Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sale of goods act 1930 section 5 contract of sale how made Sorted by: recent Court: uttaranchal Page 1 of about 1 results (0.174 seconds)

Telecommunication Consultants India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercia ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2010)29VST265(NULL)

..... to section 2(n) of the act lays down that notwithstanding anything contained in the indian sale of goods act, 1930, a sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed for the purpose of the act to have taken place in the state, wherever the contract of sale or purchase might have been made, if the goods are within the state. if construed ..... literally, this implies that goods which are the subject matter ..... india, and article 286 of the constitution of india, it emerges that sales tax is leviable even on transactions which do not fall strictly within the definition of the term 'sale', under the sales of goods act, 1954 (as amended), in view of the liberal definition of the term 'sale' in sub-clauses (a) to (f) of clause (29-a) .....

Senior Superintendent Indian Postal Department, Dehradun and Another V ...

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... refrigerated, oxidizing substances, poisonous, toxic and infectious, corrosive substances, drugs (narcotics) electronic items-television, vcrs, radios, transformers, alarm clocks etc. bulk pharmaceuticals, miscellaneous dangerous goods including magnetized materials/articles liable to damage aircraft etc.? 7. the net connector? being an electronic item, it was prohibited to be sent by speed post. if ..... incur any liability by reason of any such loss, misdelivery, delay or damage, unless he has caused the same fraudulently or by his willful act or default.? 6. in the instant case, the respondent has failed to establish that some officials of the postal department had a fraudulent or ..... 5. we considered the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the appellants. learned counsel for the appellants has referred to section 6 of the indian postal act, 1898, which reads as under:- sec-6 - exemption from liability for loss, misdelivery, delay or damage: the govt. shall not incur liability by .....

United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Harbans Singh

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... himachal pradesh issued a letter to sh. subhash kumar, ias, commissioner, garhwal mandal, pauri for deployment of trucks for transportation of apples from district shimla, himachal pradesh. the goods tax on transport vehicles entering himachal pradesh was exempted from 01.08.2003 to 31.10.2003 vide h.p. govt. notification no. exn-f(10)2/2003 dated 13 ..... shimla as per the order issued by the state government. thus, the complainant can not be said to have committed breach of the provisions of the motor vehicles act, 1988 as well as the terms and conditions of the insurance policy and the insurance company was not justified in repudiating the claim of the complainant and has ..... transport vehicle used for any other public purpose as may be prescribed by the state government in this behalf? and as per section 66(3)(n) of the motor vehicles act, 1988, the provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply to any transport vehicle used for such purposes as the central or state government may, by order, .....

Neeraj and Another Vs. State of Uttarakhand

Court : Uttaranchal

..... purchase clothes. at the time of marriage a new suit was purchased. suit was selected by neeraj (accused). shawl, bangles, feet finger rings, vermilion, bindi and other goods were also purchased by neeraj. i was with him). 15. there is yet another piece of evidence in the cross examination of p.w.1 sangeeta which also throws ..... two years and directed to pay fine of rs. 2,000/ under section under section 3(1)(xii) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act 1989. by the same judgment and order the trial court has convicted co accused/appellant munshi mewa lal under section 368 ipc and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for ..... accused neeraj (appellant) under section 363, 366 and 376 ipc, and one punishable under section 3(1)(xii) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act 1989, and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and directed to pay fine of rs.5,000/ under section 363 ipc, rigorous imprisonment for .....

M/S. New Asian Construction Company Vs. Ujvn Limited and Others

Court : Uttaranchal

..... arbitral proceedings; or (ii) for an interim measure of protection in respect of any of the following matters, namely,- (a) the preservation, interim custody or sale of any goods which are the subject-matter of the arbitration agreement; (b) securing the amount in dispute in the arbitration; (c) the detention, preservation or inspection of any ..... counsel for the parties and after perusing the material available on record, the learned district judge has observed that the petition under section 9 of the act has been moved for seeking interim injunction against the respondents to restrain them from invoking the bank guarantees, forfeiting any amount due and payable to the ..... amount to the tune of 10% of the running bills of the appellant without any prior intimation or explanation arbitrarily without any authority, which is illegal act on the part of the respondents. the appellant further alleged that contract provides for resolution of dispute through a dispute board of three members with each .....

Prashant Kumar Dabral and Others Vs. Digvijay Singh and Another

Court : Uttaranchal

..... trying to take forceful possession over the said property, therefore, the plaintiff/appellants filed o.s. no. 223 of 2011 before the court below for cancellation of sale deeds dated 6th october, 2009 and 24th may, 2010 and for restraining the defendants from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiff/appellants over the property in ..... respondent no.1. it is asserted by respondent no.1 that as per section 34 of land revenue act, 1901, mutation proceeding of the aforesaid property was carried out by the tehsildar, sadar, dehradun and since no one has objected sale of the said property, even after publication, the tehsildar ordered mutation of the property in the name ..... record and report of patwari state the possession of respondent no.2; registered sale deed is made in favour of respondent no.2 and the appellants have not produced a single document so show their possession. 12. a party may have a very good case in his favour, but that alone is not sufficient to grant injunction .....

United India Insurance Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager, Di ...

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... and the bank. the insurance company appointed piyush associates, surveyors and loss assessors. the claim of the complainant was repudiated by the insurance company on the ground that the stolen goods / items were not covered under the policy. alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties, the complainant filed a consumer complaint before the district forum, dehradun. ..... the case, as stated in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant m/s om prakash vijay kumar jain is a proprietorship concern and is carrying on the business of sale of cattle field products, ghee, oil, pulses, rice, maida, dry fruits, spices, cosmetic etc. at vikas nagar. the complainant has obtained a cash credit limit from opposite party no ..... c.c. pant, member, j. 1. this is insurers appeal under section 15 of the consumer protection act, 1986 against the order dated 14.11.2008 passed by the district forum, dehradun in consumer complaint no. 66 of 2007. by the order impugned, the district forum .....

Ramesh Chandra Mathur Vs. Sheela Devi and Others

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... the judgment being one, one appeal could have served the purpose of the appellants, yet if they have chosen to prefer two appeals it is all the more good. however, the plea of defence of the appellants against the two complainants named above is common and they may be stated hereinafter. 18. before such pleas are ..... directed to complete all the flats and hand over their possession to the aforesaid allottees within thirty days from the date of judgment, and also execute the sale deeds in accordance with the agreements. the district consumer forum had also directed that the consolidated construction company was liable to pay interest on the amounts deposited ..... issue stood closed and it is not the commissioners report that would extend some uncalled for advantage to any party. moreover, section 13 of the consumer protection act authorizes issuance of a commission and since the commissioner appointed by the district consumer forum-i, lucknow also examined the witnesses present at the site of the .....

State of U.P. (Now State of Uttarakhand) Vs. Har Gyan Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... the dead body of chandmal bhutda was lying on the first floor, and that of his wife surajmal was lying in the bath room. it was also found that the goods inside the house were scattered. on the basis of aforesaid report police registered crime no. 68/94, under sections 302/394/411/201, ipc at police station dalanwala, ..... this appeal was filed by the state before allahabad high court on 12.08.1998. the appeal is received by this court under section 35 of u.p., reorganization act, 2000 (central act 2000) for its disposal. the leave was granted and notices were sent to the respondents. respondent trilochan @ lochi is reported to have died as such appeal as ..... 3) of code of criminal procedure, 1973 (for short cr.p.c)is directed against judgment and order dated 26.02.1998, passed by additional sessions judge (e.c. act), dehradun, in sessions trial no. 79 of 1994, whereby said court has acquitted the respondents from the charge of offences punishable under section 302, 394 of indian penal code, .....

Kailash So. Anant Ram Caste Kahar, Vs. the State

Court : Uttaranchal

..... have completed supported the prosecution case. as such in view of the above discussion, the prosecution has completely proved its case against the appellant/accused u/s 25 of the act and the trial court was perfectly correct and justified in recording the conviction and sentence of the appellant as above discussed. 12. learned addl. ga also submitted that the appellant ..... prepared on the spot, i.e. ex.ka-1. the i.o. also obtained the sanction from the d.m. nainital dated 19.9.1990 u/s 25 of the act which is perfectly valid as per law. the above said evidence also gets full support from the prosecution evidence i.e. of pw1 constable radhey lal and pw2 constable shyam ..... criminal case no.1328/99 (case crime no.190/90), state. v. kailash, thereby convicting and sentencing the appellant/accused u/s 25 of the indian arms act, 1959 {hereinafter to be referred as the act} for six months s.i. with fine of rs.250/- and in case of default one months further imprisonment was awarded. 2. i have heard .....