Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sale of goods act 1930 section 5 contract of sale how made Sorted by: recent Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 14 results (0.180 seconds)

Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Pamwi Ti ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2008]82SCL137(HP)

..... act are applicable. section 5 of the act, speaks of the manner of contract of sale. as per this provision, a contract is made by an offer to buy ..... or sell goods for a price and the acceptance of such offer. the provision ..... no. 2 had caused breach of the agreement for the sale of shares, inasmuch as it did not buy the entire quantity (numerical) of shares.14. it may not be out of place to point out that shares are 'goods' within the meaning of sub-section (7) of section 2, of the sale of goods act, 1930, and therefore all the provisions of this .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Amar Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : III(2004)ACC52,2005ACJ1233

..... in sumathy v. raghavan, 1997 acj 260 (kerala), it has been held by a division bench of kerala high court that if the sale of vehicle is complete according to the provisions of sale of goods act, 1930, the transferee becomes the owner of the vehicle, even if there is no mutation in the registration certificate in favour of the transferee ..... owner of the vehicle.11. there is no merit in the contention raised on behalf of respondent no. 1. the vehicle being a movable property, its sale would be governed by the provisions of the sale of goods act, 1930. section 19 thereof provides:'19. property passes when intended to pass.--(1) where there is a contract for the ..... sale of specific or ascertained goods the property in them is transferred to the buyer at such time as the parties to the contract intend it to be transferred.(2) .....

Bala Dat Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960HP30

..... taken place thereafter. the aforesaid liability was in the nature of damages as contemplated by sub-section (2) of section 54 of the sale of goods act, 1930. that sub-section runs as below:'where the goods are of a perishable nature, or where the unpaid seller who has exercised his right of lien or stoppage in transit gives notice to ..... himachal pradesh administration, and in that case the lot or lots of the successful bidder will be re-sold at the risk and cost, through re-sale. the successful bidder will make good the loss, if any, to himachal pradesh administration through resale, failing which the same will be recovered from him as an arrear of land revenue, ..... under section 82 of the indian forest act, 1927. the successful bidder shall not be entitled to gain, if any, as a result of the re-sale.' clause xi. 'this auction sale of .....

The Hamirpur Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. and Another Vs. G ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

..... his place, the present incumbent who took over the charge approached the registrar of cooperative societies to accord approval for the execution of the sale deed and since the registrar took a good deal of time, sale deed could not be executed, pursuant to the order dated 03.08.2010, as also the impugned order, within the stipulated period. ..... filed. that petition has been allowed, vide impugned order, which is dated 23.01.2014. a direction is given to opposite party no.1 to execute the sale deed within thirty days, failing which the liquidator of opposite party no.1, has been ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and to ..... towards the cost of construction of flat, possession of the flat was not delivered to him. he, therefore, filed a complaint, under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986, seeking a direction to opposite party no.1 to allot the flat. managing director, himachal pradesh state cooperative housing federation ltd., appellant in f.a. no.90 .....

Sunil Vs. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. and Another

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

..... the time, when accident took place, held a licence to drive a light motor vehicle and that the endorsement authorizing the holder of the licence to drive heavy goods vehicle, having expired on 16.08.2008, and the vehicle, in question, being a transport vehicle, the licence was not valid and effective. appellant, therefore, ..... of learned district consumer disputes redressal forum, shimla, whereby appellants complaint, under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986, which he filed against the respondents, has been dismissed, with the finding that the insured vehicle was a goods carriage, i.e. to say, a transport vehicle, while the person, who was driving the said vehicle, ..... :- (2) a driving licence issued or renewed under this act shall,- (a) in the case of a licence to drive a transport vehicle, be effective for a period of three years: [provided that in the case of licence to drive a transport vehicle carrying goods of dangerous or hazardous nature be effective for a period of .....

M/S. Satluj Motors Vs. M/S. Ess Kay Woolen Industry and Another

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

..... reason for not accepting this plea is that in the insurance papers, value of the car is written as rs.1,39,286/- only. 8. however, we do find a good deal of force in the appellants plea that old scooter of the respondent/complainant was evaluated at rs.24,000/- and not at rs.27,000/-, as claimed by the ..... /complainant, it would not have paid an extra amount of rs.1,000/-. 9. above stated position apart, the very fact that the appellant was not issued certificate of sale at the time of delivery of vehicle on 13.04.2012, also shows that some amount of money remained unpaid by the respondent/complainant. thus, his plea that old scooter ..... pages-41 to 43. notice was sent by registered post, but papers were not supplied. therefore, the respondent/ complainant filed a complaint, under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986, seeking a direction to the appellant to deliver relevant documents, to unable it get the vehicle registered and also claimed damages to the tune of rs.25,000/- in .....

Mithun Chauhan Vs. the New India Assurance Company Limited

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

..... not possess a valid and effective driving licence, inasmuch as there was no endorsement on the licence for driving a transport vehicle. 2. appellant owned a truck (heavy goods vehicle), which was insured with the respondent in the sum of rs.4,15,000/- for the period from 07.08.2009 to 06.08.2010. on 11 ..... place and those persons were gratuitous passenger. 3. appellant felt aggrieved by the repudiation of his claim and filed a complaint, under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986. direction was sought to the respondent to pay insurance money, with interest and also to pay compensation and litigation expenses. 4. respondent contested the complaint and ..... the holder to drive a transport vehicle, in accordance with section 14 (2) (a) of the motor vehicles act, 1988. 13. since, the holder was authorised to drive heavy motor vehicles, which can be said to include both, goods carriage and passenger carrying vehicles, he was authorised to drive the vehicle, in question. 14. next ground of .....

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Ritu Upadhaya and Others

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... or (b) if it is a public service vehicle, engaged as a conductor of the vehicle or in examining tickets on the vehicle or (c) if it is a goods carriage, being carried in the vehicle, or (ii) to cover any contractual liability. explanation. - for the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the death of ..... package policy? covers the liability, there cannot be any dispute in that regard. we may hasten to clarify that the earlier pronouncements were rendered in respect of the act policy? which admittedly cannot cover a third party risk of an occupant in a car. but, if the policy is a comprehensive/package policy?, the liability would be ..... the liability. 14. i have gone through the insurance policy which, on the face of it is a comprehensive policy?, is an eye opener for the appellant. the act policy? and comprehensive policy?/ package policy? are two different policies. 15. admittedly, the deceased was occupant of the offending vehicle. the question is whether comprehensive policy? .....

Maharaja Lakshman Sen Memorial College and Others Vs. State of H.P. an ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... doing the thing ordained by the statute otherwise than in accordance therewith. this decision would have been of some use if we were to hold that the act of 1994 governs the subject of grant-in-aid and including the matters pertaining to its distribution, eligibility and qualifications therefor. 39. the argument of the ..... colleges sans any grant-in-aid also cannot be the basis to absolve the management from complying with the service conditions of its employees specified by the act and rules and ordinances issued by the university. compliance thereof is a condition precedent for continuation of affiliation of the colleges irrespective of college receives grant- ..... and for direction to the respondents to implement the judgment of the honble court as well as the provisions of himachal pradesh aided colleges (security of employees) act, 1994 in its letter and spirit, thereby directing the state government to provide 95% grant-in-aid to colleges of the petitioner-association with respect to salary .....

Suboth Sharoti Vs. State of H.P. Through Principal Secretary (Transpor ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... so varied or extended or any part thereof. the regional transport authority has over looked the letter and spirit of sub-section (3) of section 80 of the act while modifying the route permit of respondent no.4. the regional transport authority while doing so has changed the termini from pathankot - kahanphatt via nagrota bagwan to pathankot- ..... and others, 1 (2003) acc 394 (db) has explained the terms variation, extension and curtailment occurring under sub section (3) of section (8) of the motor vehicle act, 1988 as under: 15. sub-section (3) of section 80 refers to applications to vary the conditions of a stage carriage permit by increasing the number of trips or ..... driver for hire or reward at separate fares paid by or for individual passengers, either for the whole journey or for stages of the journey. 7. section 72 of the act provides for grant of stage carriage permit. section 80 lays down the procedure in applying for and granting permits. subsection (3) of section (80) reads thus: (3 .....