Representative - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: representative Court: us supreme court Year: 1932 Page 1 of about 52 results (0.037 seconds)Smiley Vs. Holm
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Apr-11-1932
..... follows sec 3 that in each state entitled under this apportionment to more than one representative the representatives to the sixty third and each subsequent congress shall be elected by districts composed ..... law until such state shall be redistricted as herein prescribed sec 5 that candidates for representative or representatives to be elected at large in any state shall be nominated in the same .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWood Vs. Broom
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Oct-18-1932
..... sec 3 that in each state entitled under this apportionment to more than one representative the representatives to the sixty third and each subsequent congress shall be elected by districts composed ..... apportioned that number among the several states its second section related to the allotment of representatives to the territories of arizona and new mexico the third and fourth sections expressly .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPowell Vs. Alabama
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Nov-07-1932
..... members of the bar for the limited purpose of arraigning the defendants whether they would represent the defendants thereafter if no counsel appeared in their behalf was a matter of ..... trial chief justice anderson after disclaiming any intention to criticize harshly counsel who attempted to represent defendants at the trials said the record indicates that the appearance was rather pro forma .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCortes Vs. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Dec-05-1932
..... such injury it gives a cause of action to his personal representative we are to determine whether death resulting from the negligent omission ..... seaman may indeed have had such a remedy but his personal representative had none if the wrong resulted in his death while ..... probably disclaim there was to be a remedy for the personal representative if the seaman was killed by the negligent omission to place .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNixon Vs. Condon
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : May-02-1932
..... respective political party and this is also true as to defendants they acting only as representatives of such political party viz the democratic party in connection with the holding of a ..... charters or general enactments the state acts through duly qualified officers and not through the representatives of mere voluntary associations such authority as the state of texas has to legislate concerning .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBradford Electric Light Co., Inc. Vs. Clapper
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : May-16-1932
..... other rights and remedies of the employee or his personal representative if the accident page 286 u s 154 had happened ..... act of vermont the federal constitution prevents the employee or his representative from asserting in new hampshire rights which would be denied ..... all other rights and remedies of such employee his personal representatives dependents or next of kin at common law or otherwise .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpencer Kellogg and Sons, Inc. Vs. Hicks
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Apr-11-1932
..... 253 u s 149 washington v dawson supra none of the employees or the personal representatives here concerned could have proceeded in admiralty to enforce the workmen s compensation law of ..... denying awards according to the rules recognized in admiralty to the surviving employees and personal representatives of deceased employees of kellogg sons and remitting them to their remedy under the new .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCarroll Vs. Becker
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Apr-11-1932
..... c 28 22 46 stat 21 26 is entitled to thirteen representatives in place of sixteen as theretofore the petitioner brought this ..... a declaration of the petitioner s candidacy for the office of representative in congress in one of the congressional districts alleged to have ..... been created by a bill passed by the house of representatives and the senate of missouri in april 1931 an alternative writ .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEdwards Vs. United States
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : May-31-1932
..... as follows every bill which shall have passed the house of representatives and the senate shall before it become a law be presented ..... was not left unchallenged the judiciary committee of the house of representatives made a unanimous report in response to a resolution of the ..... the reenrollment of the bill was passed by the house of representatives but not by the senate id footnote 7 the statement has .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWyoming Vs. Colorado
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : May-31-1932
..... citizens to divert water from an interstate stream private appropriators are represented by their respective states and need not be made parties ..... because the claimants were not parties to the suit or represented therein in this the nature of the suit is misconceived ..... that the water claimants in colorado and those in wyoming were represented by their respective states and are bound by the decree .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT