Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 1 short title and commencement Page 95 of about 15,287 results (0.425 seconds)

Jan 14 2014 (HC)

Satpal Banker Vs. Unknown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... court of the learned district judge, panchkula seeking dissolution of the marriage between the parties by a decree of divorce in terms of section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 ('act'-for short).the petition of satpal gaurav bhardwaj 2014.01.21 12:46 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court,chandigarh 204 cm no.8498 ..... honoured and encashed. in view of the mutual consent reached at between the parties, the joint petition filed by them in terms of section 13-b of the hindu marriage act, 1955 is allowed and the marriage between the parties is dissolved by a decree of divorce. in view of the joint petition for divorce by mutual consent being accepted, ..... , where a compromise dated 26.3.2012 (ex.c-1) was reached at. in consequence of the compromise, a joint petition in terms of section 13-b of the act was filed for dissolution of the marriage between the parties by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. the initial petition (cm no.22961-cii of 2012) that was filed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2014 (HC)

Narender Pal and Another Vs. Saroj Devi and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... driving the same, a distinct licence is required to be obtained. the distinction between a transport vehicle and a passenger vehicle can also be noticed from section 14 of the act. sub- section (2) of section 14 provides for duration of a period of shanker gauri 2014.01.28 18:27 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of ..... vehicle constructed or adapted for use solely for the carriage of goods, or any motor vehicle not so constructed or adapted when used for the carriage of goods. the said act also defines heavy goods vehicle , heavy passenger motor vehicle , medium goods vehicle and medium passenger motor vehicle as well as a light motor vehicle in section 2 (21) ..... could not be able to controvert this argument.4. i have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file.5. section 3 of the motor vehicle act reads as under:- 3.necessity for driving licence.- (1) no person shall drive a motor vehicle in any public place unless he holds an effective driving licence issued .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2014 (HC)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. State of Haryana and An ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... meeting the mandatory requirement of section 202 cr.p.c., though the appellants were outside his territorial jurisdiction. the provisions of section 202 cr.p.c.were amended vide amendment act 2005, making it mandatory to postpone the issue of process where the accused resides in an area beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the magistrate concerned. the same was found necessary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2014 (HC)

Ms. Monika Jalota Advocate Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... distressing feature for the defence and, therefore, goes against the accused in view of the law laid down wherein while interpreting the provision of section 103 of the evidence act, it has been held that where the accused fails to prove the plea of alibi leaves to the irresistible conclusion that they were guilty. thus from all this ..... raju, dinesh and vijay and, therefore, suddenly puts an end to this crucial phase of the investigations. no doubt under the provisions of section 25 of the evidence act statement made before a police official is inadmissible in evidence qua the accused and pw-2 asi sr.niwas is no exception jyoti 2014.02.25 16:05 i ..... 2 that a case registered by way of fir no.39 dated 13.03.2004 under sections 302/120-b/364/201 ipc read with section 25 of the arms act pertaining to police station city bahadurgarh on the statement of complainant devender gupta against nine accused namely, dharmender @ dhauna, rajesh @ raju, swaran singh @ tony sardar, kuldeep @ monu, rajesh @ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2014 (HC)

iqbal Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... of compromise. in iqbal singh and others fir no.144 dated september 16, 2013 under sections 307, 324, 323, 148, 149 ipc read with sections 25 and 27 of arms act, police station ghall khurd, district ferozepur, was registered at the instance of harbans singh alleging that the petitioners have assaulted and fired at the complainant and other respondents injuring respondent ..... (crl.) 1052, petitions are allowed. fir no.fir no.144 dated september 16, 2013 under sections 307, 324, 323, 148, 149 ipc read with sections 25 and 27 of arms act registered at police station ghall khurd, district ferozepur, and ddr no.27 under sections 324, 323, 148, 149 ipc registered at police station ghall khurd district ferozepur and all the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2014 (HC)

Ashok Dhar Vs. the State and ors

Court : Delhi

..... of late shri manmohan dhar.2. it is alleged in the petition that deceased was a hindu, governed by the hindu succession act, 1956. he was permanent resident of c-56, kailash apartments, lala lajpat rai marg, new delhi. he died on 21st january, 2009 at lilavati hospital in mumbai. deceased made and ..... no.10 in person coram: hon'ble mr. justice a.k. pathak a.k. pathak, j.(oral) 1. petitioner has filed this petition under section 276 of the indian succession act, 1925 for grant of probate of the will dated 14th august, 2001 of late shri manmohan dhar. respondent no.3 is sister and respondent nos. 4 to 8 are brothers .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2014 (HC)

Present : Mr.Gaurav Bakshi Advocate for the Petitioner. Vs. Naresh Sin ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... of the writ petition, was acquired by the state of haryana vide notifications dated 20.04.1990 and 18.04.1991 issued under sections 4 & 6 of the land acquisition act, 1894, respectively and the compensation was paid in the year 1993. the father of the petitioner unfortunately passed away on 02.02.1999. it is stated that other legal heirs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. P.K.Gupta Advocate Vs. Hardeep Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .nitin thatai, advocate for the respondent. ****** mahavir s.chauhan, j.(oral) hardeep kaur, the respondent herein, filed a complaint under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, claiming various reliefs. she also filed an application for interim relief. however, her prayer did not find favour with the judicial magistrate ist class, khanna and accordingly her application ..... instead of passing interim residence order, she is allowed some amount to be paid to her as rent as an interim measure as per section 19 (1) (f) of the act. . to challenge to the order dated 10.5.2012, the instant petition has been brought by the petitioners.namely, baljit kaur, (mother-in-law).tejpal singh (father-in-law).harvinder .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2014 (HC)

Rameshwar and Another Vs. Rajiv Shastri Alias Rajbir Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... this petition challenging the orders dated 03.02.2012 and 15.01.2013 (annexures p-1 and p-2 respectively).petitioners moved an application under the payment of wages act, 1936 (in short 'act') claiming that they had been engaged by the respondent to construct their house. it was agreed that the petitioners would be paid ` 200/- per day each. ..... construction work. however, they had not been paid their wages for the period they worked. respondent in his reply averred that the application moved by the petitioners under the act was not maintainable. in fact, petitioners had earlier filed suit for sandeep sethi 2014.03.03 14:49 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cr ..... directed to affix the requisite court fee. instead of paying the court fee, petitioners withdrew the suit and thereafter, filed an application before the competent authority under the act. petitioners had concealed the factum of filing of the civil suit by them at the time of moving the application under the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2014 (HC)

Yogesh Kumar and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... to cruelty and/or harassment in connection with demand for dowry by yogesh. the court, therefore, is required to presume, as provided in section 113b of evidence act that the appellant yogesh had caused her dowry death. no evidence has been led by the appellant yogesh which would prove that mamta died on account of reasons other ..... are given or expected in marriages in our country, would, considering the objective sought to be achieved by incorporating section 304-b in indian penal code and enacting dowry prohibition act, 1961 fall within the purview of section 304-b of ipc. in fact, in pawan kr. & ors. vs. state of haryana air1998sc958 the hon ble supreme court ..... to analyze the facts and circumstances leading to the death of the victim and then decide whether there was any proximate connection between the demand of dowry or the act of cruelty or harassment and the death of the victim. in kamesh panjiyar vs. state of bihar (2005) 2 scc388 the apex court, considering the expression dowry .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //