Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 chapter iv punishments Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 16 results (0.119 seconds)

Stan Commodities Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Managing Director, Pawan Kumar ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2009Jhar14; 2008(56)BLJR2914; [2008(4)JCR162(Jhr)]

..... its discretion as to cases in which it may apply for leave and in cases where they may not apply for leave to withdraw. the remedies under npa act and drt act are complementary to each other and, therefore, the doctrine of election has no application to the present case.49. on perusal of the said decision of ..... directing the respondents-bank to consider the objection filed by the petitioner and take decision by passing a reasoned order before proceeding under section 13(4) of the said act, 2002.42. the respondents-bank in case of non-acceptance of objection/representation was duty bound to communicate the reason within one week, but the same has ..... disposed of directing the respondents-bank to consider the objection/representation filed by the petitioner and pass a reasoned order before proceeding under section 13(4) of the said act, 2002.9. the petitioner filed representation dated 14.1.05 before the respondents-bank regarding compliance of the said order of this court. it is pertinent to .....

Nand Kishore Roy Vs. Agriculture Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... facilities necessary for carrying out the purpose of this act, (m) provide for institution, maintenance and award of scholarships, fellowships, studentships, medals, prizes, etc.; (n) accept on behalf of a university trust ..... instructions, teaching and training in such branches of learning and courses of studies as determined by the academic council within the provisions of this act and for research advancement and dissemination of knowledge. (l) provide for the establishment and maintenance of colleges hostels, laboratories, experimental farms and other ..... following powers and shall perform the following duties, namely:- (a) frame, amend and repeal the statute/regulations in the manner prescribed under this act; (b) review and consider the financial requirements and estimates for a university and approve its budget; 10 (c) approve the recommendation for appointment .....

Amr Dev Prabha Through Its Power of Attorney Holder Mithilesh Kumar Si ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... the issue. the question for consideration was not whether the td passbook pledged by the fifth respondent is genuine or not. the question for consideration was whether the committee acted arbitrarily or irrationally in rejecting the said td passbook. 24. in the case of ashoka smokeless coal india (p) ltd. & others vs. union of india & ..... favour someone; or whether the process adopted or decision made is so arbitrary and irrational that the court can say: the decision is such that no responsible authority acting reasonably and in accordance with relevant law could have reached ; (ii) whether public interest is affected. if the answers are in the negative, there should ..... down. the resumption of the reverse auction after the technical snag was corrected was in accordance with the terms and conditions of the nit. therefore, the act of resumption of the reverse auction process being in conformity with the terms and conditions of the nit and being without doubt was on account of the technological .....

The State of Jharkhand Vs. Ajay Kumar Pal

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR613

..... of the accused and the chain of circumstances must be established by the prosecution.'20. it may further be quoted usefully:the provisions of section 27 of the evidence act are based on the view that if a fact is actually discovered in consequence of information given, some guarantee is afforded thereby that the information was true and consequently, ..... of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused.154. these five golden principles, if we may say so, constitute the panchsheel of the proof of a case based on ..... not to leave any reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and it must be such as to show that within all human probability the act must have been done by the accused. reference was made to (1984) 4 scc 116, as already discussed in para 25 of this judgment.their lordships further .....

Rashmi Verma and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4671

..... by the magistrate;provided that when the complaint is made in writing, the magistrate need not examine the complainant and witnesses- (a) if a public servant acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duties or a court has made the complaint; or (b) if the magistrate makes over the case for enquiry or trial ..... erroneous that the magistrate taking cognizance of an offence must necessarily have territorial jurisdiction to try the cases. but section 179 coe of criminal procedure envisages that when an act is an offence by reason of anything, which has been done and of a consequence which has ensued, the place of enquiry and trial in a court within ..... account of alleged dowry demands by the husband and his relations. there is thereafter not even a whisper of allegations about any demand of dowry or commission of any act constituting an offence much less at chennai. that being so, the logic of section 178(c) of the code relating to continuance of the offences cannot be applied .....

Jaswant Pathak and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2007(2)JCR315(Jhr)]

..... has relied upon the decisions mentioned above in this context and tried to persuade us that when specific intention to cause death is made out from the overt acts asserted against the appellants, sentences for lesser charges are sufficient. in the present facts, we find that deceased was given a single blow by appellant jaswant pathak ..... is said to be present he has not been attributed with any specific overt act. therefore, we find that the conviction of appellant arun pathak under section 302/149 of the ipc cannot be maintained. accordingly he is found not guilty and acquitted ..... the hon'ble apex court has held maximum punishment under section 326 would be sufficient. it is also submitted that appellant arun pathak has not been attributed any overt act to his credit. therefore, his conviction is not maintainable. we have gone through the evidence available on the record. though the appellant no. 3 (arun pathak) .....

Jay Ram Majhi Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... . (iii) even otherwise, the article of charges and the allegations against the petitioners does not make out a case of wilful negligence nor does it suggest that the petitioners had acted in collusion with other persons. the article of charge only makes out a case of negligence simplicitor and, as such, infliction of major punishment is grossly disproportionate to the charges ..... kundu of crime and intelligence wing. hence, they failed to stop unauthorized entry of truck bearing registration no.wb-39-9954 through mansa singh gate. this act on the part of the petitioners is an act of gross indiscipline, misconduct and dereliction towards their duty. (ii) the petitioners were given full reasonable opportunity by enquiry officer to defend their case during departmental .....

Dhananjoy Hansda Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... . (iii) even otherwise, the article of charges and the allegations against the petitioners does not make out a case of wilful negligence nor does it suggest that the petitioners had acted in collusion with other persons. the article of charge only makes out a case of negligence simplicitor and, as such, infliction of major punishment is grossly disproportionate to the charges ..... kundu of crime and intelligence wing. hence, they failed to stop unauthorized entry of truck bearing registration no.wb-39-9954 through mansa singh gate. this act on the part of the petitioners is an act of gross indiscipline, misconduct and dereliction towards their duty. (ii) the petitioners were given full reasonable opportunity by enquiry officer to defend their case during departmental .....

Hira Lal Dubey Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... . (iii) even otherwise, the article of charges and the allegations against the petitioners does not make out a case of wilful negligence nor does it suggest that the petitioners had acted in collusion with other persons. the article of charge only makes out a case of negligence simplicitor and, as such, infliction of major punishment is grossly disproportionate to the charges ..... kundu of crime and intelligence wing. hence, they failed to stop unauthorized entry of truck bearing registration no.wb-39-9954 through mansa singh gate. this act on the part of the petitioners is an act of gross indiscipline, misconduct and dereliction towards their duty. (ii) the petitioners were given full reasonable opportunity by enquiry officer to defend their case during departmental .....

Padam Kumar Jain Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... other reasons, due to the second and subsequent applications for renewal, remaining unattended at the hands of the state government. the instant amendment to the mmdr act, introduced a uniform original grant period of fifty years, for all mining leaseholders. it also excluded renewal(s), after the expiry of the original lease period ..... the issue of allocation of natural resources which have direct relevance to the grant of mineral concessions. 50 4. the present legal framework of mmdr act, 1957, does not permit the auctioning of mineral concessions. auctioning of mineral concessions would improve transparency in allocation. government would also get an increased share ..... to resolve the plight of the mining industry and pendency of the renewal application before the state government for longer periods, has enacted the amendment act., but the benefit of extension / deemed extension cannot be construed to operate automatically without lessee conforming to the terms and conditions of the lease .....