Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 section 140 repealed Court: mumbai Page 2 of about 18 results (0.111 seconds)

Manohar Vs. Kunal (Baba) and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... contract entered into by the respondent no.1 in the course of his business with the appropriate government incurring disqualification as provided by section 9a of the representation of the people act, 1951. 9. all the factual aspects are admitted by the respondent no.1. it was further admitted that respondent no.1 was required to ..... anr. vs. union of india and anr. ? (2003) 4 scc 399, inter-alia it is declared that the contrary provisions made thereafter being section 32b of the representation of the people (3rd amendment) act, 2002, as constitutionally invalid. further, in the case of resurgence india vs. election commission of india ? 2014 air(sc) 344, it was ..... i.e. the government of maharashtra which was entered in due course of his business. therefore, in view of the provisions of section 9a of the representation of the people act, 1951, he was disqualified from contesting the election. 5. there is no dispute between the parties that if the assets and liabilities which are substantive .....

Maharashtra Navnirman Sena Through Its General Secretary, Mr. Shirish ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR329

..... list, it will be difficult for this court to grant such a relief. even otherwise, this relief cannot be granted, as there is a procedure prescribed under the representation of people act and the rules made there under to object to inclusion of a particular voter in a voters' list.11. for these reasons, we do not find merit ..... bogus voting in the ensuing election.6. respondent no. 2 has filed a counter affidavit, in which it has stated that in terms of section 61 of the representation of people act, 1951, the commission is obliged to take measures and prescribe procedure for preventing impersonation of electors, and therefore, circulars are being issued from time to time. ..... cards' issued on or before 2822009 shall also be permitted as an additional document for establishing the identity of electors at the general election to the house of the people in the state of maharashtra.3. earlier to it, an order was passed on 6th april, 2009. the order dated 11th april, 2009 is in addition to the .....

Deepak Ganpatrao Salunke Vs. Governor of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR263; 2000(5)BomCR106; 2000BomCR(Cri)106; 1999CriLJ1224

..... . 6 has made false statements and has thereby committed breach of code of conduct or has indulged in corrupt practices, as described under section 123 of the representation of the people act, 1951, are without any substance.19. the main bone of contention of the petitioner is that the respondent no. 6 made a statement in public ..... petitioner has contended that these statements by the respondent no. 6 amount to offence under the indian penal code and corrupt practices under section 123 of the representation of the people act, 1951.9. the petitioner has contended that this statement offering the post of deputy chief minister was made by the respondent no. 6 to gain ..... commission of offences covered by chapter ix-a of indian penal code. these activities also amount to corrupt practices within the meaning of section 123(3) of the representation of the people act, 1951. on account of this, the respondents nos. 1 to 5 and 7 ought to have taken action against respondent no. 6. the petitioner .....

Madhuri W/O Nagesh Dhurve Vs. State Election Commissioner and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(5)MhLj716

..... clear as eloquent from sub-section (2) of section 428 and as interpreted and on the lines on which the guidance can be sought from the precedents under the representation of the people act. in this situation, had the relief which ought to have been prayed for sought, would have automatically followed, but cannot be construed to automatically follow now in absence ..... remedy was available and has not been resorted to.11. we find that the election law has all throughout been recognized as a law of hyper technicalities. representatives of the people are expected to be extremely diligent in the matter of challenge to the election. this is rather the only reason why the limitation prescribed for challenging the declaration of returned .....

Nandkishore S/O Mohan Lal Lahoti Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR103; 2006(6)MhLj552

..... -the term 'election' as occurring in article 329 has been held to mean and include the entire process from the issue of the notification under section 14 of the representation of the people act, 1951.their lordships of the apex court observed that the election disputes are not just private civil disputes between two parties and held that the order of the ..... commission of india through secretary v. ashok kumar and ors. reported in : (2001)illj601sc and in the case of union of india v. association for democratic reforms and anr. with peoples union for civil liberties and anr. v. union of india and anr. reported in air 2002 scw 2186. in the first case, the election commissioner had issued directions by notification .....

Motsingh Vs. Bhaiyyalal

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1968Bom370; (1968)70BOMLR257; 1968MhLJ313

..... under art. 191(1)(a) of the constitution, there is no question of setting aside his election on that ground under section 100(1)(a) of the representation of the people act, 1951. the petition will have therefore to stand dismissed with costs.(35) issue no. 5:- in the result, the election petition calling in question the ..... not pressed.4. is the election of the respondent liable to be set aside on the ground that it is void under s. 100(1)(a) of the representation of the people act, 1951?.........no.5. relief and costs?.........the petition stands dismissed with costs.reasons for the findings.(6) issue no. 1(a) - according to mr. dharmadhikari ..... a) of the constitution from being chosen as a member of the legislative assembly. his election should be declared void under section 100(1)(a) of the representation of the people act, 1951.(4) respondent bhaiyyalal contested the claim of the petitioner on the ground that he was not getting any honorarium or any other kind of payment .....

Chandrabhan S/O Dasrath Bagade Vs. NitIn S/O Jayramji Gadkari and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(2)MhLj392

..... not inclined to impose any costs on the petitioner.34. under the circumstances, the election petition is dismissed under the provisions of section 86 of the representation of the people act, 1951 for non-compliance of the provision of section 81 as the election petition is barred by limitation. under the circumstances there shall be no ..... the apex court in the case of chandrakant shukla v. maharaja martand singh, reported in : air1973sc584 has held as follows :'section 81(1) of the representation of the people act, 1951, provides that an election petition calling in question any election may be presented on one or more of the grounds specified in sub-section (1 ..... stand as a candidate for election and the entire procedure in relation thereto are created and determined by statute. accordingly, when section 66 of the representation of the people act, 1951 provides that the result of the election shall be declared in the manner provided by the act or the rules made thereunder, the declaration .....

Sharad Madhavrao Patil Vs. Rohidas Chudaman Patil

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(2)BomCR883

..... button for starting the voting machine which resulted in more votes being cast in his favour amounting to corrupt practice under section 123(2) of the representation of die peoples act? -no-19) whether the petitioner proves that the respondent, who runs various educational institutions, derived benefits of the same and got enrolled many ..... of law?-yes-5) whether the petitioner proves that respondent committed corrupt practices as enumerated under the provisions of section 123(1)(a) of the representation of the people act?-no-6) whether the petitioner proves that respondent bribed the voters of village ajang?-no-7) whether the petitioner proves that respondent bribed the ..... raises any adjudicatory and triable issues?-yes-3) whether the petition is bad for non compliance of statutory provisions of section 81(3) of the representation of the people act? if yes, what is the consequence?-no-4) whether the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the contentions concerning corrupt practices is .....

Namdeo Chimnaji Tapre and anr. Vs. Govinddas Ratanlal Bhatia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1964Bom137; (1963)65BOMLR843; ILR1964Bom114; 1964MhLJ51

..... objection. it is argued that each petitionershould have made a separate deposit. the matter fallsto be decided by the provisions of section 117 of the representation of the people act and section 117 requiresthat 'the petitioner shall enclose with the petition a government treasury receipt showing that the deposit of rs-2000/- has ..... 1962, which is endorsed on the reverse of ex. 125. that order was as follows:'in accordance with the provisions contained insection 36 of the representation of the people act 1951,i examined and scrutinised this nomination paper andorder as below : there is a difference in the surnames of both the candidate, and ..... election petition was presented by the twoappellants namdeo chimanji tapre and namdeo wakujlaraj. they claimed to be electors within the meaningof section 81 of the representation of the people act. theyalleged several grounds on which they claimed that theelection of the first respondent ought to be declared void.the principal ground was that the .....

Chandrakant Uttam Chodankar Vs. Dayanand Rayu Mandrekar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2006Bom16; 2006(2)ALLMR707; 2006(1)MhLj676

..... 5,000/- (rupees five thousand only) to be paid by the respondent to the petitioner. the registrar to comply with the provisions of section 103 of the representation of the peoples act, 1951.29. shri thali, the learned counsel on behalf of the respondent, requests for a stay of the operation of this judgment for a period ..... the case of shibu soren (supra) the supreme court has stated that the expression 'office of profit' has not been defined either in the constitution or in the representation of the people act but in common parlance, the expression profit connotes an idea of some pecuniary gain and if there is really some gain, its label -- honorarium -- remuneration ..... holding any office as contemplated by article 191(1)(a) of the constitution the word 'office' has not been defined in the constitution nor in the representation of the people act, 1951, but various pronouncements of the supreme court have now given to it a definite meaning. generally if means a position or place to which .....