights and remedies continue to govern their relationship unless they are regulated by such protective legislation as the present act in which case the said rights and remedies remain suspended till the protective legislation continues in operation. hence while it can legitimately be said that the .....

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Now Rep. by Its Regional Manager the O ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(4)KarLJ121:2009(1)KCCR734:2009(3)AIRKarR412:AIR2009NOC1720(D.B

..... made in such application, the application shall contain a separate statement to the effect immediately before the signature of the applicantsection 163-a: notwithstanding anything contained in this act or in any other law for the time being in force or instrument having the force of law, the owner of the motor vehicle or the authorised insurer ..... ii and also by awarding compensation on conventional heads in terms of the same. he further submits that under sub-section (2) of section 163a of the act it is not necessary to establish negligence and therefore the petition was maintainable and thus the award of the tribunal does not call for interference in this appeal ..... claim petition was converted to one under section 163a and the tribunal after allowing the said amendment has awarded compensation in terms of schedule-ii to the said act by restricting the annual income of the deceased to rs. 39,000/- although the deceased was receiving over and above the said income by applying the multiplier .....

H.V. Vijayaraghavan and anr. Vs. Malathi Das and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(5)KarLJ375; 2009(4)KCCR2313; 2009(4)AIRKarR385(D.B)

..... 2007 sc 1675 : 2007 air scw 2571 : (2007) 5 scc 85, held as under:d. statue law - when statute prescribes a particular manner for doing a particular act, that act must be done in that manner alone.16. ...there is no option left with any one to give up or waive any mode and not all such modes have to ..... direction issued by this court in suresh heblikar's case.35.1 it is a well-settled law that when a statute prescribes a particular manner for doing a particular act, that act must be done in that manner alone (taylor v. taylor (1876) 1 ch. d. 426).35.2 the above well-settled position is constantly applied by ..... 13 acres 5 guntas situate at gottigere village, uttarahalli hobli, bangalore south taluk. the lands were converted for non-agricultural residential purposes under the provisions of karnataka land revenue act, 1964. after obtaining necessary approvals, the land was developed and houses have been built. the fourth accused has issued an endorsement on 22-11-2001 assuring the complainants .....

Airport Authority Employees Union Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(4)KarLJ366

..... the authorities prescribed under the companies act, which should have been done only in the manner in which it is prescribed, otherwise, it will amount to serious error in exercising the power of judicial ..... not be proper and permissible for this court to violate the rules of practice and when the legislature has specifically prescribed the rules of practice under the companies act safeguarding the properties of the companies, either private or public sector, it may not be permissible for this court to usurp such jurisdiction which are conferred under ..... books of accounts etc., of the company concerned. if the grievance falls outside the scope of sub-sections (6) and (7) of section 234 of the act, the registrar is also under obligation to send the report to the central government based on which, the 2nd respondent may investigate into the matter.2.3 the .....

Shrimathi W/O Ramesh Nayak Vs. Renuka W/O Late Bharat Bhushan

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2010CriLJ372; 2010(1)KarLJ197; 2009(6)AIRKarR394

..... the above observations of the hon'ble supreme court, i am of the considered view that the presumption under section 139 of n.i. act extends only to the issuing of cheque towards discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability and it has to be raised only after the complainant establishes that ..... principles of legal jurisprudence, namely presumption of innocence as human rights and the doctrine of reverse burden introduced by section 139 should be delicately balanced. such balancing acts, indisputably would largely depend upon the factual matrix of each case., the materials brought on record and having regard to legal principles governing the same.19. following ..... or other liability' means a legally enforceable debt or other liability.13. a careful reading of the above provisions of section 138 and 139 of n.i. act it is clear that in order to raise the presumption under section 139, the complainant has to establish the fact that 'he received the cheque' in question .....

Sri. Nanjappa S/O Sri. Gonajja Vs. Sri Doddaiah S/O Sri. Erachikkaiah ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 5.9.1966 (ex.d1) on behalf of kum.rangamma, without obtaining permission from the court, as contemplated under section 8 of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956 ('the act' for short) and that, no right was acquired by the purchaser-eraiah, son of gowdannanavara era chikkaiah and he could not have conveyed the property in favour ..... in the case of madhegowda. consequently, it is unnecessary to deal with the contention in greater detail. suffice to notice that, in the case of sri. narayan bal, natural guardians of their minor sons along with another, who was the kartha of the joint family, had together executed the sale deed pertaining to certain joint family ..... being the kartha, had the right to take decisions in the interest of minor rangamma. strong reliance was placed on the decision in the case of sri. narayan bal (supra) to contend that, in the circumstances of the case, previous permission of the court under section 3 for disposing of the undivided interest of minor rangamma, .....

NanjappA. Vs. Doddiah and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2294; 2010(2)KantLJ421; 2010(2)KarLJ421

..... 5.9.1966 (ex.d1) on behalf of kum. rangamma, without obtaining permission from the court, as contemplated under section 8 of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956 (the act' for short) and that, no right was acquired by the purchaser- eraiah, son of gowdam anavara era chikkaiah and he could not have conveyed the property in ..... suffice to notice that, in the case of sri. narayan bal, natural guardians of their minor sons along with another, who was the kartha of the joint family, had together executed the sale deed pertaining to certain joint family ..... rangamma, in the joint property held by ningamma and rangamma, was not required. it has to he stated that, the decision in the case of sri. narayan bal has been noticed and its effect and applicability has been stated in the case of madhegowda. consequently, it is unnecessary to deal with the contention in greater detail. .....