Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sarais act 1867 Court: jharkhand Page 5 of about 4,911 results (0.036 seconds)

Ms Shree Balaji Metalik Through Its Proprietor Vijay Kumar Jain Vs. Th ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... central government or a state government in this behalf by general or special order if he has reason to believe that any mineral has been raised in contravention of the provisions of the act or rules made thereunder or any document or thing in relation to such mineral is secreted in any place or vehicle, he may search for such mineral, document or thing and the provisions of section 100 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 ..... learned counsel further submits that neither under the provisions under the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act (mmdr act for short) nor under the provisions of jharkhand mineral dealer's rules, 2007 nor under the provisions of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, the assistant sub inspector of police has power to make search and seizure under the factory premises and in absence of necessary authorization to the informant ..... rule 23(b) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 authorizes a gazetted officer of the central or a state government duly authorized by the 3. ..... section 24 of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 gives power to authorized persons of entry and inspection. ..... was instituted gets diluted in view of the raid conducted by a person who was not authorized under the act and the rules, as stated above. ..... (l&c) for the respondents has submitted that the assistant sub inspector of police did have the power under the mmdr act and in terms of section 100 of the cr.p.c. .....

Ramavtar Sahu Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... pursuant to the direction of the state government and in the light of the instructions of the additional collector, ranchi as well as the land reforms deputy collector, ranchi, a proceeding under jharkhand public land encroachment act, 2000 was initiated in the court of circle officer, namkum and the encroachers were heard and finally, it was held that the land in question is gair mazurwa malik land which is a public land. ..... the learned counsel for the parties and on going through the relevant documents placed on record, it appears that the order passed by the deputy commissioner, ranchi in a proceeding under section 4(h) of the bihar land reforms act, 1950 as well as the order passed in appeal by the commissioner, south chhotanagpur and confirmation by the state government were put to challenge by one smt. ..... 3007 of 1997(r), the respondent initiated proceedings under the jharkhand public land encroachment act against the petitioners on the basis of the orders passed by the deputy commissioner annulling the settlements made by the zamindar and subsequent transfers made in relation to khata no. ..... 4 purported to be the notices under section 3 of the jharkhand public land encroachment act, 2000 (in short to be referred as the act ) by reasons of which the petitioners were asked to appear and show cause as to why the alleged encroachment over the plots in question should not be removed. .....

Prem Das Banerjee Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... pursuant to the direction of the state government and in the light of the instructions of the additional collector, ranchi as well as the land reforms deputy collector, ranchi, a proceeding under jharkhand public land encroachment act, 2000 was initiated in the court of circle officer, namkum and the encroachers were heard and finally, it was held that the land in question is gair mazurwa malik land which is a public land. ..... the learned counsel for the parties and on going through the relevant documents placed on record, it appears that the order passed by the deputy commissioner, ranchi in a proceeding under section 4(h) of the bihar land reforms act, 1950 as well as the order passed in appeal by the commissioner, south chhotanagpur and confirmation by the state government were put to challenge by one smt. ..... 3007 of 1997(r), the respondent initiated proceedings under the jharkhand public land encroachment act against the petitioners on the basis of the orders passed by the deputy commissioner annulling the settlements made by the zamindar and subsequent transfers made in relation to khata no. ..... 4 purported to be the notices under section 3 of the jharkhand public land encroachment act, 2000 (in short to be referred as the act ) by reasons of which the petitioners were asked to appear and show cause as to why the alleged encroachment over the plots in question should not be removed. .....

Bhola Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... pursuant to the direction of the state government and in the light of the instructions of the additional collector, ranchi as well as the land reforms deputy collector, ranchi, a proceeding under jharkhand public land encroachment act, 2000 was initiated in the court of circle officer, namkum and the encroachers were heard and finally, it was held that the land in question is gair mazurwa malik land which is a public land. ..... the learned counsel for the parties and on going through the relevant documents placed on record, it appears that the order passed by the deputy commissioner, ranchi in a proceeding under section 4(h) of the bihar land reforms act, 1950 as well as the order passed in appeal by the commissioner, south chhotanagpur and confirmation by the state government were put to challenge by one smt. ..... 3007 of 1997(r), the respondent initiated proceedings under the jharkhand public land encroachment act against the petitioners on the basis of the orders passed by the deputy commissioner annulling the settlements made by the zamindar and subsequent transfers made in relation to khata no. ..... 4 purported to be the notices under section 3 of the jharkhand public land encroachment act, 2000 (in short to be referred as the act ) by reasons of which the petitioners were asked to appear and show cause as to why the alleged encroachment over the plots in question should not be removed. .....

Mahanand Jha Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... pursuant to the direction of the state government and in the light of the instructions of the additional collector, ranchi as well as the land reforms deputy collector, ranchi, a proceeding under jharkhand public land encroachment act, 2000 was initiated in the court of circle officer, namkum and the encroachers were heard and finally, it was held that the land in question is gair mazurwa malik land which is a public land. ..... the learned counsel for the parties and on going through the relevant documents placed on record, it appears that the order passed by the deputy commissioner, ranchi in a proceeding under section 4(h) of the bihar land reforms act, 1950 as well as the order passed in appeal by the commissioner, south chhotanagpur and confirmation by the state government were put to challenge by one smt. ..... 3007 of 1997(r), the respondent initiated proceedings under the jharkhand public land encroachment act against the petitioners on the basis of the orders passed by the deputy commissioner annulling the settlements made by the zamindar and subsequent transfers made in relation to khata no. ..... 4 purported to be the notices under section 3 of the jharkhand public land encroachment act, 2000 (in short to be referred as the act ) by reasons of which the petitioners were asked to appear and show cause as to why the alleged encroachment over the plots in question should not be removed. .....

Rakesh Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand Through the Principal Secretary Ur ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... in the aforesaid facts, the mandatory condition that a no confidence motion against the deputy mayor/vice chairperson can be initiated only when he/she was discharging function of mayor/chairperson under section 32 of the act, is absent in the case of the petitioner, and thus, it must be held that the initiation of no confidence 13 motion, which was held on 14.03.2016, was illegal and void ab initio. ..... the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the additional collector, who was authorised by the deputy commissioner to act as the presiding officer under rule 3(8), acts as a delegatee and while so, the statutory provision which mandates that a special meeting shall be convened for discussion and voting on no confidence motion within 15 days of the receipt of the proposal does not get extended ..... reported in (2010) 1 scc 730, wherein the issue involved was, whether a statute made under the act providing benefits to the teaching staff for which assent was given by the chancellor can be enforced in the absence of publication in the official gazette and the issue was answered by the hon'ble supreme court ..... a notification was issued on 28.08.2014 whereby in exercise of powers conferred under section 590(1) r/w section 30(5) of jharkhand municipal act, 2011, by the order of the governor of jharkhand, jharkhand municipal (procedure for conduct of no confidence motion against deputy mayor/vice chairperson) rules, 2014 were notified, and made effective from the date of notification .....

Bamri Paharin Vs. Eastern Coalfield Limited Through Its Chief General ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... learned counsel for the respondents submitted that so- called third wife of deceased employee has got no legal right under the provisions of hindu marriage act, 1955 to claim for the relief. ..... accordingly, the third marriage solemnized by baga paharia with the petitioner is not a valid marriage under the provision of hindu marriage act, 1955.6. ..... thus the alleged divorce of baga paharia to his 2nd wife cannot be recognized under any customary law or under hindu marriage act.7. .....

Bishwanath Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... 963 of 1992 convicting the petitioner for the offence punishable under section 25(1-b)(a) of the arms act and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years has been affirmed. ..... investigation resulted in submission of charge-sheet under sections 25(a)/26/35 of the arms act. .....

Junior Doctor Association Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2005(1)BLJR401; [2005(1)JCR290(Jhr)]

..... under the said provisions, the central government by general or special order is required to determine the persons referred to sub-section (1) of section 72 of the act, 2000, be finally allotted to one or other successor state for service and the date with effect from which such allotment shall take effect. ..... it is informed that no final notification of allotment of doctors having been issued by the central government under section 72(2) of the act, 2000, the state of jharkhand is facing difficulty to identify the vacant posts which may be filled up by direct recruitment or from any other source.4. ..... in any case, regular appointments should be made within six months from the date of final allocation of state as may be notified by the central government under section 72(2) of the bihar re-organization act, 2000. ..... learned advocate general relied on the provisions of section 72(2) of the bihar re-organization act, 2000. .....

Jura Munda and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... the learned trial court after consideration of the grounds raised by defence counsel, did not find any serious contradiction in the prosecution story to disbelieve the act of killing by the accused appellants at around 8.30 in the night on 22nd august, 2001 by sharp cutting weapon on the neck, while the family members of the deceased namely his elder son p.w.1, p.w. ..... not find the minor inconsistencies in certain statements of the prosecution witnesses of any serious consequence when there was enough direct evidence to uphold the culpability of the accused persons of the act of murder of the informant's father. 8. .....