Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 1 short title and commencement Court: punjab and haryana Page 54 of about 565 results (0.387 seconds)

Sep 23 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Rajinder Kumar Singla Advocate Vs. Ranjit Kaur and Others ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... in civil hospital sahnewal and the report is exhibit p-2.2. widow and three minor children of darshan singh filed claim application under section 166 of the motor vehicles act before the motor accident claims tribunal (for short the tribunal .), ludhiana.3. it was pleaded by them that the deceased was aged about 45 years. he was running business in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Bipan Sharma Advocate Vs. U.T., Chandigarh and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... ) under section 292 of the indian penal code, 1860, registered at police station sector 36, chandigarh and challan dated 6.6.2013 under section 66, 43 (f) of information technology act, 2000 and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record available on the file carefully. prosecution story .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2013 (HC)

New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Savita Kumari and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... are not entitled to compensation and do not fall in the category of legal representatives of the deceased, entitled to maintain a claim petition under section 166(1) of the act. in my opinion, on both the points the appeal is bound to fail. `10740/- is the basic pension and if the dearness allowance is admissible on the same @ 58% , the ..... 02.01.2012. on his death, his wife savita kumari and his two sons vikas sharma and amit kumar brought a claim petition under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 seeking compensation in a sum of `35,00,000/-. learned tribunal vide the impugned award has allowed the claim petition in a sum of `12,24,000/-. the deceased .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... accordingly has prayed for allowing the writ petition by holding the impugned provisions of the 2001 act to be ultra-vires and beyond the legislative competence of the state of punjab. on the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent- state has referred to ..... and another versus cepham milk specialties ltd.and others.(2004) 8 scc621 wherein levy of milk cess by the state of punjab under the punjab dairy development board act has been struck down being arbitrary and discriminatory. the counsel has taken us through the said judgement in extenso to assert the same grounds before us and ..... of sections 3,6 and 9 of the haryana murrah buffalo and other milch animal breed (preservation and development of animal husbandry and dairy development sector) act, 2001 (for short, 2001 act .).as far as it applies to milk plants registered under the milk and milk products order 1992 of the central government, imposing a cess and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2014 (HC)

Mohd. Nadeem Vs. State U.T. Chandigarh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... code of criminal procedure for bail in case fir no.386 dated 05.12.2005 registered for offences under sections 399 and 402 ipc and section 25 of the arms act at police station sector-34, chandigarh. the petitioner did not appear in that case and was declared proclaimed offender. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2014 (HC)

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Iqbal ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... due amount alongwith interest as per the policy guidelines of huda. the huda preferred revision petition before the state government under section 17(9) of the haryana urban development authority act, 1977, which has been accepted vide the impugned order observing as follows:- .....the allottee in the present case miserably failed to deposit the demanded price in the given time. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 2014 (HC)

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Through Its Manager Regional Office V ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... kumar 2014.01.20 12:18 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh fao no.6037 of 2012 -3- under section 149 of the motor vehicles act. the insurance company can urge under section 149 only that the vehicle was put to use for purpose other than what the permit provided. it is the purpose of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2014 (HC)

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. State of Haryana and ors. ….

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... 43) for the reasons aforestated, the writ petitions are allowed; the impugned notifications dated 2nd june, 2009 and 2nd june, 2010 issued under sections 4&6 of the act and the award dated 29th may, 2012 to the extent of acquisition of their respective land are, hereby, quashed. (44) ordered accordingly. dasti. (surya kant) judge ..... execute the development works. the development scheme of his colony must be in conformity of the development schemes of those of the neighbouring areas .(27) the 1975 act divides the development works into two parts namely, (i) external development works; and (ii) internal development works. the internal development works, as illustrated in section ..... public utilities like hospital, power station, fire station and police station etc.to discharge their obligation under the haryana development and regulation of urban areas act, 1975. these public utilities are intended to be set up for the benefit of private builders who have meanwhile taken over the empire of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2014 (HC)

Present:- Mr. R.N. Lohan Advocate Vs. Chetan Parkash and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... &m) -2- cab . and the driver had a driving licence to drive a car and not a maxi cab. the requirement of law under section 3 of the motor vehicles act is that the driver should have an effective driving licence. effective has been held by the supreme court in ashok gangadhar maratha versus oriental insurance company limited-air1999sc3181as a valid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2014 (HC)

icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sumit Kapoor and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... could not be able to controvert this argument.4. i have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file.5. section 3 of the motor vehicle act reads as under:- 3.necessity for driving licence.- (1) no person shall drive a motor vehicle in any public place unless he holds an effective driving licence issued to him .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //