Court : Chennai Madurai
..... of the constitution of india. 17. vaigai pala commission vanigargal nala sangam is an association formed subsequent to the memorandum of understanding dated 17.04.2015. their representation was rejected by saying that allotment to them will be considered in future, when additional shops are constructed. it is also pertinent to note that it is ..... registered the nala sangam in the name of vaigai pala commission vanigargal nala sangam and sought for allotment of shops. but, the second respondent rejected the representation made by the nala sangam and issued the order dated 02.11.2016, wherein, it is stated that no public auction will be conducted for allotment ..... the situation is made worse by the handing over of public functions of private entrepreneurs, which then exploit the policies of the government against the poor and downtrodden people of the country. if the appellants under the guise of the police are permitted to deny renewal opf licences in favour of the licensees, it would amount to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... same.) 1. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned counsels appearing for respondents 1 to 3 and 5. despite, notice being served, there is no representation on behalf of the fourth respondent either in person or through the counsel. 2. for the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to here under according to their ..... the petitioner/ first defendant in this transfer civil miscellaneous petition: (i) it is stated that very many important questions of law of public importance in which large number of people interested and determination of them is necessary for the disposal of the said suit. (ii) the validity as to explanation (1) to section 59 of the indian succession act ..... and appreciation of the whole range of facts and law as in first appeal it is bound to do in a case of this type. where lakhs of people are excitedly affected by the ultimate decision and the fate of a few hundred suits and a thousand churches is to be settled by a single adjudication, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... ,28,578/-, from 12/12/2007 to 5/3/2012 and to pay enhanced compensation under the right to fair compensation act, 2013. 5. contending inter alia that the said representation remained unanswered, the petitioner has filed w.p.no.37593 of 2015, for a mandamus as stated supra. 6. going through the material on record and submissions made, the writ ..... 3/2012 which in terms of section 21 of the legal services authorities act, 1987, is a decree. after nearly 3 years and 7 months, writ petitioner has sent a representation, dated 27/10/2015, to reopen a decree, which has reached finality. even taking it for granted that remedy is provided under common law to challenge a decree, the same ..... acceptedas per given compensation amount3,46,082.113,46,082.11 amount given3,46,082.003,46,082.11 c index 4 (the award amount accepted by both parties through people's lok adalat) parties accepted the land cost as per index 2 b ... 16,74,660.00 recovery if any ... ------ already given amount as per index 3 c ... 3,46 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... is not substantiated by any material. no material had been produced showing that the revision petitioner was travelling several places. 9. contending that condoning the delay in representation is between the court and the appellant, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the respondent cannot have any objection for condoning the delay. it ..... in action on the part of the revision petitioner. 14. the learned counsel for the revision petitioner has submitted that by declining to condone the delay in representation of the appeal, the revision petitioner would be deprived of the opportunity from filing the appeal in the first appellate court. contentions of the parties in ..... properly dealt with, not only to punish them for the wrong done, but also to deter others from indulging in similar acts which shake the faith of people in the system of administration of justice. 23. in yet another case in suo motu proceedings against r.karuppan, advocate reported in (2001) 5 scc 289 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... respondent herein, is not the authority to reject the demand of the petitioner, without referring the matter to board of management has been denied. representation dated 06.04.2016 of the president of rica employees union, addressed to 3rd respondent, in addition to other respondents was discussed in detail ..... of prisons and correctional administrations, vellore, the first respondent herein, that if any employee had completed 60 years of service, on the date of representation, he should be sanctioned duty pay and allowances, all monetary benefits for 2 years, with terminal benefits taking into account of 2 years of service ..... .02.201658 yearssuperior7jeyaramanoffice assistant30.04.201658 yearsinferior8k.thulasivanangardener31.05.201658 yearsinferior 12. it is the further submission of the petitioner that he submitted a representation dated 06.04.2016 to the respondents herein, and requested the board of management of academy of prisons and correctional administrations, vellore, the first .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... of pay in terms of the settlement entered into under section 12(3) of the industrial disputes act, 1947. since his pay was not revised, he made a representation dated 2.11.2016 therefor and that the same has not been considered. therefore, this writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus,directing the ..... with interest at the rate of 18% per annum based on the said settlement. 2. learned counsels for the respondents submitted that the respondents would dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 2.11.2016 within a time frame. 3. recording the above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the ..... representation of the petitioner dated 2.11.2016, in the light of the terms of settlement dated 13.04.2015 entered under section 12(3) of industrial disputes act, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... to a resultant conclusion without any haziness that even if the appellant/complainant was not present in the instant case either in person or through his authorised representation/counsel, the said absence should have been viewed with discretion. but the same was not done in the present case which resulted in an acquittal order ..... dismissed in our processual criminal justice delivery system. after all, if a complainant remained absent on a particular date of hearing and if there was no representation on his side either in person or through learned counsel, at best, it would unerringly point out that the complainant's lackadaisical or laissez attitude in ..... the learned judicial magistrate, udhagamandalam, while passing the order in c.c.no.53/2011 on 30.08.2016, had observed the following: complainant absent. no representation. bailable warrant pending. as the complainant did not appear before this court and take steps to proceed the case this court issued notice to the complainant to appear .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... 1864.) 1. this writ petition has been filed by n.thilakavathi, seeking a direction to the district collector, coimbatore/the fourth respondent herein to dispose of the pending representation dated 24.12.2016, on merits, so as to take effective steps to recover the remaining portion of the award passed by the deputy commissioner of labour, coimbatore. ..... dated 25.04.2012. however, the first respondent/r.santhamani, wife of late ramalingam has deposited the award amount without interest. therefore, the petitioner has given a representation on 24.12.2016 to the district collector/fourth respondent to recover the remaining portion of the award amount namely 12% of the interest (rs.3,73,800/-) ..... payable from 30th day of the injury or death occurred to her husband till the date of realisation. since the representation dated 24.12.2016 has not been considered, she has been advised to come to this court. 3. mr.j.h.iniyan, learned government advocate takes notice .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... specified in the notice. if the bank or financial institution comes to the conclusion that the representation/ objection of the borrower is not acceptable, then reasons for nonacceptance are required to be communicated within one week. sub-section (4) of section 13 specifies ..... secured assets intended to be enforced by the bank or financial institution. sub-section (3-a) of section 13 lays down that the borrower may make a representation in response to the notice issued under section 13(2) and challenge the classification of his account as non-performing asset as also the quantum of amount ..... : for the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the communication of the reasons to the borrower by the secured creditor for not having accepted his representation or objection or the likely action of the secured creditor at the stage of communication of reasons to the borrower shall not entitle the person (including borrower) to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... relevant prescribed register before the district electoral officer, chennai district viz., the commissioner of corporation of chennai, under rule 88 of the rules under representation of people act. 7. the learned senior counsel for the applicant/1st respondent projects an argument that as far as the election expenditure of the election petitioner ..... senior counsel for the applicant/1st respondent submits that the 1st respondent/election petitioner has taken a new stand with reference to 10a of the representation of the people act, 1951 11. the learned senior counsel for the applicant/1st respondent refers to the handbook for candidates of election commission of india, 2009 ..... 1 of 2011) had stated that the he had submitted his accounts to the authorities concerned well within the time limit prescribed under the representation of the people act and obtain the necessary approval by the concerned authority etc. 18. the learned senior counsel for the 1st respondent/election petitioner brings it .....
Tag this Judgment!