Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sale of goods act 1930 chapter i preliminary Court: karnataka Page 24 of about 265 results (0.094 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sangameshwara Coffee Estates Ltd., Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Y N Padmanabha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Muthappa B K Vs. The Revenue Inspector

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Lakkamma Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Suryanarayana Vs. State Of Karntaka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Ramappa Godnar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Seethavva Vs. The Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Manjunath S K Vs. The Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Purushothama Bharathi Peetadhipathi Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Sridhar Naidu Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //