Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: richardson and cruddas limited acquisition and transfer of undertaking act 1972 chapter i consitution of a tribunal Page 1 of about 7 results (0.228 seconds)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Richardson and Cruddas Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1993]202ITR350(Cal)

..... in the manufacture and production of various engineering equipment of national importance. it went into bad ways and, therefore, the government of india decided to acquire its undertaking by the richardson and cruddas limited (acquisition and transfer of undertaking) act, 1972, the relevant terms whereof are mentioned in paragraph 1 of the order of the tribunal. the custodian, on behalf of the assessee ..... .' 6. we are of the view that the tribunal has taken a correct view of the matter. the custodian was appointed by the central government under the provisions of the richardson and cruddas ltd. (acquisition and transfer of undertaking) act, 1972. under that act, the undertaking of the old company vested in the central government on the appointed day. the custodian was .....

Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited and anr. Vs. Brojo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC1571; (1986)3CompLJ1(SC); 1986LabIC1312; (1986)IILLJ171SC; 1986(1)SCALE799; (1986)3SCC156; [1986]2SCR278; 1986(2)SLJ320(SC)

..... c. 484'public policy is always an unsafe and treacherous ground for legal decision.' that was in the year 1902. seventy-eight years earlier, burrough, j., in richardson v. mellish 1824 (2) bing. 229; (s.c.) 130 e.r. 294 and 1824 all e.r. rep 258, described public policy as 'a ..... public sector. the corporation itself has considered that it is a government of india undertaking. the complete heading of the said rules is 'central inland water transport corporation limited (a government of india undertaking) - service, discipline & appeal rules - 1979. 64. in the face of so much evidence it is ridiculous to describe ..... sukhdev singh and ors. v. bhagatram sardar singh raghuvanshi and anr. : (1975)illj399sc , 'the governing power wherever located must be subject to the fundamental constitutional limitations'. the privileges and immunities of these bodies, therefore, are subject to fundamental rights and exercisable in accordance with and in furtherance of the directive principles of state policy. .....

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... decision-making' by d.y. chandrachud. but of late, there has been a slight regression in this dynamic approach. see united states v. william b. richardson (1974) 418 us 166 and warth v. seldin (1974) 422 us 490, where the supreme court of united states seems to have recoiled a little ..... secrets and official documents derived from american decisions on the question of privilege thus:the privilege, when recognized, should therefore be subjected to the following limitation:(1) any executive or administrative regulation purporting in general terms to authorize refusal to disclose official records in a particular department when duly requested as ..... by the highest judicial personages both in england and the united states:.conclusion: the privilege, when recognised, should therefore be subjected to the following limitation:(1) any executive or administration regulation purporting in general terms to authorise refusal to disclose official records in a particular department when duly requested as .....

M/S. Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... effect that the petitioner should manufacture, supply and then erect a product, namely, the lift. apart from setting up of a sugar plant in richardson cruddas (supra), the parties also agreed for supply of fabrication and installation of bottle cooling equipment at the premises of the customer. while describing the said ..... the ones which have been relied upon, namely, m/s. patnaik and company (supra), hindustan aeronautics ltd. (supra), the central india machinery manufacturing company limited (supra) still hold good. consequently the ultimate conclusion is that the present contract between the petitioner and its purchaser is one for sale and not works contract ..... .124. mr. dwivedi, learned senior counsel also placed reliance upon the three judge bench decision of this court in the central india machinery manufacturing company limited (supra). an identical question has arisen for our consideration, namely, whether manufacture and supply of wagons by way of a contract between union of india .....

Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , this court discussed the concept of vesting in the context of section 220 of the bombay municipal corporation act. it has referred to various decisions including that of richardson v. robertson, (1862) 6 lt75thus: 8. it is no doubt true that section 220 provides that any drain which vests in the corporation is a municipal ..... from the context in which it is used. it does not necessarily mean absolute vesting in every situation and is capable of bearing the meaning of a limited vesting, being limited, in title as well as duration. thus, the word 166 2011 (12) scc695226 "vest" clothes varied colours from the context and situation in which ..... result in litigation of enormous proportions; besides, the landowners can well argue that the property (i.e. the amounts) legally belonged to them and that the limitation for claiming it back would have expired. several other potential defences would be available, each of which would result in multifarious litigation. therefore, the contention is ex .....

United States Vs. Sioux Nation of Indians

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 957 (1935); delaware tribe v. united states, 74 ct.cl. 368 (1932); carrett v. united states, 70 ct.cl. 304, 310-312 (1930) in richardson, the court of claims observed: "the power of congress by special act to waive any defense, either legal or equitable, which the government may have to a suit ..... (1944). there, congress had enacted special legislation conferring jurisdiction upon the court of page 448 u. s. 400 claims, "notwithstanding any prior determination, any statute of limitations, release, or prior acceptance of partial allowance, to hear, determine, and render judgment upon" certain claims against the united states arising out of a construction contract. ..... of claims. at oral argument in this court, counsel for the united states, upon explicit questioning, advanced the position that the amendment was not beyond the limits of legislative power. [ footnote 22 ] the question whether the amendment page 448 u. s. 393 impermissibly interfered with judicial power was debated, however, in .....

San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. Vs. Rodriguez

Court : US Supreme Court

..... certain racial and ethnic groups have frequently been recognized as "discrete and insular minorities" who are relatively powerless to protect their interests in the political process. see graham v. richardson, 403 u.s. at 403 u. s. 372 ; cf. united states v. carolene products co., 304 u. s. 144 , 304 u. s. 152 -153 ..... discrimination resulting from the distribution of taxable local district wealth which has heretofore prevented many districts from truly exercising local fiscal control. furthermore, the limited holding of the district court presents none of the problems of judicial management which would exist if the federal courts were to attempt to ensure ..... , of course, play no role in the adjudication of the constitutional issues presented here. but they serve to highlight the wisdom of the traditional limitations on this court's function. the consideration and initiation of fundamental reforms with respect to state taxation and education are matters reserved for the legislative processes .....