Skip to content


Representative - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: representative Court: supreme court of india Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 200 results (0.027 seconds)
Feb 16 1972 (SC)

Cheriyan Joseph Poppallil and ors. Vs. Geevarghese Philip (Dead) by Hi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-16-1972

Reported in : AIR1974SC2183; (1973)3SCC612; 1972(4)LC781(SC)

..... of as compromised on the following terms 1 the legal representatives of the deceased first defendant will redeposit in the trial ..... addition to the amounts mentioned in the above clauses the legal representatives of deceased first defendant as well as the 4th defendant ..... to the amounts mentioned in the above clauses the legal representatives of deceased first defendant as well as the 4th defendant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1972 (SC)

Ramagya Prasad Gupta and ors. and Braham Prasad Gupta and ors. Vs. Shr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-1972

Reported in : (1972)1CTR(SC)161

..... is plain it is that in the absence of the legal representatives of the deceased respondents the appellate court cannot determine anything ..... died during the pendency of the appeals and his legal representatives were not brought on record within the period of limitation ..... devi as party respondents saroj devi died and the legal representatives were not brought on record within the period of limitation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 06 1972 (SC)

Umakant Vishnu Junnarkar Vs. Smt. Pramilabai and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-06-1972

Reported in : AIR1973SC218; (1973)1SCC152; 1973(5)LC437(SC)

..... act such publication shah be deemed to apply to the executor administrator or other legal representatives and the prescribed authority may proceed to determine the ceiling area applicable to the ..... ceiling area applicable to the deceased person as if such executor administrator or other legal representatives were the tenureholders 105d f the principle applicable to the determination of the surplus .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 1972 (SC)

Zila Parishad, Bhandara Vs. Agricultural Produce Market Committee and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-30-1972

Reported in : AIR1973SC848; (1973)3SCC748; 1972(4)LC771(SC)

..... of delay in bringing on record the heirs and legal representatives of a deceased party within the period prescribed in the ..... 2000 and the application for bringing their legal heirs and representatives on record filed only in december 2006 alleging that they ..... of 2381 days and 2601 days in bringing legal heirs and representatives on record does not call for exercise of discretionary jurisdiction .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 1972 (SC)

Hiralal JaIn Vs. Delhi Administration

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-01-1972

Reported in : AIR1972SC2598; 1973CriLJ47; (1973)75PLR121; (1973)3SCC398

..... it cannot be said that a detenu has the right of being represented by a legal practitioner in the proceedings before the advisory board 570 ..... telegram stated in clear terms that he was an advocate and was representing the detenu he had not stated that he was a friend or ..... be denial of the common law right of the detenu to be represented by an agent 577 a c francis coralie mullin v the administrator .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 1972 (SC)

Dr. Govinddas and anr. Vs. Shrimati Shantibai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-21-1972

Reported in : AIR1972SC1520; (1972)74PLR227; (1973)3SCC418; 1972(4)LC543(SC)

..... the said papers and the particulars of the alleged fraud the representatives of the company met the chief controller as also the ..... furnished nor was inspection allowed but the chief controller told the representatives that the issue of the licences had not been authorised ..... by the joint controller were not genuine but the said representatives instead of denying the fraud alleged ascribed it to some .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 24 1972 (SC)

Mulkh Raj Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-24-1972

Reported in : AIR1972SC1197; 1972CriLJ754; (1972)3SCC839

..... make a valid pledge of them by transferring the railway receipt representing the said goods to the general rule expressed by the ..... dissenting there was no valid pledge of the consignments of goods represented by the railway receipt in favour of the bank and the ..... and consequently the owner of the goods cannot pledge the goods represented by a railway receipt by endorsing the railway receipt unless the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 1972 (SC)

Madan Mohan Mondal Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-02-1972

Reported in : AIR1972SC2400; (1972)2SCC534; [1973]1SCR761; 1973(5)LC335(SC)

..... object of s 56 was to prevent the anomaly of the same person representing two conflicting interests and to safeguard the interests of the wards placed under ..... the court of wards shall appoint for each such ward a representative to conduct or defend the case on behalf of the ward whom ..... he represented was clearly direct and the failure of the court of wards .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 31 1972 (SC)

Debendra Nath Goswami Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-31-1972

Reported in : AIR1973SC757; 1973CriLJ596; (1973)3SCC901

..... was a partner of the assaw firm in his individual capacity and not as a representative of the ferozepom am and that the effect of his agreement to share his profits ..... 1 whether g was a partner of the assessee firm in his individual capacity or representing the partners of the ferozepore firm and ii whether the ferozepore firm was a sub .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1972 (SC)

Nadar Chandra Karar Alias Nade Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-1972

Reported in : AIR1972SC1871; (1972)2SCC540; 1973(5)LC84(SC)

..... settlement properly construed left no manner of doubt that it was for valid consideration and represented the common intention of the parties to substitute it for the earlier contracts between them .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //