Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 chapter viia declaration of assets and liabilities Page 17 of about 203 results (0.145 seconds)

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Mr. Dr. G Sai Abilash Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the act (making of a government order) invalid and consequently, the government order cannot be considered as a valid and binding one, nor as a representation held out by the government, creating any right to seek the benefit of that government order by invoking the principle of promissory estoppel against the government. ..... & 59 observed: 58. the emerging situation is one where private interest is pitted against public interest. the motion of public interest synonymises collective welfare of the people and public institutions and is generally informed with the dictates of public trust doctrine - res communis i.e. by everyone in common. perceptionally health, law and ..... impugned act is one big leap in that direction.16. community health concerns and our international commitment: india's concern for providing health care to its people stems not only from the constitutional mandate as progressively interpreted by the apex court, but also from its international commitments; article 55(b) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Dr Niharika H S Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the act (making of a government order) invalid and consequently, the government order cannot be considered as a valid and binding one, nor as a representation held out by the government, creating any right to seek the benefit of that government order by invoking the principle of promissory estoppel against the government. ..... & 59 observed: 58. the emerging situation is one where private interest is pitted against public interest. the motion of public interest synonymises collective welfare of the people and public institutions and is generally informed with the dictates of public trust doctrine - res communis i.e. by everyone in common. perceptionally health, law and ..... impugned act is one big leap in that direction.16. community health concerns and our international commitment: india's concern for providing health care to its people stems not only from the constitutional mandate as progressively interpreted by the apex court, but also from its international commitments; article 55(b) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Mr.kushal B.r. Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the act (making of a government order) invalid and consequently, the government order cannot be considered as a valid and binding one, nor as a representation held out by the government, creating any right to seek the benefit of that government order by invoking the principle of promissory estoppel against the government. ..... & 59 observed: 58. the emerging situation is one where private interest is pitted against public interest. the motion of public interest synonymises collective welfare of the people and public institutions and is generally informed with the dictates of public trust doctrine - res communis i.e. by everyone in common. perceptionally health, law and ..... impugned act is one big leap in that direction.16. community health concerns and our international commitment: india's concern for providing health care to its people stems not only from the constitutional mandate as progressively interpreted by the apex court, but also from its international commitments; article 55(b) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Ananya Anantharaman Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the act (making of a government order) invalid and consequently, the government order cannot be considered as a valid and binding one, nor as a representation held out by the government, creating any right to seek the benefit of that government order by invoking the principle of promissory estoppel against the government. ..... & 59 observed: 58. the emerging situation is one where private interest is pitted against public interest. the motion of public interest synonymises collective welfare of the people and public institutions and is generally informed with the dictates of public trust doctrine - res communis i.e. by everyone in common. perceptionally health, law and ..... impugned act is one big leap in that direction.16. community health concerns and our international commitment: india's concern for providing health care to its people stems not only from the constitutional mandate as progressively interpreted by the apex court, but also from its international commitments; article 55(b) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2012 (HC)

Tata Motors Limited and Others Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... held as follows:- 40. regulation 16(4) provides that the council shall on the consideration of the report and the further report, if any, and the representation of the member, record its findings. 51. it is true that this court in interpreting the constitution enjoys a freedom which is not available in interpreting a statue ..... in paragraph 7. he submitted that the court must not seek an unnecessary confrontation with the legislature, particularly since the legislature consists of representatives elected by the people. a court can declare a statute to be unconstitutional when there can be no manner of doubt that it is flagrantly unconstitutional and there is no way ..... para86 at page 313 of the said judgment although there exists a presumption that an act is constitutional and that legislature understands and appreciates needs of the people, but when the law is ex facie discriminatory or arbitrary or violative of any other provisions of the constitution or a law laid down by the supreme .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2016 (HC)

Satish N Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... some of the provisions of the aggregator rules imposed onerous and vicarious liabilities on the petitioners, on 05.04.2016, the petitioner no.1 filed a representation before the principal secretary to the government, transport department, seeking certain clarifications with respect to the aggregator rules. thereafter, on 18.04.2016, the ..... and unbridled. moreover, technicalities of law cannot be permitted to become obstacles in the road to justice. if the impugned aggregator rules do violate the peoples' right to privacy, then mere technicality cannot be permitted to shield such a law from the power of judicial review.152. constitutional history and ..... to the digital age, a person's personal information was known within a limited circle; in the digital age the personal information is available to unlimited people, institutions, and the government. personal information is co-related to right of privacy, as discussed above. the law also recognizes the importance of safeguarding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 1998 (FN)

Ortiz Vs. Fibreboard Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the california court of appeal." app. to pet. for cert. 428a. finding of fact ~ 346 lists the shared common interests among subclasses that argue for single representation, including "avoiding the potentially disastrous results of a loss ... in the coverage case," "maximizing the total settlement contribution," "reducing transaction costs and delays," "minimizing ... ..... represented subclasses. in this case, the limit of the fund was determined by treating the settlement agreement as dispositive, an error magnified by the representation of class members by counsel also representing excluded plaintiffs, whose settlements would be funded fully upon settlement of the class action on any terms that ..... to be satisfied from the limited fund as the source of payment. each of the people represented in ross, for example, had comparable entitlement as a legatee under the testator's will. those subject to representation in dickinson had a common source of claims in the solicitation of funds by parties .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2020 (SC)

Avitel Post Studioz Limited and Ors. Vs. Hsbc Pi Holding (Mauritius) L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... connection with this agreement, including any question regarding its existence, validity, interpretation, breach or termination (emphasis supplied) 72 (ii) that the impersonation, false representations made, and diversion of funds are all inter parties, having no public flavour as explained in paragraph 14 so as to attract the fraud exception .22. ..... group did not have immediate business worth close to usd1billion with independent and legitimate customers including the purported relationship with the bbc; g. the representations and/or warranties contained in clause 6.2.3 of the ssa because there had been facts or circumstances relating to the affairs of avitel ..... 7.14 the tribunal additionally accepts the claimant's submission and finds that the claimant was induced by and did rely on the respondents further representations that, inter alia, the avitel group had immediate business with a value of approximately usd1billion with independent and legitimate customers as well as good .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 2013 (HC)

iti Limited Bangalore Vs. the Tahsildar, Palakkad

Court : Kerala

..... in law; iii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on exts.p11 and p12 representations. iv. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents not to resume the land as per ext.p13 and allow the ..... and it is a pioneer project in the country. there are no other medical institution in palakkad or nearby places to cater to the health requirement of thousands of people from the said area. the government issued government order dated 22.12.2000 in g.o.(ms)no.387/2000/rd for disposal of the lands acquired under the ..... the plaintiff that they had the right to forfeit the lease of the kuchwar company and grant a fresh lease to the plaintiff. the plaintiff no doubt believed in that representation and entered into the contract on that understanding. as a result of the decision of the privy council, however, the bihar government became incapable of making out the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 1950 (SC)

Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1951SC41; (1951)53BOMLR499; [1951]21CompCas33(SC); [1950]1SCR869

..... of the circumstances under which it was passed and the reasons which necessitated it. 13. a reference of the parliamentary proceedings shows that some time ago, a representation was made on behalf of a section of the shareholders of the sholapur company to the registrar of joint stock companies in bombay, against the conduct of ..... founded on a valid basis of classification, that its discriminations were based upon adequate grounds and that the law was passed for safeguarding the needs of the people and that, therefore, the onus was upon the petitioner to allege and prove that the classification which he challenged did not rest upon any reasonable basis but ..... 152, 157, in which the relevant passage runs as follows :- 'it must be presumed that a legislature understands and correctly appreciates the need of its own people, that its laws are directed to problems made manifest by experience and that its discriminations are based upon adequate grounds.' 11. the onus is therefore on the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //