Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2007(1)KarLJ61; 2006(6)AIRKarR557
..... at the relevant time the 3rd respondent was only 27 years and petitioner was aged 37 years and therefore the application of the 3rd respondent should not have been considered at all, but nevertheless the same having been considered and the 3rd respondent also having been selected and appointed, the appointment is bad in law. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2007KAR4653; 2007(6)KarLJ405; 2007(4)KCCR2332; 2007(5)AIRKarR107(DB)
..... at the same time, we cannot ignore the fact that the learned single judge did not consider the question whether the appointment of sri. s.r. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2009(4)KCCR3113(D.B).
..... jointly for erecting statue of great divine poet thiruvallavur near ulooor lake, bangalore on 9th august 2009 and statue of great poet sarvajna at chennai on 13th august 2009, we do net see any irregularity or illegality in the same.5. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2007(2)Kar2260; 2007(3)KCCR1614; 2007(3)AIRKarR177;
..... udd 92 mny 2006 published in the karnataka gazette on 16.1.2007, annexure-a, issued in exercise of powers conferred by section 3 r/w clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the 'corporation act' is bad in law in view of the fact that the same is issued without referring the petitioner's objections along with the draft notification to the bangalore mahanagara palike for expressing its views thereon?b) whether section 302 of the 'panchayat act' as substituted by act no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2004KAR1299; 2004(2)KarLJ322
..... on that day, he has deposed as hereunder:'i have been a tenant in respect of the petition schedule property for the last 50 years'.on the same day in para 5 of his examination-in-chief he deposed further as hereunder:'about two months earlier to filing of this petition, p.w. ..... at no point of time has raised the question of adverse possession and for the first time in the present suit in the written statement has raised the question of adverse possession and has failed to prove the same. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [1988]68STC257(Kar)
..... 5037 of 1980 has been dismissed on the ground that the same is not tenable before this court. 2. ..... that revision petition was dismissed by the first respondent finding the same without any merit. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1999KAR1814; 1999(1)KarLJ488
..... the comparison in our opinion is fallacious for the reason that the same government prescribes standards of education, equipment, grants and facilities including the qualification of the staff for being employed in urban and rural schools imparting instructions from first to eighth standard'. ..... it was said that students taking education in common rural schools from first to eighth standard are at a comparative disadvantage to those taking education in urban schools in the same standards. ..... they are not of the same kind. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2004CriLJ1147; 2004(3)KarLJ432
..... the material on record clearly shows that the accused had been acquitted in the criminal cases and the same will have a bearing on the merits of the instant cases also. ..... the matters are remanded to the learned sessions judge with a direction to here both sides on all the grounds urged in the memorandum of appeals, excepting this aspect, and dispose of the same in accordance with law.
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2008(4)KarLJ9; ILR2008(2)Kar2457; 2008(2)KCCR1219; 2008(3)AIRKarR355; 2008LabIC(NOC)875(Kar)
..... in the light of the provisions of section 84, the communication issued by the first respondent as per annexure-m where it directs the corporation to promote the third respondent to the post of executive engineer is not sustainable as the same is without authority of law. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2003KAR1555
..... hence, the question of interfering with the same at this stage is not at all permissible.8. .....
Tag this Judgment!