Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 107 enrolment paper Court: supreme court of india Page 2 of about 626 results (0.129 seconds)

Alok Mishra Vs. Garima Mishra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(3)SCALE332; (2009)12SCC270; .2009AIRSCW6620

..... and conciliation centre delhi high court for exploring the possibilities of settlement between the parties.3. the parties agreed that ms. kamlesh mahajan and mr. inderbir singh alag, advocates would act as their conciliators/mediators in the matter of mediation and conciliation proceedings.4. the parties pursuant to discussions, deliberations and negotiations held with the assistance and help of the mediators ..... be further handed over to the respondent.3. we record our appreciation for the commendable efforts made by learned mediators of the delhi high court mediation and conciliation centre who acted as amicus curiae.4. transfers petitions are accordingly disposed of.

Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Transport Agency and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3724(SC); JT2009(14)SC79; 2009(8)SCALE720; (2009)7SCC345

..... of the arbitrators in the department of public enterprises, to be nominated by the secretary to the government of india incharge of the bureau of public enterprises. the arbitration act, 1940 shall not be applicable to the arbitration under this clause. the award of the arbitrator shall be binding upon the parties to the dispute, provided however, ..... is not applicable to the case in hand, therefore, the appointment of the arbitrator by the calcutta high court exercising jurisdiction under section 11(6) of the act was improper.5. it is well settled rule of interpretation that the section heading or marginal note can be relied upon to clear any doubt or ambiguity in ..... the interpretation of any provision and to discern the legislative intent. the section heading constitutes an important part of the act itself, and may be read not only as explaining the provisions of the section, but it also affords a better key to the constructions of the provisions of .....

Bhag Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC696; 2007(1)SCALE138; (2007)2SCC218

..... in question, does not fall under any duly notified controlled area, declared under the provisions of the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas (restriction) of un-regulated development act, 1963, now repealed. thus there are no controlled area restrictions at mandi gobindgarh, in view of the above legal position.10. that the secretary, housing and urban ..... in which air pollution control devices is not required. hence, all the remaining industrial units have complied with the provisions of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981.submitted for the kind information of the hon'ble punjab and haryana high court for issue of appropriate order in the case. 3. taking note of the report ..... was filed on 8.4.2002 by the board showing that 61 units have complied with the provisions of the air (prevention & control of pollution) act, 1981. out of remaining 27 units, 16 units have been closed down by the board under section 21/31a of the air (prevention and control of pollution .....

Lalith Mathur Vs. L. Maheswara Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2000)10SCC285

..... in any public sector undertaking. this order, in our opinion, is wholly without jurisdiction and could not have been made in proceedings under the contempt of courts act or under art.215 of the constitution. 4. the high court in the writ petition had issued a direction for the consideration of the respondent's representation by ..... one satyanarayana who was a junior to the petitioner is also being continued in service by implementing the orders passed by the authority under the shops and establishments act. under these circumstances, i do not see why the petitioner herein should be denied the same consideration.for the aforesaid reasons this contempt case is disposed of ..... 1998 which has been reiterated in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is that in view of ordinance 4 of 1997 which was subsequently replaced by act 14 of 1997 and the consequential orders cancelling goms no. 329, agriculture and cooperation (coop. i) department dated 22-5-1993, the petitioner is not .....

Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2000)2SCC217

..... . union of india3.3. after considering the arguments for some time we are of the opinion that the question whether search of the person envisaged in section 50 of the act would encompass the gunny bags found inside the autorickshaw driven by the accused, so as to attract the mandatory requirements of that provision can be considered by a larger bench ..... seized by the authorities from the autorickshaw driven by the accused himself. when a plea is made on the strength of section 50 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 the focal question is whether the gunny bags were in the physical possession of the accused or not. if they were in the physical possession of the accused the .....

Kali Prasad and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2000(8)SC503; 2000(5)SCALE368; (2000)6SCC640; [2000]Supp1SCR702

..... of those sections are attracted here. the effect of section 1(2) is that the provisions would become part of 1952 act from its inception. it follows that respondents 3 and 4 acquired right to succession of bal karan.12. it is next contended that inasmuch as the civil suit was barred in view of the provisions of section 331 ..... another contention of mr. swarup is that sister's sons of bal karan became heirs only on the passing of the u.p. zamindari abolition & land reforms (amendment) act, 1958 and it cannot be given retrospective effect.10. the amendment act was passed in 1958. the question whether that act was retrospective in nature, was considered by a division bench of ..... , read with schedule ii of the u.p. zamindari act, any finding recorded by the civil court could not be taken note of .....

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. U.P. Rajya Khanij Vikas Nigam S.S. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(3)AWC2833(SC); [2009(121)FLR424]; JT2008(6)SC489; 2008(9)SCALE1; 2008(8)Supreme453

..... pradesh absorption of retrenched employees of government or public corporations in government service rules, 1991, as amended from time to time. a public authority cannot act inconsistent with or contrary to statutory rules. it was stated that no statement was made by any officer on behalf of the corporation that the employees ..... petition was premature inasmuch as no action of retrenchment was taken by the corporation. moreover, alternative and efficacious remedy under the u.p. industrial disputes act was available to the petitioners. on merits, it was contended that in view of shrinkage in the activities of the corporation and also increase of wage ..... march 23, 1974, u.p. state mineral development corporation ltd. ('corporation' for short) was incorporated as a government company under section 617 of the companies act, 1956. the corporation was established with a view to provide acceleration in the field of mining and other incidental activities. initially, the corporation was floated with .....

T.C. Gupta Vs. Bimal Kumar Dutta and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... event his explanations were to be found unacceptable. the explanation to section 12 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, makes it clear that an apology tendered by a contemnor should not be rejected merely on the ground that it is qualified or conditional so long it is ..... contemnor guilty of commission of contempt by understanding the order dated 18.08.2011 to mean status quo or a restraint in respect of grant of licences under the haryana act of 1975.11. in an earlier part of the present order, we have noticed the unqualified and unconditional apology tendered by the appellant before the high court in the ..... in which he had understood the order dated 18.08.2011, namely, that the said order had not placed any kind of prohibition on grant of licences under the haryana act of 1975. yet, out of deference to the order of high court, no licence either for group housing or commercial activities in either sector 63-a or 67-a .....

Union of India Vs. Bgp Products Operations Gmbh and Hagene Immermatt W ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 2015. the nlem is published under the 1st schedule to the drugs (prices) control order, 2013 ( dpco ) under section 3 of the essential commodities act, 1955 ( ec act ). the nlem specifies the recommended dosage and strength of oxytocin injection as 5iu per 1 ml and 10iu per 3 1 ml. oxytocin injection in the ..... for further discussion. after deliberations, the dcc recommended that the manufacture and sale of oxytocin injections should be banned for veterinary use under section 26a of the act coupled with the condition that the manufacturers of the bulk drug oxytocin should supply the active 8 pharmaceutical ingredient ( api ) only to licensed manufacturers of ..... issue was under deliberation by the drugs technical advisory board ( dtab ) and the drugs consultative committee ( dcc ), which are statutory bodies constituted under the said act. 2 executive summary, report of the core committee for revision of the national list of essential medicines published in 2015. 3 paragraph 3.1(ii) of the .....

The Karad Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd Vs. Swwapnil Bhingardevay

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to another company by name, sarvadnya industries private limited, and that a bank 6 by name, janata sahkari bank limited, pune had taken possession of the same under the sarfaesi act; and (iv) that even the advertisement issued by the resolution professional on 30.03.2018 inviting expression of interest, was vitiated in as much as the invitation contained therein was ..... . it was not his case at all that the resolution plan was 19 submitted by the sra after the last date, but the same was predated by the resolution professional acting in collusion.32. it appears from the impugned order of nclat that only in the course of hearing of the appeal, the date 09th february 2019 type written at the .....