Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sale of goods act 1930 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Page 11 of about 596 results (0.078 seconds)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gangavarapur Padmawati and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996ACJ45

..... insured is compulsorily liable to take out an insurance policy against any liability in respect of the death of or bodily injury to the owner of the goods travelling in the lorry. hence under an 'act policy' the insurer is liable to indemnify in regard to such a liability.22. the andhra pradesh high court in yet another decision, oriental fire ..... to put his employees on board for loading, unloading or to keep them safe. thus, in respect of the employees of the owner of the goods or of the hirer, the insurance company is liable under the act policy. 23. andhra pradesh high court, thus, also relied on the division bench judgment of this court in nasibdar's case, 1983 acj ..... hire or reward and includes a motor cab, contract carriage and stage carriage. 'transport vehicle' under section 2(33) of the act of 1939 means a public service vehicle or a goods vehicle.10. section 42(1) of the act of 1939 makes a provision that no owner of a transport vehicle shall use or permit the use of the vehicle in .....

In Re: Seqonds and Powls Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... to bring home a charge of unfair trade practice it is necessary to show that the erring trader has, for the purpose of promoting the sale of his goods, adopted any unfair method or unfair or deceptive practice including the practice of making a statement whether orally or in writing or by visible representation ..... of unfair trade practices relating to the period prior to august 1, 1984, cannot be examined by the commission under the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act as the provisions relating to unfair trade practices are not retrospective in operation. unfair trade practices are in the nature of economic offences and the provisions ..... had clearly indulged in unfair trade practices attracting the provision's of section 36a(1)(i), (vii) and (viii) of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 2. the commission ordered a preliminary investigation which confirmed the allegations made by the complainant. as a result, the director (research) who had conducted the investigation .....

Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. and anr.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1994)81CompCas784NULL

..... any policies which have the effect of preventing, restricting or lessening of competition, which is prejudicial to consumer interest ; (b) continue to manufacture and promote sales of all major brands of soaps (accounting for 90 per cent. of turnover) formerly manu- factured by tomco before the proposed merger, and to the extent ..... before the submission of the present complaint. (c) with the deletion of sections 20 to 26 of chapter iii and the consequential amendments inserted in the act under act no. 58 of 1991, effective from september 27, 1991, the commission ceased to have the power to review proposed mergers, amalgamations, takeovers and expansion of ..... respondents before the bombay high court) null and void.14. the interim injunction prayed for under section 12a of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act is that the respondents be restrained from putting into practice the impugned agreement. the agreement impugned in these proceedings by the complainants is the proposed scheme .....

Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1995(75)ELT472(All)

..... realm of question of fact, which we feel, could not appropriately be examined in proceedings under article 226 of the constitution. the further question whether kwath as excisable goods is exempt under sub-heading 3003.30 under the aforesaid notification, is again a question, which it would be appropriate that the petitioner may raise all these grounds before ..... the said authority in response to the show cause notice, which shall decide it in accordance with the act and rules.6. learned counsel for the petitioner then urged, since the seizure has been made in january, 1994 and the matter is pending since long he ..... any action in pursuance of the same.3. the impugned show cause notice is issued under section 11a of the central excises and salt act, 1944 read with the provisions of the central excise tariff act, 1985, by virtue of which the petitioner has been asked to pay excise duty amounting to rs. 53,79,299/- under the .....

M/s. Nagpur Cable Operators' Association Vs. Commissioner of Police, N ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1996Bom180; 1995(2)MhLj753

..... the high court in exercise of its jurisdiction under art. 226 where the aggrieved party seeks relief against infringement of civil rights by authorities purporting to act in exercise of the powers conferred upon them by revenue statutes. the preliminary objection raised by counsel for the assesses must, therefore, fail.' 20. ..... , : [1965]57itr149(sc) . the apex court observed thus:--'.....the expression 'civil proceedings' is not defined in the constitution, nor in the general clauses act. the expression in our judgment covers all proceedings in which aparty asserts the existence of a civil right conferred by the civil law or by statute, and ..... 'civil proceedings' or 'criminal proceedings' are not defined anywhere. the constitution ofindia does not define the expression, 'civil proceeding' nor does the general clauses act. the two proceedings are entirely different and distinct, though at times it may overlap to some extent. but the distinction between the civil proceedings and criminal .....

Arun Manikchand Shah and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1996Kant386

..... provisions have been made for levy of entry tax on motor vehicles. though s. 3 is the general charging section under the act providing for levy of tax on entry of goods, specified in the first schedule, for consumption, use or sale in any local area, section 4b starts with non absence clause, sub-section (1) whereof reads as under :. 'notwithstanding anything contained ..... reads the definition of 'dealer', as'set out in clause 1 (k) of section 2 of the karnataka sales tax act, 1957. there the 'dealer' has been defined inter alia to mean a person who carries on business of buying, selling, supply-ing or distributing goods, directly or otherwise, and includes commission agents, millers and manufacturers. if the definition of the word 'dealer .....

Arun Manikchand Shah and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR3080; 1996(41)KarLJ137

..... provisions have been made for levy of entry tax on motor vehicles. though section 3 is the general charging section under the act providing for levy of tax on entry of goods, specified in the first schedule, for consumption, use or sale in any local area, section 4b starts with non obstante clause, sub-section (1) whereof reads as under : 'notwithstanding anything contained ..... reads the definition of 'dealer' as set out in clause (1)(k) of section 2 of the karnataka sales tax act, 1957. there the 'dealer' has been defined, inter alia, to mean a person who carries on business of buying, selling, supplying or distributing goods, directly or otherwise, and includes commission agents, millers and manufacturers. if the definition of the word 'dealer' as .....

Maniram and ors. Vs. Mst. Fuleshwar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ764

..... & sons v. commissioner of income tax, punjab, air 1956 sc 367, sheodan singh v. daryao kunwar, air 1966 sc 1332, laxmiratan engineering works ltd. v. assistant commissioner, sales tax, air 1968 sc 488, gojer brothers ltd. v. shri ratanlal singh, air 1974 sc 1380 and rani choudhary v. lt. col. suraj jit choudhary, air 1982 sc ..... of the instant case, the court below committed jurisdictional error by not exercising its jurisdiction under section 5 of the limitation act, thereby condoning two days' delay in filing the appeal before it, notwithstanding, good and sufficient cause for condoning the same has been made out?'at the time of hearing of the second appeal, a ..... was dismissed by the first appellate court.5. it has been contended by the learned counsel for the appellants that the application under section 5 of the limitation act was an integral part of the appeal and, therefore, even if the said application was disallowed and consequently appeal dismissed as barred by limitation, it would .....

The Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(4)ALT502; (1997)ILLJ1192AP

..... therefore, the same procedure should be followed to find out a prima facie evidence of guilt before launching criminal proceedings. therefore it is an aspect of good administration to hold preliminary enquiry to satisfy itself whether there is a prima facie case to proceed against, the delinquent, before it launches departmental enquiry. but ..... administrative action is proposed it is well settled principle of the indian administrative law that quasi-judicial body or a body which is required to act judicially should act according to the principles of natural justice. nemo judex in re sua, i.e., the authority deciding the matter should be free from bias ..... , this is not an indispensable requirement. 10. preliminary enquiry is neither a judicial nor a quasi-judicial act; it is purely an administrative action. the purpose of holding departmental enquiry is to decide whether the disciplinary action should or should not be taken against .....

R. Karuppan Vs. R. Namachivayam

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(99)ELT214(Mad)

..... the central government, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the customs act, 1962, exempts the goods of the description specified in column 2 of the table annexed to the general exemption no. 38, and falling ..... copies of tr/bank receipt/demand draft. 2. certified photocopy of proforma invoice from foreign supplier showing cif value, etc., of the goods. 3. certified photocopy of registration certificate issued by concerned authority. 4. copy of recommendation of recommending authority, if any. 5. ..... bava : 1973ecr18(sc) ; k. s. papanna v. deputy commercial tax officer 19 stc 506; beharilal shyamsunder v. sales tax officer 17 stc 508; collector of customs v. k. ganga shetty : [1963]2scr277 ; s. r. tewari v. the district board, agra : ..... (1964)illj1sc ; sales tax officer v. m/s. shiv ratan g. rohatta : [1965]3scr71 ; l. hirday narain v. income tax officer, bareilly : .....