Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 1 short title and commencement Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 2 of about 39 results (0.241 seconds)

Aug 01 2006 (TRI)

Ex-si Ajay Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2007)(1)SLJ274CAT

..... could be the basis of conviction. in other words, even in the absence of oath the evidence of a child witness can be considered under section 118 of the evidence act provided that such witness is able to understand the questions and able to give rational answers thereof". it was thus held that the evidence of a child witness and credibility ..... key was kept in the police station for safe custody vide dd no. 28-a dt. 14.4.01. mrs. meenu is still living with si ajay singh. the above act on the part of si ajay singh no. d/3628 amounts to grave misconduct and is unbecoming of a govt. servant of under section 3 of ccs (conduct) rule, rendering .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2011 (TRI)

Sh. Ravi Kumar Uppal and Others Vs. Press Council of India Through the ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... are extending cpf scheme to their employees. those organizations whose employees have switched over to the central pension scheme pattern have enabling provisions in the respective acts/rules/regulations. it is not for the tribunal to issue any direction to the respondents to follow parity with such organizations as each autonomous organization has ..... the pci and approved by the government of india under press council act is legally valid and sustainable. regulation 13 of the said regulations mandates that the employees of the council other than the employees on deputation shall be entitled ..... respondent would submit that the applicants being employees of the press council of india are governed by the conditions of service spelt out in the press council act, 1978 and press council of india (terms and conditions) regulations, 2002. his contention is that regulation 13 being part of the regulations framed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2012 (TRI)

Sunil Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through Commissioner of Police, ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... was acquitted for lack of ample evidence, his conduct shows that he has no regard for law and fearlessly indulged in a case which the society treats as a shameful act. the committee therefore did not find him fit to be appointed in delhi police and accordingly had not recommended his case. the very fact that out of 27 candidates whose ..... kidnapping and rape though he was acquitted due to lack of ample evidence but his conduct shows that he has no regard for law and fearlessly indulged in a shameful act and as such, not recommended his case for appointment to the post of c(e)m in delhi police. the action taken by the respondents is legal and justified in ..... the screening committee, as in the opinion of the said committee, the conduct of the applicant shows that he has no regard for law and fearlessly indulged in a shameful act, in view of which he was not found suitable for appointment in the disciplined force like delhi police. as per the directions issued vide phqs uo note dated 9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2007 (TRI)

insp. Ishwar Singh S/O Shri Bhim Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Though the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... security cordon, which is a gross negligence, carelessness and dereliction in discharge of official duties. applicants contention that shri sandeep jaidka did not do any act of indiscipline is far from truth and is totally baseless and unjustified. applicant is trying to shift responsibility on the shoulder of other police officers, which ..... power and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. but that finding must be based on some evidence. neither the technical rules of evidence act nor of proof of fact or evidence as defined therein, apply to disciplinary proceeding. when the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receives support therefrom, the ..... disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge. the court/tribunal in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to reappreciate the evidence and to arrive at its own independent findings on the evidence. the court/tribunal may interfere where the authority .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2008 (TRI)

Bharat Singh S.i. (Exe) S/O Late Vs. Commissioner of Police, Joint

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. the present case provides a classic example how lightly and by complete lack of application of mind, some times, the authorities entrusted with handling/dealing with enquiries against employees act, who may be visited with such punishments that may totally ruin their career.2. bharat singh, the applicant herein, faced a regular departmental enquiry on the following charge, which came ..... accused darshan kumar sharma as he returned back from abroad on 9/5/05 via i.g.i. airport with the fear of attachment of his immovable property. the above act on the part of you si bharat singh no. d-633 amounts to gross misconduct, negligence, carelessness and dereliction in the discharge of his office official duties which renders you .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2008 (TRI)

H.C. Bakshi S/O Shri Ram Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... guidelines laid down by this order are also observed by the employers in private sector. 12. these guidelines will not prejudice any rights available under the protection of human rights act, 1993. accordingly, we direct that the above guidelines and norms would be strictly observed in all work places for the preservation and enforcement of the right to gender equality of ..... 1. the applicant has claimed the following relief in the oa filed under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985: (i) declare that the constitution of the enquiry committee in the instant case is bad in law; (ii) declare that the proceedings of the enquiry committee is unsustainable in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2008 (TRI)

Smt. Sushila Bhatia W/O Late Shri Vs. Employees State Insurance

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... obligatory on the part of esi corporation to provide medical facilities. as such, his claim was rightly rejected for reimbursement as per rules. as far as section 17 (2) of esi act is concerned, it speaks about the conditions of service of esic employees at par with the central government employees in respect of recruitment, pay and allowances, conduct rules etc. the ..... , her husband died on 10.07.2006.4. it is in these circumstances applicant has filed the present o.a. on the ground that as per section 17 (2) of esi act, her husband was entitled for medical benefits and in emergency, he could go to any hospital. it is submitted by applicant that her husband had to be rushed in emergency .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2001 (TRI)

Ex. Constable Narender Kumar Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... delhi where you were detailed to undertake practice in sports in official discharge of your duties and thus guilty of grave misconduct indiscipline and dereliction of duty. the above act of you const. narinder kumar khatri, no. 7284/dap now (157/rb) amounts to grave misconduct, indiscipline, negligence, dereliction of official duties and unbecoming of ..... a police officer on your part which render you liable for punishment under 21 of d.p. act, 1978." 3. on the basis of the material produced in the departmental enquiry the enquiry officer held the applicant guilty of the charge of contracting marriage with ..... marriage with sudesh. it is further contended that in absence of any proof of solemnisation of marriage as mandated under section 7 of the hindu marriage act there is no evidence in the enquiry to substantiate the charge of contracting second marriage against the applicant and the case is of no evidence.4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2013 (TRI)

Neeraj Singh Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... proceeding only on the allegations, which constitute misconduct. a case had been instituted by the cbi under section 13(1)(d), 13(2) of prevention of corruption act, 1988 read with section 120-b ipc against the applicant and the said viren ahuja. the matter had been thoroughly inquired not only in respect of securing employment ..... secured employment on 01.07.2002, willfully concealing the fact that he had previous official dealings with one of the firms directors, shri viren ahuja. by his aforementioned act, he failed to maintain absolute integrity; devotion to duty and conducted himself in a manner which is becoming of a govt. servant thereby rule 3(i) r/w ..... an employment in m/s. r. tech system (india) pvt. ltd., with which he had official dealings, without obtaining previous sanction of the government. by his aforementioned act, he failed to maintain absolute integrity, devotion to duty and conducted himself in a manner which is unbecoming of a govt. servant thereby violated rule 3(1) r/w .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2008 (TRI)

Rajiv Tomar, Ex-constable of Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Its

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... a. industries ltd. the hon'ble supreme court application of the principles of natural justice that no man should be condemned unheard intends to prevent the authority from acting arbitrarily affecting the rights of the concerned person. no decision must be taken which will affect the right of any person without first being informed of the case ..... the matter ultimately came to be disposed of by this tribunal. while dealing with the provisions of section 19 of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, and the time lag between the involvement of the applicant in the criminal case and his selection as constable, we held as follows: 20. we are of ..... cases of theft of wrist watch. he was given in the custody of his father. there was no trial conducted against him, having been dealt under the juvenile justice act, 1986.twelve years thereafter, he successfully competed for the post of constable (exe.) male in delhi police, but before he could be appointed, pursuant to a show .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //