Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 1 short title and commencement Court: madhya pradesh Page 2 of about 129 results (0.180 seconds)

State of M.P. Vs. Vedri

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001CriLJ189; 2001(2)MPHT69; 2000(3)MPLJ471

..... 36. in totality of the case, for the reasons discussed above, in our opinion, the appreciation of evidence by the trial court was wholly not appropriate and it has acted with material irregularity and had taken into consideration inconsequential circumstances to record acquittal of the accused.in totality of the case, therefore, the judgment of the trial court is based ..... the accused in crime no. 305/80 of p.s. civil lines, morena, under sections 399, 400 and 402, ipc and under sections 25 and 27 of the arms act. this aspect though not proved by evidence of any police officer, however, the court is bound to take judicial notice of it, goes to prove the fact that the ..... be templed to such conduct to avoid arrest. in another case of matru v. state of u.p.,reported in air 1971 sc 1050, it was observed that the act of absconding is no doubt relevant piece of evidence to be considered along with other evidence but its value would always depend on the circumstances of each case. generally the .....

Mazdoor Sangh (intuc) and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT16

..... amount of rs. 705.28 lacs an amount of rs. 17.5 lacs is the outstanding towards gratuity which carries interest under section 7(3a) under the provisions of gratuity act, 1972 for which a reliance has been placed on 2003 scc (l & s) 257 (h. ganga hanume gowda v. karnatak agro industries corporation ltd.). it was further submitted that the ..... .28 lacs to the petitioner. out of which rs. 17.5 lacs which is the amount of gratuity shall carry interest as per section 7(3a) of payment of gratuity act, 1972.(2) an amount of rs. 148 lacs being arrears of the salary of the employees for the period from january, 1999 to 15th of september, 1999 will be paid .....

Krishna Bai and anr. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : II(2002)DMC492; 2002(3)MPHT269

..... real accused.14. this court in case of ahshan khan v. state of madhya pradesh, reported in 2002 (1) crimes 117, where no proximity with any overt act showing harassment to deceased or indicating grave and serious provocation enough in taking recourse to suicide, has held that conviction under section 306, ipc, could not be sustained ..... of deceased by accused persons, no offence of cruelty is found properly proved against the appellants. in the circumstances, legal assumption under section 113a of the evidence act is not available to the prosecution.12. it seems that the deceased was dissatisfied with her marriage and out of her further disappointment with her husband as ..... 306, ipc, heavy burden lay on the prosecution to prove first the commission of offence under section 498a, ipc, then alonea presumption under section 113a of evidence act shall arise against the accused person. learned counsel for the state, on the other hand, has supported the findings of the trial court.7. i have heard .....

Uniscans and Sonics Ltd. Vs. M.P. Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)MPHT555

..... any expense incurred by him in cutting off and reconnecting the supply, are paid, but no longer.(2) where any difference or dispute which by or under this act is required to be determined by an electrical inspector, has been referred to the inspector before notice as aforesaid has been given by the licensee, the licensee shall not ..... which have been considered in the light of the material on record and the provisions of law governing the situation.5. section 2(c) of (the indian) electricity act, 1910 defines a consumer as under:'consumer' means any person who is supplied with energy by a licensee or the government or by any other person engaged in ..... a sum of rs. 9,36,617/- purporting to be towards electricity dues of sister companies.2. petitioner is a limited company duly registered under the provisions of companies act. it obtained electricity connection from respondent no. 1 and an agreement dated 17-1-1987 (annexure p-l) was duly executed between the petitioner and the electricity board. .....

Ramswaroop Tiwari Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... recorded. during investigation, vijay bahadur and chhota were arrested vide memo not ex.p/7. on the basis of memorandum of accused vijay bahadur recorded under section 27 of evidence act, a rope used in commission of offence was seized (ex.p/5). on the basis of memorandum of accused chhota recorded under section 27 of evidence ..... act, silver chain and key were also seized (ex.p/6). accused ramswaroop was arrested vide memo ex.p/11. during the 5 course of investigation, mother and father of deceased .....

Dr. Nilesh R. Doshi Vs. Dr. Smt. Gunjan Doshi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... family court, bhopal by which application of the wife/respondent no.1 has been allowed treating it to be application under section 26 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (for short, the h.m.act).2 w.p.16939/12 2. the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that maintenance amount has been granted for the son namely gaurav who .....

The State of M.P. Vs. Ratan Lal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... that the learned special judge has rightly acquitted the respondents from the charges of offence punishable under section 20(b)(1) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act. under such circumstances, there is no basis to allow the appeal filed by the state. consequently, the instant appeal is dismissed and the judgment dated 1. ..... the forensic science laboratory was not relating to the property seized from the respondents. again, if it is also considered that the provisions of section 50 of the ndps act are also violated, then the entire conduct of the excise sub inspector shri hari shastri (pw-8) comes in doubt.14. under such circumstances, the judgment ..... ?. if yes, then what would the sentence against the respondents?.9. the learned special judge considered the compliance of the provisions of section 50 of the ndps act by which an opportunity was to be given to the respondents that if they desired their search could be conducted before a magistrate or gazetted officer. it .....

Daryao Singh and ors. Vs. Smt. Halkibai and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1976MP194

..... 1968 whereby daryao singh and his two minor sons claimed specific performance of the alleged agreement dated 1-10-1964, ex. p-5, entered into by ganesh singh, purporting to act as guardian of his minor son sunder singh, and mst. mathura bai, and decreed civil suit no. 12-a of 1965 brought by barelal and ramratan declaring that they were ..... the time of execution of these documents, both daryao singh and ganesh singh considered that sunder singh and mst. mathura bai were the real owners, and that ganesh singh could act only on their behalf, and not in his own right. the alleged agreement, ex. p-5, executed by genesh singh also amounts to an admission by him that, in fact ..... also uphold the finding of the learned additional district judge that since ganesh singh was not the real owner, and inasmuch as there was no lawful authority in him to act on behalf of sunder singh and mst. mathura bai, the agreement dated 1-10-1964, ex. p-5, executed by ganesh singh on behalf of sunder singh as his .....

Premnarayan Vs. Kailashchandra and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : III(2008)BC658

..... the disputed signature with the admitted one made observations in the impugned judgment, totally disbelieved and discarded the oral evidence on record, therefore the court below acted with material irregularity and error.6. no document of the criminal case was filed by the respondent, which could have thrown light on the issues whether ..... . undoubtedly none of the parties was examine by the handwriting expert. the learned court below in exercise of powers conferred by section 73 of the evidence act tried to compare the disputed signature with the admitted signature of the appellant and held that the signature on ex. p/1 are identical with the admitted ..... of defence witness. the approach of the court below is highly prejudicial in exercising the jurisdiction vested in it by section 73. therefore, the court below acted with material irregularity and illegality'. mr. vikas rathi, learned counsel for respondent submitted that the judgment and decree passed by the learned court below is based .....

Vijay Krishna Neema Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR856]; (2005)IILLJ710MP; 2005(1)MPHT291; 2005(1)MPLJ112

..... directing the petitioner to approach under the provisions of i.d. act.11. with regard to other submissions the respondents denied that the leave applications were submitted after 2-s-86 onwards by the petitioner. the fact has ..... (ii) where there is failure of principles of natural justice; or (iii) where the orders or proceedings arc wholly without jurisdiction or the vires of an act is challenged.'10. so relying on the aforesaid judgment of the supreme court, i reject the preliminary objection of the respondents with regard to objection of alternative remedy ..... has been governed by awards, i.e., shastri award/desai award and bipartite settlements and petitioner has to exhaust all the remedies available under the industrial disputes act, 1947. when the writ petition was admitted for hearing vide order dated 25-9-98, it was mentioned that, 'the right of the counsel for respondents .....