Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 chapter iv punishments Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 434 results (0.393 seconds)

Apr 20 2022 (SC)

Sri Anil Kumar Upadhyay Vs. The Director General Ssb

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... appeal.2. the appellant herein was serving as a head constable (ministerial) in the 15th battalion of the sashastra seema bal (ssb), bongaigaon. he was charged with violation of good order and discipline under section 43 of the shashastra seema bal act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the ssb act ), for having entered the mahila barrack of the battalion at around 00:15 hours, on the intervening ..... rank of constable and forfeiture of two years service for the purpose of promotion. she was also tried by the sfc for an offence under section 43 of the ssb act. it is submitted that therefore the learned single judge rightly interfered with the punishment of removal from service awarded by the disciplinary authority commandant holding that the same was disproportionate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 2005 (SC)

Sarbananda Sonowal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC2920; JT2005(6)SC79; (2005)5SCC665

..... the constitution, where a duty has been cast upon the union of india to protect every state against external aggression and internal disturbance. the imdt act which contravenes article 355 of the constitution is, therefore, wholly unconstitutional and must be struck down.43. shri ashok desai, learned senior counsel appearing ..... his knowledge.'in collector of customs, madras v. d. bhoormull, : 1975crilj545 , proceedings were initiated under section 167(8)(c) of the customs act for confiscation of contraband or smuggled goods and it was observed:'..............since it is exceedingly difficult, if not absolutely impossible for the prosecution to prove facts ..... that 'the government will give due consideration to certain difficulties expressed by aasu/aagsp regarding the implementation of the illegal migrants (determination by tribunals) act, 1983.' the accord further provided that foreigners who have entered into india after 25th march, 1971 will continue to be detected, their names deleted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2011 (SC)

Shri Girish Vyas and anr. Vs. the State of Maharastra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... for a garden. the plan was sanctioned in exercise of the power of the state government under section 10 of the then prevalent bombay town planning act 1954 (1954 act for short). this notification stated that the pmc had passed the necessary resolution of its intention to prepare a development plan, carried out the necessary survey ..... pmc rejected the proposal by his reply dated 6.11.1995 under section 45 of the mrtp act read with section 255 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 (bpmc act for short) and d.c. rule no. 6.7.1, since the plot had been reserved for a primary school, and hence such a permission ..... in maharashtra such as pmc (excluding some municipal corporations which have their separate enactments) and of the standing committees of the corporations are enumerated in the bpmc act. coupled with those powers, the municipal corporations have their powers under mrtp act. these are the statutory powers, and they cannot be bypassed. the responsibility of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2008 (SC)

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534

..... grant relief to persons belonging to socially oppressed castes and minorities.172. the amendment to article 15 by inserting article 15(5) and the new act (act 5 of 2007) are to be viewed in the background of these constitutional provisions. it may also be recalled that the preamble to the constitution ..... applicable to principles of reservation or other affirmative action contemplated under article 15(5) of the constitution of india 164. based on the ninety-third constitutional amendment act, act 5 of 2007 has been enacted. according to the petitioner's counsel, this is a 'suspect legislation' and therefore, it is to be subjected to ..... government or institutions maintained by or receiving aid from the central government or educational institutions set up by the central government under the societies registration act, 1860. act 5 of 2007 is not intended to provide reservation in 'private unaided' educational institutions. none of the private unaided educational institutions have filed petitions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2007 (SC)

Raja Ram Pal Vs. the Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2007(2)SC1; (2007)3SCC184

..... or any committee thereof involves the privileges and contempt proceedings. the privilege implications apart, the committee is constrained to observe that such attempts and acts are basically unethical in nature. 45. the committee are, therefore, deeply distressed over acceptance of money by members for raising parliamentary questions in the ..... be taken which would result in absence of representation of such constituency in the house. such interpretation would make statutory provisions (the representation of the people act, 1951) as also constitutional scheme (articles 84, 102, 190, 191, 192, tenth schedule, etc.) non-workable, nugatory and otiose. if a member ..... question. i. unlike british parliament, indian parliament is not sovereign. it is the constitution which is supreme and sovereign and parliament will have to act within the limitations imposed by the constitution:417. there is a marked distinction between british parliament and the indian parliament. british parliament is sovereign. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2007 (SC)

L.M.L. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC1032; 2008(56)BLJR483; 2007(14)SCALE469; (2008)3SCC128; 2008AIRSCW599; 2008(1)LH(SC)392

..... can, however, be no doubt that ordinarily the doctrine of promissory estoppel would not be applied against statute. sub-section 6 of section 24 of 1999 act inter alia empower the holder of a licence, to modify the tariff. if the implementation of tariff was dependent upon fulfillment of certain conditions precedent which in ..... the commission shall be guided by the following, namely:(a) the financial principles and their application provided in sections 46, 57 and 57a of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and in the sixth schedule thereto;(b) the factors which would encourage efficiency; economical use of the resources, good performance, optimum investments, observance of the ..... case may be. section 13 provides for formation and functions of the uttar pradesh power corporation. 25. section 24 occurring in chapter vii of the 1999 act provides for licensee's revenue and tariffs. sub-section (1) of section 24 states that the licensee shall follow the procedure prescribed in the regulations in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2007 (SC)

Lal Mohammad and ors. Vs. Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC2230; [2007(112)FLR847]; JT2007(2)SC458; 2007(2)SCALE138; (2007)2SCC513; 2007AIRSCW3901; 2007ILLJ773(SC)

..... reported in : (1990)iillj70sc where the similar question was considered by the constitution bench of this court and it was observed,thus, by this amendment act the parliament clearly provided that though such termination may not have been retrenchment technically so-called, as decided by this court, nevertheless the employees in question ..... direct basis shall be made though the employment exchange or in the manner as permitted by provisions of the employment exchange (compulsory notification of vacancies) act, 1959. rule 8.5 -all applications received against a specific notification/advertisement will be subjected to a careful scrutiny by the department concerned in the ..... w.e.f. 4 september, 1993 on tendering of salary in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation as admissible under the provisions of the industrial disputes act. these notices were served during pendency of the special leave petitions. therefore, they were not challenged by the appellants before the high court. however, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2008 (SC)

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Esi Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC1449; [2008(117)FLR1184]; JT2008(2)SC407; (2008)IILLJ302SC; (2008)4MLJ795(SC); 2008(2)SCALE454; (2008)3SCC247; 2008AIRSCW1494; 2008(3)CivilLJ659; 2008LABIC1390; 2008-II-LLJ-302; 2008(2)LH(SC)1227; 2008(3)KCCR2004

..... state insurance corporation (2000) 2 llj 593.mr. francis, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent would, however, support the impugned judgment.the act:8. the act was enacted to provide for certain benefits to the employees in cases of sickness, maternity and employment injury and to make provisions for certain other matters ..... respect of contract employees against the principal employer without looking for the immediate employer. as already stated, in an enquiry under section 45a of the esi act all that is required is the authority must give a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the employer concerned. that has been complied with by ..... impugned judgment, a division bench of the madras high court, while overruling the said decision in madras gymkhana (supra) held:the scheme of the esi act does not envisage separate and independent determination of contribution payable by the principal employer and the immediate employer in respect of employees directly employed by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2007 (SC)

Greater Bombay Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs. United Yarn Tex. Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC1584; 2007(3)ALT1(SC); [2007]137CompCas63(SC); JT2007(5)SC201; 2007(3)KLT302(SC); 2007(3)MhLj434; 2007(5)SCALE366; (2007)6SCC236; 2007AIRSCW2325; 2007(3)AIRKarR406

..... read something into the section, which the legislature had not intended. 53. finally, it could not be said that amendments in chapter v, section 56 of the rdb act by act no. 23 of 1965 inserting 'co-operative bank' in clause (cci) and 'primary co-operative bank' in clause (ccv) either expressly or by necessary intentment apply ..... conform to such co-operative principles and who can give loans to the public. he submitted that prior to the banking laws (application to co-operative societies) act, 1965 (act 23 of 1965), co-operative societies doing banking were not subject to regulation of their business of banking although deposits and working funds of co- operative banks were ..... /inserting clause (cci) in section 5. the parliament in its wisdom had not altered or modified the definition of 'banking company' in section 5(c) of the br act by act no. 23 of 1965. 21.as noticed above, 'co-operative bank' was separately defined by the newly inserted clause (cci) and 'primary co- operative bank' was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2008 (SC)

Ksl and Industries Ltd. Vs. Arihant Threads Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : IV(2008)BC421(SC); 153(2008)DLT27(SC); 2008(12)SCALE42; (2008)9SCC763

..... allahabad bank v. canara bank and anr. : [2000]2scr1102 , a similar question was raised before this court. there the court considered two acts, (i) rddb act, 1993 and companies act, 1956. it was held that even where a winding up petition was pending or a winding up order had been passed against a company for ..... criminal trespass and unlawfully entering the property, it dispossessed the receiver appointed by the tribunal; the action of taking over possession of the property by act of highhandedness could not be approved; the company also removed machinery and other movable property from the disputed premises; created unlawful tenancy rights in favour of ..... recovery appellate tribunal, delhi (`drat' for short) and held that in view of the provisions of section 22 of the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 (hereafter referred to as `sica'), no recovery proceedings could be effected against the first respondent- company in the light of the bar contained therein.factual .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //