Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: salary allowances and pension of members of parliament amendment act 2001 section 4 amendment of section 8a Court: orissa

Jul 31 2007 (HC)

Justice Debendra Mohan Patnaik Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2008Ori28

..... by the chief justice or his nominee authorized by him to make rules; the approval of the government is necessary only if the rules relate to salaries, allowances, leave or pension. this provision also shows that officers and servants of the high court are also under the exclusive control of the chief justice and not the government ..... that the legislature should not be in a position to affect the independence of the high court judiciary by exercising pressure through refusal to vote the salary and other allowances. similarly, the pension payable to a high court judge is charged on the consolidated fund of india under article 112, clause (3)(d)(iii) so that under ..... the whole-time president of the state commission, the petitioner was paid salary of a high court judge, i.e. rs. 26,000/- per month with admissible dearness allowance and other allowances after deducting the pension amount, i.e. rs. 12,724/-, therefrom. the annual pension of the petitioner was fixed at rs. 1,52,696/- considering his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 1994 (HC)

Janaki Ballav Patnaik Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1110

..... fact that the wife of the accused had received a substantial sum of money as a member of parliament during the check period under the provisions of the salaries, allowances and pension of members of parliament act, 1954, as well as the rules framed thereunder, yet, it purposely did not try to find out the same just to ..... late as on 27th of january, 1994, a letter has been written to the lok sabha secretariat requiring the detailed information with regard to the facility allowances, constituency allowances and office expenses allowances paid to smt. jayanti patnaik, for the purpose of proving the same during the trial. it is to be noticed at this stage that the ..... of smt. jayanti patnaik, the wife of the accused-petitioner, which she received as a member of parliament under the provisions of the members of parliament (constituency allowance) rules, 1986, particularly when the aforesaid amount as per the certificate produced from the lok sabha secretariat by the accused is rs. 8,36,682.50 out .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //